BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11025870)

  • 1. Improving follow-up after an abnormal pap smear: results from a quasi-experimental intervention study.
    Kaplan CP; Bastani R; Belin TR; Marcus A; Nasseri K; Hu MY
    J Womens Health Gend Based Med; 2000 Sep; 9(7):779-90. PubMed ID: 11025870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving adherence to screening follow-up among women with abnormal Pap smears: results from a large clinic-based trial of three intervention strategies.
    Marcus AC; Crane LA; Kaplan CP; Reading AE; Savage E; Gunning J; Bernstein G; Berek JS
    Med Care; 1992 Mar; 30(3):216-30. PubMed ID: 1538610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Increasing cervical cancer screening among underserved women in a large urban county health system: can it be done? What does it take?
    Bastani R; Berman BA; Belin TR; Crane LA; Marcus AC; Nasseri K; Herman-Shipley N; Bernstein S; Henneman CE
    Med Care; 2002 Oct; 40(10):891-907. PubMed ID: 12395023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effectiveness of interventions to improve follow-up after abnormal cervical cancer screening.
    Yabroff KR; Kerner JF; Mandelblatt JS
    Prev Med; 2000 Oct; 31(4):429-39. PubMed ID: 11006069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The costs of an outreach intervention for low-income women with abnormal Pap smears.
    Wagner TH; Engelstad LP; McPhee SJ; Pasick RJ
    Prev Chronic Dis; 2007 Jan; 4(1):A11. PubMed ID: 17173719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Case management intervention in cervical cancer prevention: the Boston REACH coalition women's health demonstration project.
    Clark CR; Baril N; Hall A; Kunicki M; Johnson N; Soukup J; Lipsitz S; Bigby J
    Prog Community Health Partnersh; 2011; 5(3):235-47. PubMed ID: 22080772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How reminders given to patients and physicians affected pap smear use in a health maintenance organization: results of a randomized controlled trial.
    Burack RC; Gimotty PA; George J; McBride S; Moncrease A; Simon MS; Dews P; Coombs J
    Cancer; 1998 Jun; 82(12):2391-400. PubMed ID: 9635532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reducing loss-to-follow-up among women with abnormal Pap smears. Results from a randomized trial testing an intensive follow-up protocol and economic incentives.
    Marcus AC; Kaplan CP; Crane LA; Berek JS; Bernstein G; Gunning JE; McClatchey MW
    Med Care; 1998 Mar; 36(3):397-410. PubMed ID: 9520963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The burden of prevention: downstream consequences of Pap smear testing in the elderly.
    Sirovich BE; Gottlieb DJ; Fisher ES
    J Med Screen; 2003; 10(4):189-95. PubMed ID: 14738656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving adherence to abnormal Pap smear follow-up.
    Abercrombie PD
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 2001; 30(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 11277165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Community-Academic Partnership to Increase Pap Testing in Appalachian Kentucky.
    Collins T; Stradtman LR; Vanderpool RC; Neace DR; Cooper KD
    Am J Prev Med; 2015 Aug; 49(2):324-30. PubMed ID: 26190807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness of nursing interventions to increase pap smear test screening.
    Guvenc G; Akyuz A; Yenen MC
    Res Nurs Health; 2013 Apr; 36(2):146-57. PubMed ID: 23335354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Papanicolaou smear history and diagnosis of invasive cervical carcinoma among members of a large prepaid health plan.
    Sung HY; Kearney KA; Miller M; Kinney W; Sawaya GF; Hiatt RA
    Cancer; 2000 May; 88(10):2283-9. PubMed ID: 10820350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Papanicolaou testing among Vietnamese Americans: results of a multifaceted intervention.
    Nguyen TT; McPhee SJ; Gildengorin G; Nguyen T; Wong C; Lai KQ; Lam H; Mock J; Luong TN; Bui-Tong N; Ha-Iaconis T
    Am J Prev Med; 2006 Jul; 31(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 16777536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effectiveness of a community outreach intervention to improve follow-up among underserved women at highest risk for cervical cancer.
    Engelstad LP; Stewart S; Otero-Sabogal R; Leung MS; Davis PI; Pasick RJ
    Prev Med; 2005; 41(3-4):741-8. PubMed ID: 16125761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of cervical cancer screening program at a rural community of South Africa.
    Hoque M; Hoque E; Kader SB
    East Afr J Public Health; 2008 Aug; 5(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 19024420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of a self-administered tampon ThinPrep test with conventional pap smears for cervical cytology.
    Budge M; Halford J; Haran M; Mein J; Wright G
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Jun; 45(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 15904447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patterns of cervical cancer screening, diagnosis, and follow-up treatment in a state Medicaid fee-for-service population.
    Nadpara PA; Madhavan SS; Khanna R; Smith M; Miller LA
    Popul Health Manag; 2012 Dec; 15(6):362-71. PubMed ID: 22788858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomised controlled trial of strategies to prompt attendance for a Pap smear.
    Bowman J; Sanson-Fisher R; Boyle C; Pope S; Redman S
    J Med Screen; 1995; 2(4):211-8. PubMed ID: 8719151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cervical cancer screening in a rural population of Zimbabwe.
    Thistle PJ; Chirenje ZM
    Cent Afr J Med; 1997 Sep; 43(9):246-51. PubMed ID: 9509642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.