91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11026855)
1. A comparison of bolus chasing and static digital subtraction arteriography in peripheral vascular disease.
Ashleigh RJ; Hufton AP; Razzaq R; MacDiarmaid-Gordon L
Br J Radiol; 2000 Aug; 73(872):819-24. PubMed ID: 11026855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Dose and contrast medium reduction in intravenous digital subtraction angiography by bolus sequence].
Rückforth J; Schürmann K; Vorwerk D; Günther RW
Rofo; 1998 Oct; 169(4):383-7. PubMed ID: 9819651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dose-area product of patients undergoing digital subtraction angiography (DSA): abdominal aorta and lower limb examinations.
Juszkat R; Blaszak MA; Majewska N; Majewski W
Health Phys; 2009 Jan; 96(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 19066482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lower extremity angiography: improved image quality and outflow vessel detection with bilaterally antegrade selective digital subtraction angiography. A blinded prospective intraindividual comparison with aortic flush digital subtraction angiography.
Jacob AL; Stock KW; Proske M; Steinbrich W
Invest Radiol; 1996 Apr; 31(4):184-93. PubMed ID: 8721957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the lower extremities: standard-dose vs. high-dose gadodiamide injection.
Krause U; Kroencke T; Spielhaupter E; Taupitz M; Kenn W; Hamm B; Hahn D
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Apr; 21(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 15778953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diabetes and peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional digital subtraction angiography.
Kreitner KF; Kalden P; Neufang A; Düber C; Krummenauer F; Küstner E; Laub G; Thelen M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jan; 174(1):171-9. PubMed ID: 10628475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiation doses to patients from digital subtraction angiography.
Goni H; Tsalafoutas IA; Tzortzis G; Pappas P; Bouzas N; Loulakas J; Georgiou A; Georgiou E; Yakoumakis EN
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):251-5. PubMed ID: 16461514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital variance angiography allows about 70% decrease of DSA-related radiation exposure in lower limb X-ray angiography.
Gyánó M; Berczeli M; Csobay-Novák C; Szöllősi D; Óriás VI; Góg I; Kiss JP; Veres DS; Szigeti K; Osváth S; Pataki Á; Juhász V; Oláh Z; Sótonyi P; Nemes B
Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):21790. PubMed ID: 34750427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Peripheral vascular disease: evaluation with stepping DSA and conventional screen-film angiography.
Malden ES; Picus D; Vesely TM; Darcy MD; Hicks ME
Radiology; 1994 Apr; 191(1):149-53. PubMed ID: 8134562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Digital subtraction angiography of the extremities using step-translation technique].
Biederer J; Link J; Stolley C; Heller M
Rofo; 2000 Apr; 172(4):354-60. PubMed ID: 10961220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Digital peripheral angiography with pace shifting and subtraction. Comparison with the standard procedure].
Hilbertz T; Fink U; Beck R; Berger H; Eberwein U
Rofo; 1991 Sep; 155(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 1912540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lower extremity: nonstepping digital angiography with photostimulable imaging plates versus conventional angiography.
Therasse E; Soulez G; Roy P; Gauvin A; Oliva VL; Carrier R; Robillard P
Radiology; 1998 Jun; 207(3):695-703. PubMed ID: 9609892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparison of head dual energy computed tomography angiography and neuro digital subtraction angiography].
Xu Y; Wen L; Han D; Ma CW
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2010 Dec; 32(6):699-703. PubMed ID: 21219804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Intravenous digital subtraction angiography of the lower extremities combined with step translation (2-field DSA)].
Fritschy P; Terrier F
Rofo; 1988 Mar; 148(3):279-84. PubMed ID: 2832892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography with extra-large fields using a computed radiography system in evaluating peripheral vascular disease.
Hasuo K; Mizushima A; Mihara F; Hashiguchi N; Murayama S; Uchino A; Matsumoto S; Gibo M; Torii Y; Komori K; Masuda K
Radiat Med; 1996; 14(5):229-33. PubMed ID: 8988500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimized diagnostic angiography in high-risk patients with severe peripheral vascular disease.
Gates J; Hartnell GG
Radiographics; 2000; 20(1):121-33. PubMed ID: 10682777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [MR angiography of the lower extremities with an automatic table translation (Mobitrak) compared to i.a. DSA].
Busch HP; Hoffmann HG; Metzner C; Oettinger W
Rofo; 1999 Mar; 170(3):275-83. PubMed ID: 10230437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Step back from the patient: reduction of radiation dose to the operator by the systematic use of an automatic power injector for contrast media in an interventional angiography suite.
Larsen AS; Osterås BH
Acta Radiol; 2012 Apr; 53(3):330-4. PubMed ID: 22334873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Peripheral arteries in diabetic patients: standard bolus-chase and time-resolved MR angiography.
Andreisek G; Pfammatter T; Goepfert K; Nanz D; Hervo P; Koppensteiner R; Weishaupt D
Radiology; 2007 Feb; 242(2):610-20. PubMed ID: 17179394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Feasibility of peripheral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla with a hybrid technique: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
Berg F; Bangard C; Bovenschulte H; Hellmich M; Nijenhuis M; Lackner K; Gossmann A
Invest Radiol; 2008 Sep; 43(9):642-9. PubMed ID: 18708858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
