207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11030246)
1. Longterm central venous access in gynecologic cancer patients.
Minassian VA; Sood AK; Lowe P; Sorosky JI; Al-Jurf AS; Buller RE
J Am Coll Surg; 2000 Oct; 191(4):403-9. PubMed ID: 11030246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Complications of radiologically placed central venous ports and Hickman catheters in patients with AIDS.
Muscedere G; Bennett JD; Lee TY; Mackie I; Vanderburgh L
Can Assoc Radiol J; 1998 Apr; 49(2):84-9. PubMed ID: 9561010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Complications of indwelling venous access devices in patients with gynecologic malignancies.
Estes JM; Rocconi R; Straughn JM; Bhoola S; Leath CA; Alvarez RD; Kilgore LC; Huh WK
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Dec; 91(3):591-5. PubMed ID: 14675682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiologic placement of long-term central venous peripheral access system ports (PAS Port): results in 150 patients.
Foley MJ
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1995; 6(2):255-62. PubMed ID: 7787360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Peripheral infusion ports for central venous access in patients with gynecologic malignancies.
Cunningham MJ; Collins MB; Kredentser DC; Malfetano JH
Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Mar; 60(3):397-9. PubMed ID: 8774645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Peripheral venous access ports: outcomes analysis in 109 patients.
Bodner LJ; Nosher JL; Patel KM; Siegel RL; Biswal R; Gribbin CE; Tokarz R
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2000; 23(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 10821892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of placement techniques and complications of externalized catheters and implantable port use in children with cancer.
Mirro J; Rao BN; Kumar M; Rafferty M; Hancock M; Austin BA; Fairclough D; Lobe TE
J Pediatr Surg; 1990 Jan; 25(1):120-4. PubMed ID: 2299536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Externalized Groshong catheters and Hickman ports for central venous access in gynecologic oncology patients.
Gleeson NC; Fiorica JV; Mark JE; Pinelli DM; Hoffman MS; Roberts WS; Cavanagh D
Gynecol Oncol; 1993 Dec; 51(3):372-6. PubMed ID: 8112648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of infections in Hickman and implanted port catheters in adult solid tumor patients.
Pegues D; Axelrod P; McClarren C; Eisenberg BL; Hoffman JP; Ottery FD; Keidan RD; Boraas M; Weese J
J Surg Oncol; 1992 Mar; 49(3):156-62. PubMed ID: 1548889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Central venous access devices for the delivery of systemic anticancer therapy (CAVA): a randomised controlled trial.
Moss JG; Wu O; Bodenham AR; Agarwal R; Menne TF; Jones BL; Heggie R; Hill S; Dixon-Hughes J; Soulis E; Germeni E; Dillon S; McCartney E;
Lancet; 2021 Jul; 398(10298):403-415. PubMed ID: 34297997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Upper extremity deep vein thrombosis associated with indwelling peripheral venous catheters in gynecology oncology patients.
Schimp VL; Munkarah AR; Morris RT; Deppe G; Malone J
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 May; 89(2):301-5. PubMed ID: 12713995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Deep venous thrombosis caused by central venous catheter].
Lersch C; Paschalidis M; Theiss W
Vasa; 1999 May; 28(2):71-8. PubMed ID: 10409916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Infectious and non-infectious complications of tunneled central catheters in hematologic patients].
Albo López C; López Rodríguez D; Constenla Camba MI; Jimenéz Blanco A; Araujo LF; García-Medina J
Sangre (Barc); 1999 Jun; 44(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 10481577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term experience with a totally implanted catheter system in gynecologic oncologic patients.
Koonings PP; Given FT
J Am Coll Surg; 1994 Feb; 178(2):164-6. PubMed ID: 8173727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Experience with the intravenous totally implanted port in patients with gynecologic malignancies.
Nelson BE; Mayer AR; Tseng PC; Schwartz PE
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Apr; 53(1):98-102. PubMed ID: 8175028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Insertion of Groshong central venous catheters utilizing fluoroscopic techniques.
Burnett AF; Lossef SV; Barth KH; Grendys EC; Johnson JC; Barter JF; Barnes WA
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Jan; 52(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 8307504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prevention of complications in permanent central venous catheters.
Takasugi JK; O'Connell TX
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1988 Jul; 167(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 3381187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The fate of 100 prolonged venous access devices.
Hayward SR; Ledgerwood AM; Lucas CE
Am Surg; 1990 Sep; 56(9):515-9. PubMed ID: 2393188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tunneled central venous catheters in a gynecologic oncology service: operative and short-term complications.
Geisler JP; Buller RE; Manahan KJ
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2008; 29(2):141-3. PubMed ID: 18459548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cephalic vein cutdown for inserting indwelling subclavian vein catheters in gynecologic oncology patients.
Kamat A; Kramer P; Soisson AP
W V Med J; 2002; 98(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 11941896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
