161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11033190)
1. Three-dimensional dose distribution of tangential breast irradiation: results of a multicentre phantom dosimetry study.
Delaney G; Beckham W; Veness M; Ahern V; Back M; Boyages J; Fox C; Graham P; Jacob G; Lonergan D; Morgan G; Pendlebury S; Yuile P
Radiother Oncol; 2000 Oct; 57(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 11033190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contralateral breast dose after whole-breast irradiation: an analysis by treatment technique.
Williams TM; Moran JM; Hsu SH; Marsh R; Yanke B; Fraass BA; Pierce LJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Apr; 82(5):2079-85. PubMed ID: 21489713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intensity modulation to improve dose uniformity with tangential breast radiotherapy: initial clinical experience.
Kestin LL; Sharpe MB; Frazier RC; Vicini FA; Yan D; Matter RC; Martinez AA; Wong JW
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Dec; 48(5):1559-68. PubMed ID: 11121662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anthropomorphic breast phantoms for quality assurance and dose verification.
Bencomo JA; Chu C; Tello VM; Cho SH; Ibbott GS
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2004; 5(1):36-49. PubMed ID: 15753932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dosimetric assessment of static and helical TomoTherapy in the clinical implementation of breast cancer treatments.
Reynders T; Tournel K; De Coninck P; Heymann S; Vinh-Hung V; Van Parijs H; Duchateau M; Linthout N; Gevaert T; Verellen D; Storme G
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 19682758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Design of a slab phantom for breast dosimetry applications.
Ardekani MA; Haghparast M; Nourollahi S; Refahi S
J Cancer Res Ther; 2018; 14(5):1126-1129. PubMed ID: 30197361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Verification of tangential breast treatment dose calculations in a commercial 3D treatment planning system.
Baird CT; Starkschall G; Liu HH; Buchholz TA; Hogstrom KR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2001; 2(2):73-84. PubMed ID: 11604052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of Dose Calculation for Hemibody Treatments at Extended Distance Using a Commercial Treatment Planning System.
Batta Y; Juhasz J; Farrell T
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2019 Jun; 50(2):261-271. PubMed ID: 31176434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Multileaf field-in-field forward-planned intensity-modulated dose compensation for whole-breast irradiation is associated with reduced contralateral breast dose: a phantom model comparison.
Borghero YO; Salehpour M; McNeese MD; Stovall M; Smith SA; Johnson J; Perkins GH; Strom EA; Oh JL; Kirsner SM; Woodward WA; Yu TK; Buchholz TA
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Mar; 82(3):324-8. PubMed ID: 17157944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Monte Carlo simulations of a kilovoltage external beam radiotherapy system on phantoms and breast patients.
Breitkreutz DY; Weil MD; Zavgorodni S; Bazalova-Carter M
Med Phys; 2017 Dec; 44(12):6548-6559. PubMed ID: 28986987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dosimetric analysis of intact breast irradiation in off-axis planes.
Buchholz TA; Gurgoze E; Bice WS; Prestidge BR
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Aug; 39(1):261-7. PubMed ID: 9300762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality control in interstitial brachytherapy of the breast using pulsed dose rate: treatment planning and dose delivery with an Ir-192 afterloading system.
Mangold CA; Rijnders A; Georg D; Van Limbergen E; Pötter R; Huyskens D
Radiother Oncol; 2001 Jan; 58(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 11165681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of wedge versus segmented techniques in whole breast irradiation: effects on dose exposure outside the treatment volume.
Ludwig V; Schwab F; Guckenberger M; Krieger T; Flentje M
Strahlenther Onkol; 2008 Jun; 184(6):307-12. PubMed ID: 18535806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can radiation therapy treatment planning system accurately predict surface doses in postmastectomy radiation therapy patients?
Wong S; Back M; Tan PW; Lee KM; Baggarley S; Lu JJ
Med Dosim; 2012; 37(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 21865026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Dosimetric evaluation of intensity-modulated tangential beam versus conventional tangential irradiation for breast cancer].
Huang XB; Jiang GL; Chen JY; Chen LF; Hu WG
Ai Zheng; 2006 Jul; 25(7):855-60. PubMed ID: 16831277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.
Rana S; Zheng Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of superficial dosimetry between treatment planning system and measurement for several breast cancer treatment techniques.
Akino Y; Das IJ; Bartlett GK; Zhang H; Thompson E; Zook JE
Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011714. PubMed ID: 23298084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of two treatment techniques for breast irradiation including internal mammary nodes.
Allen SJ; Klein EE; Michaletz-Lorenz M; Jin JY
Med Dosim; 2004; 29(2):124-7. PubMed ID: 15191761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dosimetry around metallic ports in tissue expanders in patients receiving postmastectomy radiation therapy: an ex vivo evaluation.
Moni J; Graves-Ditman M; Cederna P; Griffith K; Krueger EA; Fraass BA; Pierce LJ
Med Dosim; 2004; 29(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 15023393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of measured and calculated absorbed doses from tangential irradiation of the breast.
Knöös T; Ahlgren L; Nilsson M
Radiother Oncol; 1986 Sep; 7(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 3775079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
