These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11028761)

  • 21. Methodological quality of systematic reviews of animal studies: a survey of reviews of basic research.
    Mignini LE; Khan KS
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Mar; 6():10. PubMed ID: 16533396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Algorithm for Choosing the Study Design in Systematic Reviews].
    Peinemann F; Kleijnen J
    Klin Padiatr; 2016 Sep; 228(5):235-239. PubMed ID: 27485711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Systematic reviews of diagnostic tests: a guide to methods and application.
    Khan KS
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 19(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 15749064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The assessment of systematic reviews in dentistry.
    Glenny AM; Esposito M; Coulthard P; Worthington HV
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2003 Apr; 111(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 12648258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An introduction to systematic reviews and meta-analyses in health care.
    Rudnicka AR; Owen CG
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 May; 32(3):174-83. PubMed ID: 22512371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Systematic reviews: a primer for plastic surgery research.
    Margaliot Z; Chung KC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007 Dec; 120(7):1834-1841. PubMed ID: 18090745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Methodological issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies in orthopaedic research.
    Simunovic N; Sprague S; Bhandari M
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 May; 91 Suppl 3():87-94. PubMed ID: 19411505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Methods of meta-analysis: an analysis.
    Koretz RL
    Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care; 2002 Sep; 5(5):467-74. PubMed ID: 12172468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. How objective are systematic reviews? Differences between reviews on complementary medicine.
    Linde K; Willich SN
    J R Soc Med; 2003 Jan; 96(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 12519797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Methods for knowledge synthesis: an overview.
    Whittemore R; Chao A; Jang M; Minges KE; Park C
    Heart Lung; 2014; 43(5):453-61. PubMed ID: 25012634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. How useful are Cochrane reviews in identifying research needs?
    Clarke L; Clarke M; Clarke T
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2007 Apr; 12(2):101-3. PubMed ID: 17407660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Systematic reviewing in laboratory medicine. Position Paper from the IFCC Committee on Systematic Reviewing in Laboratory Medicine.
    Sandberg S; Oosterhuis W; Freedman D; Kawai T
    J Int Fed Clin Chem; 1997 Dec; 9(4):154-5. PubMed ID: 10177223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Types of clinical studies. Systematic reviews.
    Varandas T; Carneiro AV
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2006 Feb; 25(2):233-46. PubMed ID: 16673653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Critical reading of systematic reviews and meta-analyses about diagnostic imaging].
    Plana MN; Zamora J; Abraira V
    Radiologia; 2015 Nov; 57 Suppl 2():23-30. PubMed ID: 26071664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evidence-based laboratory medicine.
    Thomas L; Thomas C
    Clin Lab; 2001; 47(9-10):479-82. PubMed ID: 11596910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines.
    Devillé WL; Buntinx F; Bouter LM; Montori VM; de Vet HC; van der Windt DA; Bezemer PD
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2002 Jul; 2():9. PubMed ID: 12097142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The value of traditional reviews in the era of systematic reviewing.
    Dijkers MP;
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 May; 88(5):423-30. PubMed ID: 19630127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reviewing the literature, how systematic is systematic?
    MacLure K; Paudyal V; Stewart D
    Int J Clin Pharm; 2016 Jun; 38(3):685-94. PubMed ID: 27048436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Overview of evidence-based medicine: challenges for evidence-based laboratory medicine.
    McQueen MJ
    Clin Chem; 2001 Aug; 47(8):1536-46. PubMed ID: 11468264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Synthesis studies as the basis for economic evaluations in health: the need for their quality appraisal].
    Bolaños-Díaz R; Mezones-Holguín E; Gutiérrez-Aguado A; Málaga G
    Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica; 2011; 28(3):528-34. PubMed ID: 22086636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.