These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11025709)

  • 1. Whole mounted radical prostatectomy specimens do not increase detection of adverse pathological features.
    Hollenbeck BK; Bassily N; Wei JT; Montie JE; Hayasaka S; Taylor JM; Rubin MA
    J Urol; 2000 Nov; 164(5):1583-6. PubMed ID: 11025709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Significance of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in Gleason score 7 radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Whittemore DE; Hick EJ; Carter MR; Moul JW; Miranda-Sousa AJ; Sexton WJ
    J Urol; 2008 Feb; 179(2):516-22; discussion 522. PubMed ID: 18076949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preoperative prediction of small volume cancer (less than 0.5 ml) in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Cheng L; Poulos CK; Pan CX; Jones TD; Daggy JK; Eble JN; Koch MO
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):898-902. PubMed ID: 16093983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative analysis of whole mount processing and systematic sampling of radical prostatectomy specimens: pathological outcomes and risk of biochemical recurrence.
    Salem S; Chang SS; Clark PE; Davis R; Herrell SD; Kordan Y; Wills ML; Shappell SB; Baumgartner R; Phillips S; Smith JA; Cookson MS; Barocas DA
    J Urol; 2010 Oct; 184(4):1334-40. PubMed ID: 20723932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
    Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improved risk stratification for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using a novel risk group system based on prostate specific antigen density and biopsy Gleason score.
    Freedland SJ; Wieder JA; Jack GS; Dorey F; deKernion JB; Aronson WJ
    J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 12050502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Complete embedding and close step-sectioning of radical prostatectomy specimens both increase detection of extra-prostatic extension, and correlate with increased disease-free survival by stage of prostate cancer patients.
    Desai A; Wu H; Sun L; Sesterhenn IA; Mostofi FK; McLeod D; Amling C; Kusuda L; Lance R; Herring J; Foley J; Baldwin D; Bishoff JT; Soderdahl D; Moul JW
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2002; 5(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 12496984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lack of association of prostate carcinoma nuclear grading with prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Zhou M; Hayasaka S; Taylor JM; Shah R; Proverbs-Singh T; Manley S; Rubin MA
    J Urol; 2001 Dec; 166(6):2193-7. PubMed ID: 11696734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlation of the primary Gleason pattern on prostate needle biopsy with clinico-pathological factors in Gleason 7 tumors.
    Grober ED; Tsihlias J; Jewett MA; Sweet JM; Evans AJ; Trachtenberg J; Robinette M; Nam RK
    Can J Urol; 2004 Feb; 11(1):2157-62. PubMed ID: 15003158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pathological outcomes and biochemical progression in men with T1c prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy with prostate specific antigen 2.6 to 4.0 vs 4.1 to 6.0 ng/ml.
    Makarov DV; Humphreys EB; Mangold LA; Walsh PC; Partin AW; Epstein JI; Freedland SJ
    J Urol; 2006 Aug; 176(2):554-8. PubMed ID: 16813888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prognostic factors for survival of patients with pathological Gleason score 7 prostate cancer: differences in outcome between primary Gleason grades 3 and 4.
    Lau WK; Blute ML; Bostwick DG; Weaver AL; Sebo TJ; Zincke H
    J Urol; 2001 Nov; 166(5):1692-7. PubMed ID: 11586204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictors of Gleason pattern 4/5 prostate cancer on prostatectomy specimens: can high grade tumor be predicted preoperatively?
    Rubin MA; Mucci NR; Manley S; Sanda M; Cushenberry E; Strawderman M; Montie JE; Bassily NH
    J Urol; 2001 Jan; 165(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 11125378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A single microfocus (5% or less) of Gleason 6 prostate cancer at biopsy--can we predict adverse pathological outcomes?
    Thong AE; Shikanov S; Katz MH; Gofrit ON; Eggener S; Zagaja GP; Shalhav AL; Zorn KC
    J Urol; 2008 Dec; 180(6):2436-40. PubMed ID: 18930486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer.
    Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM
    J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):104-9; discussion 109-10. PubMed ID: 11435833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of discordance between biopsy and pathological Gleason scores on survival after radical prostatectomy.
    Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ; Crispen PL; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Sebo TJ; Blute ML
    J Urol; 2009 Jan; 181(1):95-104; discussion 104. PubMed ID: 19012937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pathological parameters of radical prostatectomy for clinical stages T1c versus T2 prostate adenocarcinoma: decreased pathological stage and increased detection of transition zone tumors.
    Jack GS; Cookson MS; Coffey CS; Vader V; Roberts RL; Chang SS; Smith JA; Shappell SB
    J Urol; 2002 Aug; 168(2):519-24. PubMed ID: 12131301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The combined percentage of Gleason patterns 4 and 5 is the best predictor of cancer progression after radical prostatectomy.
    Cheng L; Koch MO; Juliar BE; Daggy JK; Foster RS; Bihrle R; Gardner TA
    J Clin Oncol; 2005 May; 23(13):2911-7. PubMed ID: 15860849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved clinical staging system combining biopsy laterality and TNM stage for men with T1c and T2 prostate cancer: results from the SEARCH database.
    Freedland SJ; Presti JC; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Aronson WJ; Dorey F; Amling CL;
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2129-35. PubMed ID: 12771734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preoperative serum prostate specific antigen does not reflect biochemical failure rates after radical prostatectomy in men with large volume cancers.
    Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM
    J Urol; 2000 Nov; 164(5):1596-600. PubMed ID: 11025712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prostate cancers scored as Gleason 6 on prostate biopsy are frequently Gleason 7 tumors at radical prostatectomy: implication on outcome.
    Pinthus JH; Witkos M; Fleshner NE; Sweet J; Evans A; Jewett MA; Krahn M; Alibhai S; Trachtenberg J
    J Urol; 2006 Sep; 176(3):979-84; discussion 984. PubMed ID: 16890675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.