These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11033576)

  • 1. Definition of individual bioequivalence: occasion-to-occasion versus mean switchability.
    Kimanani EK
    Stat Med; 2000 Oct; 19(20):2797-810. PubMed ID: 11033576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A parametric confidence interval for a moment-based scaled criterion for individual bioequivalence.
    Kimanani EK; Potvin D
    J Pharmacokinet Biopharm; 1997 Oct; 25(5):595-614. PubMed ID: 9679224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prescribability and switchability of highly variable drugs and drug products.
    Midha KK; Rawson MJ; Hubbard JW
    J Control Release; 1999 Nov; 62(1-2):33-40. PubMed ID: 10518632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Some statistical considerations on the FDA draft guidance for individual bioequivalence.
    Hsuan FC
    Stat Med; 2000 Oct; 19(20):2879-84. PubMed ID: 11033582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A small sample confidence interval approach to assess individual bioequivalence.
    Hyslop T; Hsuan F; Holder DJ
    Stat Med; 2000 Oct; 19(20):2885-97. PubMed ID: 11033583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative assessment of the switchability of generic products.
    Karalis V; Bialer M; Macheras P
    Eur J Pharm Sci; 2013 Nov; 50(3-4):476-83. PubMed ID: 23981332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measuring switchability and prescribability: when is average bioequivalence sufficient?
    Hauck WW; Anderson S
    J Pharmacokinet Biopharm; 1994 Dec; 22(6):551-64. PubMed ID: 7473081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An individual bioequivalence criterion: regulatory considerations.
    Chen ML; Patnaik R; Hauck WW; Schuirmann DJ; Hyslop T; Williams R
    Stat Med; 2000 Oct; 19(20):2821-42. PubMed ID: 11033578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. PhRMA perspective on population and individual bioequivalence.
    Barrett JS; Batra V; Chow A; Cook J; Gould AL; Heller AH; Lo MW; Patterson SD; Smith BP; Stritar JA; Vega JM; Zariffa N
    J Clin Pharmacol; 2000 Jun; 40(6):561-70. PubMed ID: 10868305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing bioequivalence and drug interchangeability.
    Chen M; Chow SC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2017; 27(2):272-281. PubMed ID: 27936343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Numerical methods for the evaluation of individual bioequivalence criteria.
    Kimanani EK; Lavigne J; Potvin D
    Stat Med; 2000 Oct; 19(20):2775-95. PubMed ID: 11033575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Individual bioequivalence testing under 2x3 designs.
    Chow SC; Shao J; Wang H
    Stat Med; 2002 Mar; 21(5):629-48. PubMed ID: 11870806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical aspects of bioequivalence testing between two medicinal products.
    Zintzaras E
    Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet; 2005; 30(1-2):41-6. PubMed ID: 16010860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistical evaluation of the scaled criterion for drug interchangeability.
    Li J; Chow SC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2017; 27(2):282-292. PubMed ID: 27937059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Applying multilevel models in evaluation of bioequivalence (I)].
    Liu QL; Shen ZZ; Chen F; Li XS; Yang M
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Dec; 30(12):1302-6. PubMed ID: 20193320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Kullback-Leibler divergence for evaluating bioequivalence.
    Dragalin V; Fedorov V; Patterson S; Jones B
    Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(6):913-30. PubMed ID: 12627409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of the repeated cross-over designs in assessing bioequivalence.
    Liu JP
    Stat Med; 1995 May 15-30; 14(9-10):1067-78; discussion 1079-80. PubMed ID: 7569501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the reference scaled bioequivalence semi-replicate method with other approaches: focus on human exposure to drugs.
    Karalis V; Symillides M; Macheras P
    Eur J Pharm Sci; 2009 Aug; 38(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 19524039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Types of bioequivalence and related statistical considerations.
    Hauck WW; Anderson S
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol; 1992 May; 30(5):181-7. PubMed ID: 1592546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Generic lamotrigine versus brand-name Lamictal bioequivalence in patients with epilepsy: A field test of the FDA bioequivalence standard.
    Ting TY; Jiang W; Lionberger R; Wong J; Jones JW; Kane MA; Krumholz A; Temple R; Polli JE
    Epilepsia; 2015 Sep; 56(9):1415-24. PubMed ID: 26201987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.