These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11025833)

  • 1. Efficacy of 3 commonly used hearing aid circuits: A crossover trial. NIDCD/VA Hearing Aid Clinical Trial Group.
    Larson VD; Williams DW; Henderson WG; Luethke LE; Beck LB; Noffsinger D; Wilson RH; Dobie RA; Haskell GB; Bratt GW; Shanks JE; Stelmachowicz P; Studebaker GA; Boysen AE; Donahue A; Canalis R; Fausti SA; Rappaport BZ
    JAMA; 2000 Oct; 284(14):1806-13. PubMed ID: 11025833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A multi-center, double blind clinical trial comparing benefit from three commonly used hearing aid circuits.
    Larson VD; Williams DW; Henderson WG; Luethke LE; Beck LB; Noffsinger D; Bratt GW; Dobie RA; Fausti SA; Haskell GB; Rappaport BZ; Shanks JE; Wilson RH
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):269-76. PubMed ID: 12195168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality rating test of hearing aid benefit in the NIDCD/VA Clinical Trial.
    Noffsinger D; Haskell GB; Larson VD; Williams DW; Wilson E; Plunkett S; Kenworthy D
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):291-300. PubMed ID: 12195171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
    Shanks JE; Wilson RH; Larson V; Williams D
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Subjective measures of hearing aid benefit in the NIDCD/VA Clinical Trial.
    Haskell GB; Noffsinger D; Larson VD; Williams DW; Dobie RA; Rogers JL
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):301-7. PubMed ID: 12195172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is normal or less than normal overall loudness preferred by first-time hearing aid users?
    Smeds K
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):159-72. PubMed ID: 15064661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of linear gain and wide dynamic range compression hearing aid circuits: aided speech perception measures.
    Jenstad LM; Seewald RC; Cornelisse LE; Shantz J
    Ear Hear; 1999 Apr; 20(2):117-26. PubMed ID: 10229513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the CAMEQ2-HF method for fitting hearing aids with multichannel amplitude compression.
    Moore BC; Füllgrabe C
    Ear Hear; 2010 Oct; 31(5):657-66. PubMed ID: 20526199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of linear gain and wide dynamic range compression hearing aid circuits II: aided loudness measures.
    Jenstad LM; Pumford J; Seewald RC; Cornelisse LE
    Ear Hear; 2000 Feb; 21(1):32-44. PubMed ID: 10708072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of APHAB norms for WDRC hearing aids and comparisons with original norms.
    Johnson JA; Cox RM; Alexander GC
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 19692903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Music preferences with hearing aids: effects of signal properties, compression settings, and listener characteristics.
    Croghan NB; Arehart KH; Kates JM
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(5):e170-84. PubMed ID: 25010635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability and validity of judgments of sound quality in elderly hearing aid wearers.
    Narendran MM; Humes LE
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 12598808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of the aided performance and benefit provided by a linear and a two-channel wide dynamic range compression hearing aid.
    Humes LE; Christensen L; Thomas T; Bess FH; Hedley-Williams A; Bentler R
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Feb; 42(1):65-79. PubMed ID: 10025544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of hearing aid signal-processing schemes on acceptable noise levels: perception and prediction.
    Wu YH; Stangl E
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):333-41. PubMed ID: 23334355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Middle ear electromagnetic semi-implantable hearing device: results of the phase II SOUNDTEC direct system clinical trial.
    Hough JV; Matthews P; Wood MW; Dyer RK
    Otol Neurotol; 2002 Nov; 23(6):895-903. PubMed ID: 12438853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech and music quality ratings for linear and nonlinear hearing aid circuitry.
    Davies-Venn E; Souza P; Fabry D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2007 Sep; 18(8):688-99. PubMed ID: 18326155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using trainable hearing aids to examine real-world preferred gain.
    Mueller HG; Hornsby BW; Weber JE
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008; 19(10):758-73. PubMed ID: 19358456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tracking of Noise Tolerance to Predict Hearing Aid Satisfaction in Loud Noisy Environments.
    Seper E; Kuk F; Korhonen P; Slugocki C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Apr; 30(4):302-314. PubMed ID: 30461409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of Adaptive Compression and Fast-Acting WDRC Strategies on Sentence Recognition in Noise in Mandarin-Speaking Pediatric Hearing Aid Users.
    Liu H; Liu Y; Li Y; Jin X; Li J; Zhou Y; Ge W; Ni X
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Apr; 29(4):273-278. PubMed ID: 29664721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomized trial of amplification strategies.
    Yueh B; Souza PE; McDowell JA; Collins MP; Loovis CF; Hedrick SC; Ramsey SD; Deyo RA
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2001 Oct; 127(10):1197-204. PubMed ID: 11587599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.