237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11032427)
1. Contaminated Department of Energy facilities and ecosystems: weighing the ecological risks.
Burger J
J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2000 Sep; 61(2):141-54. PubMed ID: 11032427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk valuation of ecological resources at contaminated deactivation and decommissioning facilities: methodology and a case study at the Department of Energy's Hanford site.
Burger J; Gochfeld M; Jeitner C
Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Jul; 190(8):478. PubMed ID: 30030638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of risk and future land use in cleanup decisions at the Department Of Energy.
Burger J; Powers C; Greenberg M; Gochfeld M
Risk Anal; 2004 Dec; 24(6):1539-49. PubMed ID: 15660610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Integrating long-term stewardship goals into the remediation process: natural resource damages and the Department of Energy.
Burger J; Gochfeld M; Powers CW
J Environ Manage; 2007 Jan; 82(2):189-99. PubMed ID: 16554118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Shifting priorities at the Department of Energy's bomb factories: protecting human and ecological health.
Burger J; Leschine TM; Greenberg M; Karr JR; Gochfeld M; Powers CW
Environ Manage; 2003 Feb; 31(2):157-67. PubMed ID: 12520373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk to ecological resources following remediation can be due mainly to increased resource value of successful restoration: A case study from the Department of Energy's Hanford Site.
Burger J; Gochfeld M; Kosson DS; Brown KG; Salisbury JA; Jeitner C
Environ Res; 2020 Jul; 186():109536. PubMed ID: 32344209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of ecological resources at operating facilities at contaminated sites: The Department of Energy's Hanford Site as a case study.
Burger J; Gochfeld M; Kosson DS; Brown KG; Salisbury JA; Jeitner C
Environ Res; 2019 Mar; 170():452-462. PubMed ID: 30640079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Integrating environmental restoration and ecological restoration: long-term stewardship at the department of energy.
Burger J
Environ Manage; 2000 Nov; 26(5):469-78. PubMed ID: 10982725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Protective sustainability of ecosystems using Department of Energy buffer lands as a case study.
Burger J
J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2007 Nov; 70(21):1815-23. PubMed ID: 17934954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Conceptual site models as a tool in evaluating ecological health: the case of the Department of Energy's Amchitka Island nuclear test site.
Burger J; Mayer HJ; Greenberg M; Powers CW; Volz CD; Gochfeld M
J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2006 Jul; 69(13):1217-38. PubMed ID: 16754537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Restoration, stewardship, environmental health, and policy: understanding stakeholders' perceptions.
Burger J
Environ Manage; 2002 Nov; 30(5):631-40. PubMed ID: 12375084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Using integrated geospatial mapping and conceptual site models to guide risk-based environmental clean-up decisions.
Mayer HJ; Greenberg MR; Burger J; Gochfield M; Powers C; Kosson D; Keren R; Danis C; Vyas V
Risk Anal; 2005 Apr; 25(2):429-46. PubMed ID: 15876215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Importance of buffer lands to determining risk to ecological resources at legacy contaminated sites: A case study for the Department of Energy's Hanford Site, Washington, USA.
Burger J; Gochfeld M; Jeitner C
J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2019; 82(22):1151-1163. PubMed ID: 31852396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Importance of implementation and residual risk analyses in sediment remediation.
Wenning RJ; Sorensen M; Magar VS
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2006 Jan; 2(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 16640319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A framework for increasing sustainability and reducing risk to ecological resources through integration of remediation planning and implementation.
Burger J
Environ Res; 2019 May; 172():586-595. PubMed ID: 30875512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Recreational rates and future land-use preferences for four Department of Energy sites: consistency despite demographic and geographical differences.
Burger J
Environ Res; 2004 Jun; 95(2):215-23. PubMed ID: 15147927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect on ecological systems of remediation to protect human health.
Burger J
Am J Public Health; 2007 Sep; 97(9):1572-8. PubMed ID: 17666693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The costs of delaying remediation on human, ecological, and eco-cultural resources: Considerations for the Department of Energy: A methodological framework.
Burger J; Gochfeld M; Kosson DS; Brown KG; Bliss LS; Bunn A; Clarke JH; Mayer HJ; Salisbury JA
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Feb; 649():1054-1064. PubMed ID: 30308877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Translating ecological risk to ecosystem service loss.
Munns WR; Helm RC; Adams WJ; Clements WH; Cramer MA; Curry M; DiPinto LM; Johns DM; Seiler R; Williams LL; Young D
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Oct; 5(4):500-14. PubMed ID: 19545189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
