380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11028703)
1. Fitting hearing aids with the Articulation Index: impact on hearing aid effectiveness.
Souza PE; Yueh B; Sarubbi M; Loovis CF
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2000; 37(4):473-81. PubMed ID: 11028703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Personality, hearing problems, and amplification characteristics: contributions to self-report hearing aid outcomes.
Cox RM; Alexander GC; Gray GA
Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):141-62. PubMed ID: 17496667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings.
Hornsby BW; Ricketts TA
Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17496669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Acclimatization in first-time hearing aid users using three different fitting protocols.
Reber MB; Kompis M
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2005 Dec; 32(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 16039083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Performance-Perceptual Test (PPT) and its relationship to aided reported handicap and hearing aid satisfaction.
Saunders GH; Forsline A
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 16672792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of different speech processor and hearing aid settings on speech perception outcomes in electric acoustic stimulation patients.
Vermeire K; Anderson I; Flynn M; Van de Heyning P
Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 18091097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors associated with hearing aid fitting outcomes on the IOI-HA.
Hickson L; Clutterbuck S; Khan A
Int J Audiol; 2010 Aug; 49(8):586-95. PubMed ID: 20515423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Noise analysis of real-life listening situations for maximal speech audibility in hearing aid fitting.
Köbler S; Leijon A
Scand Audiol; 1999; 28(3):179-89. PubMed ID: 10489867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hearing aid accessories for adults: the remote FM microphone.
Boothroyd A
Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 14770015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Survey on hearing aid outcome in Switzerland: associations with type of fitting (bilateral/unilateral), level of hearing aid signal processing, and hearing loss.
Bertoli S; Bodmer D; Probst R
Int J Audiol; 2010 May; 49(5):333-46. PubMed ID: 20380609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Audibility-index predictions of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' performance on the connected speech test.
Sherbecoe RL; Studebaker GA
Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 12598814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Factorial structure of discriminating speech perception in binaural electro-acoustic correction in patients with imparied hearing of various etiology].
Tokarev OP; Bagriantseva MN
Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1990; (3):33-7. PubMed ID: 2382335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. BAHA in children and adolescents with unilateral or bilateral conductive hearing loss: a study of outcome.
Priwin C; Jönsson R; Hultcrantz M; Granström G
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Jan; 71(1):135-45. PubMed ID: 17092570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hearing aid use in Finnish children--impact of hearing loss variables and detection delay.
Marttila TI; Karikoski JO
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Mar; 70(3):475-80. PubMed ID: 16174537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Integrating the acoustics of running speech into the pure tone audiogram: a step from audibility to intelligibility and disability.
Corthals P
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2008; 60(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 18057908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
Lin LM; Bowditch S; Anderson MJ; May B; Cox KM; Niparko JK
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The use of the self-assessment questionnaire to evaluate hearing aid benefit].
de Almeida K; Taguchi CK
Pro Fono; 2004; 16(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 15109113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fit to targets, preferred listening levels, and self-reported outcomes for the DSL v5.0 a hearing aid prescription for adults.
Polonenko MJ; Scollie SD; Moodie S; Seewald RC; Laurnagaray D; Shantz J; Richards A
Int J Audiol; 2010 Aug; 49(8):550-60. PubMed ID: 20438300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
