215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11025707)
1. A randomized phase 3 study of intraoperative cavernous nerve stimulation with penile tumescence monitoring to improve nerve sparing during radical prostatectomy.
Klotz L; Heaton J; Jewett M; Chin J; Fleshner N; Goldenberg L; Gleave M
J Urol; 2000 Nov; 164(5):1573-8. PubMed ID: 11025707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nocturnal tumescence: a parameter for postoperative erectile integrity after nerve sparing radical prostatectomy.
Bannowsky A; Schulze H; van der Horst C; Seif C; Braun PM; Jünemann KP
J Urol; 2006 Jun; 175(6):2214-7. PubMed ID: 16697842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Neurostimulation during radical prostatectomy: improving nerve-sparing techniques.
Klotz L
Semin Urol Oncol; 2000 Feb; 18(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 10719931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interposition of sural nerve restores function of cavernous nerves resected during radical prostatectomy.
Kim ED; Scardino PT; Hampel O; Mills NL; Wheeler TM; Nath RK
J Urol; 1999 Jan; 161(1):188-92. PubMed ID: 10037395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of unilateral sural nerve graft on recovery of potency and continence following radical prostatectomy: 3-year longitudinal study.
Namiki S; Saito S; Nakagawa H; Sanada T; Yamada A; Arai Y
J Urol; 2007 Jul; 178(1):212-6; discussion 216. PubMed ID: 17499797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of statin therapy on early return of potency after nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Hong SK; Han BK; Jeong SJ; Byun SS; Lee SE
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):613-6. PubMed ID: 17570410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recovery of erectile function after radical prostatectomy is quantitatively related to the response to intraoperative cavernous nerve stimulation.
Rabbani F; Patel M; Cozzi P; Mulhall JP; Scardino PT
BJU Int; 2009 Nov; 104(9):1252-7. PubMed ID: 19338540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preserved postoperative penile size correlates well with maintained erectile function after bilateral nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Briganti A; Fabbri F; Salonia A; Gallina A; Chun FK; Dehò F; Zanni G; Suardi N; Karakiewicz PI; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
Eur Urol; 2007 Sep; 52(3):702-7. PubMed ID: 17418936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dissociation of sexual function and sexual bother following autologous sural nerve grafting during radical prostatectomy.
Kuwata Y; Muneuchi G; Igawa HH; Tsukuda F; Inui M; Kakehi Y
Int J Urol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):510-4. PubMed ID: 17593095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. New insights into the pathogenesis of penile shortening after radical prostatectomy and the role of postoperative sexual function.
Gontero P; Galzerano M; Bartoletti R; Magnani C; Tizzani A; Frea B; Mondaini N
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):602-7. PubMed ID: 17570431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recovery of erectile function after unilateral and bilateral cavernous nerve interposition grafting during radical pelvic surgery.
Satkunasivam R; Appu S; Al-Azab R; Hersey K; Lockwood G; Lipa J; Fleshner NE
J Urol; 2009 Mar; 181(3):1258-63. PubMed ID: 19152922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Early experience with intraoperative cavernous nerve stimulation with penile tumescence monitoring to improve nerve sparing during radical prostatectomy.
Klotz L; Herschorn S
Urology; 1998 Oct; 52(4):537-42. PubMed ID: 9763068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Single institution 2-year patient reported validated sexual function outcomes after nerve sparing robot assisted radical prostatectomy.
Rodriguez E; Finley DS; Skarecky D; Ahlering TE
J Urol; 2009 Jan; 181(1):259-63. PubMed ID: 19013596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Recovery of erectile function after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: improvement with nightly low-dose sildenafil.
Bannowsky A; Schulze H; van der Horst C; Hautmann S; Jünemann KP
BJU Int; 2008 May; 101(10):1279-83. PubMed ID: 18284406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intraoperative cavernous nerve stimulation during nerve sparing radical prostatectomy: how and when?
Klotz L
Curr Opin Urol; 2000 May; 10(3):239-43. PubMed ID: 10858904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intraoperative electrophysiological confirmation of neurovascular bundle preservation during radical prostatectomy: long-term assessment of urinary and sexual function.
Namiki S; Terai A; Nakagawa H; Ikeda Y; Saito S; Satoh M; Ishidoya S; Yoshimura K; Ichioka K; Arai Y
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2005 Nov; 35(11):660-6. PubMed ID: 16278223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of nerve sparing technique on patient self-assessed outcomes after radical perineal prostatectomy.
Kübler HR; Tseng TY; Sun L; Vieweg J; Harris MJ; Dahm P
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):488-92; discussion 492. PubMed ID: 17561133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction of postoperative sexual function after nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Michl UH; Friedrich MG; Graefen M; Haese A; Heinzer H; Huland H
J Urol; 2006 Jul; 176(1):227-31. PubMed ID: 16753406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Significance of neurovascular bundle formation observed on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging regarding postoperative erectile function after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.
Lee SE; Hong SK; Han JH; Han BK; Yu JH; Jeong SJ; Byun SS; Lee HJ
Urology; 2007 Mar; 69(3):510-4. PubMed ID: 17382155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy].
Okada K; Tada M; Nakano A; Konno T
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1988 Apr; 15(4 Pt 2-2):1144-9. PubMed ID: 3382190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
