BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11026118)

  • 1. Equivalency of computer-based and paper-and-pencil testing.
    DeAngelis S
    J Allied Health; 2000; 29(3):161-4. PubMed ID: 11026118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dental anatomy carving computer-assisted instruction program: an assessment of student performance and perceptions.
    Nance ET; Lanning SK; Gunsolley JC
    J Dent Educ; 2009 Aug; 73(8):972-9. PubMed ID: 19648568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Student accuracy and evaluation of a computer-based audience response system.
    Holmes RG; Blalock JS; Parker MH; Haywood VB
    J Dent Educ; 2006 Dec; 70(12):1355-61. PubMed ID: 17170327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Web-based vs. traditional classroom instruction in gerontology: a pilot study.
    Gallagher JE; Dobrosielski-Vergona KA; Wingard RG; Williams TM
    J Dent Hyg; 2005; 79(3):7. PubMed ID: 16197772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pre-athletic training students perform better on written tests with teacher-centered instruction.
    Livecchi NM; Merrick MA; Ingersoll CD; Stemmans CL
    J Allied Health; 2004; 33(3):200-4. PubMed ID: 15503754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An evaluation of two dental simulation systems: virtual reality versus contemporary non-computer-assisted.
    Jasinevicius TR; Landers M; Nelson S; Urbankova A
    J Dent Educ; 2004 Nov; 68(11):1151-62. PubMed ID: 15520234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Feasibility of and satisfaction with the use of low-bandwidth videoconferencing for examination of undergraduate students.
    Mattheos N; Nattestad A; Attström R
    J Telemed Telecare; 2003; 9(5):278-81. PubMed ID: 14599331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Piloting use of computerized practice tests.
    Rossignol M; Scollin P
    Comput Nurs; 2001; 19(5):206-12. PubMed ID: 11577662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of computer technology to modify objective structured clinical examinations.
    Holyfield LJ; Bolin KA; Rankin KV; Shulman JD; Jones DL; Eden BD
    J Dent Educ; 2005 Oct; 69(10):1133-6. PubMed ID: 16204679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between computer-aided testing and traditional multiple choice: an equivalence study.
    Karl M; Graef F; Eitner S; Beck N; Wichmann M; Holst S
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2007 Feb; 11(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 17227394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of linear, fixed-form computer-based testing versus traditional paper-and-pencil-format testing in veterinary medical education.
    Folk LC; March JZ; Hurst RD
    J Vet Med Educ; 2006; 33(3):455-64. PubMed ID: 17035224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Examining the role of collaborative assessment in a didactic dental hygiene course.
    Keselyak NT; Saylor CD; Simmer-Beck M; Bray KK
    J Dent Educ; 2009 Aug; 73(8):980-90. PubMed ID: 19648569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gender plays no role in student ability to perform on computer-based examinations.
    Kies SM; Williams BD; Freund GG
    BMC Med Educ; 2006 Nov; 6():57. PubMed ID: 17132169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using a multifaceted approach including community-based service-learning to enrich formal ethics instruction in a dental school setting.
    Gadbury-Amyot CC; Simmer-Beck M; McCunniff M; Williams KB
    J Dent Educ; 2006 Jun; 70(6):652-61. PubMed ID: 16741133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Student attitudes towards computer-aided testing.
    Karl M; Graef F; Eitner S; Wichmann M; Holst S; Beck N
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2011 May; 15(2):69-72. PubMed ID: 21492340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative study on interactive computer-aided-learning and computer-aided-testing in patient-based dental training in maxillofacial surgery.
    Eitner S; Holst S; Wichmann M; Karl M; Nkenke E; Schlegel A
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2008 Feb; 12(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 18257763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A score comparability study for the NBDHE: paper-pencil versus computer versions.
    Tsai TH; Shin CD
    Eval Health Prof; 2013 Jun; 36(2):228-39. PubMed ID: 22627002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effectiveness of a Mock Board experience in coaching students for the Dental Hygiene National Board Examination.
    Dadian T; Guerink K; Olney C; Littlefield J
    J Dent Educ; 2002 May; 66(5):643-8. PubMed ID: 12056769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimal sequencing of bedside teaching and computer-based learning: a randomised trial.
    Hull P; Chaudry A; Prasthofer A; Pattison G
    Med Educ; 2009 Feb; 43(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 19161479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of alternating dissection on student performance in a medical anatomy course: are dissection videos an effective substitute for actual dissection?
    Granger NA; Calleson D
    Clin Anat; 2007 Apr; 20(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 16795027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.