183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11032139)
1. Mercury emissions from a coal-fired power plant in Japan.
Yokoyama T; Asakura K; Matsuda H; Ito S; Noda N
Sci Total Environ; 2000 Oct; 259(1-3):97-103. PubMed ID: 11032139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mercury removals by existing pollutants control devices of four coal-fired power plants in China.
Wang J; Wang W; Xu W; Wang X; Zhao S
J Environ Sci (China); 2011; 23(11):1839-44. PubMed ID: 22432308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mercury speciation and mass distribution of coal-fired power plants in Taiwan using different air pollution control processes.
Chou CP; Chiu CH; Chang TC; Hsi HC
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2021 May; 71(5):553-563. PubMed ID: 33284737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The fate and behavior of mercury in coal-fired power plants.
Meij R; Vredenbregt LH; te Winkel H
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2002 Aug; 52(8):912-7. PubMed ID: 12184689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. As, Hg, and Se flue gas sampling in a coal-fired power plant and their fate during coal combustion.
Otero-Rey JR; López-Vilariño JM; Moreda-Piñeiro J; Alonso-Rodríguez E; Muniategui-Lorenzo S; López-Mahía P; Prada-Rodríguez D
Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Nov; 37(22):5262-7. PubMed ID: 14655716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Characterization of arsenic emissions from a coal-fired power plant].
Guo X; Zheng CG; Cheng D
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2006 Apr; 27(4):631-4. PubMed ID: 16767977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Study on emission of hazardous trace elements in a 350 MW coal-fired power plant. Part 1. Mercury.
Zhao S; Duan Y; Chen L; Li Y; Yao T; Liu S; Liu M; Lu J
Environ Pollut; 2017 Oct; 229():863-870. PubMed ID: 28779897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A new method to assess mercury emissions: a study of three coal-fired electric-generating power station configurations.
Boylan HM; Cain RD; Kingston HM
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2003 Nov; 53(11):1318-25. PubMed ID: 14649751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Denitrification devices in urban boilers change mercury isotope fractionation signatures of coal combustion products.
Yuan J; Sun R; Wang R; Fu B; Meng M; Zheng W; Chen J
Environ Pollut; 2021 Jan; 268(Pt B):115753. PubMed ID: 33045583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Distribution and Fate of Mercury in Pulverized Bituminous Coal-Fired Power Plants in Coal Energy-Dominant Huainan City, China.
Chen B; Liu G; Sun R
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2016 May; 70(4):724-33. PubMed ID: 26883032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speciation and mass-balance of mercury from pulverized coal fired power plants burning western Canadian subbituminous coals.
Goodarzi F
J Environ Monit; 2004 Oct; 6(10):792-8. PubMed ID: 15480492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mercury speciation and distribution in a 660-megawatt utility boiler in Taiwan firing bituminous coals.
Hsi HC; Lee HH; Hwang JF; Chen W
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2010 May; 60(5):514-22. PubMed ID: 20480850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Emission characteristics and removal of heavy metals in flue gas: a case study in waste incineration and coal-fired power plants.
Zhao B; Liu W; Wang X; Lu J
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Feb; 31(6):8883-8897. PubMed ID: 38180667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Distribution of mercury in the combustion products from coal-fired power plants in Guizhou, southwest China.
Liu S; Chen J; Cao Y; Yang H; Chen C; Jia W
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2019 Feb; 69(2):234-245. PubMed ID: 30396327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Understanding selected trace elements behavior in a coal-fired power plant in Malaysia for assessment of abatement technologies.
Mokhtar MM; Taib RM; Hassim MH
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2014 Aug; 64(8):867-78. PubMed ID: 25185389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigation of aerosol and gas emissions from a coal-fired power plant under various operating conditions.
Li Z; Wang Y; Lu Y; Biswas P
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2019 Jan; 69(1):34-46. PubMed ID: 30047848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Study of boron behaviour in two Spanish coal combustion power plants.
Ochoa-González R; Cuesta AF; Córdoba P; Díaz-Somoano M; Font O; López-Antón MA; Querol X; Martínez-Tarazona MR; Giménez A
J Environ Manage; 2011 Oct; 92(10):2586-9. PubMed ID: 21664037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mercury mass balances: a case study of two North Dakota power plants.
Laudal DL; Pavlish JH; Graves J; Stockdill D
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2000 Oct; 50(10):1798-804. PubMed ID: 11288308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Control strategies of atmospheric mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants in China.
Tian H; Wang Y; Cheng K; Qu Y; Hao J; Xue Z; Chai F
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 May; 62(5):576-86. PubMed ID: 22696807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Unusual speciation and retention of Hg at a coal-fired power plant.
Córdoba P; Maroto-Valer M; Ayora C; Perry R; Rallo M; Font O; Izquierdo M; Querol X
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jul; 46(14):7890-7. PubMed ID: 22702219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
