These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11033663)
1. Improved technology makes autorefractors a fundamental part of today's busy office. Watson DM J Ophthalmic Nurs Technol; 2000; 19(1):11-2. PubMed ID: 11033663 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Digital instruments for the objective determination of ocular refraction]. Obućina D Med Arh; 1981; 35(4):213-5. PubMed ID: 7334854 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Ophthalmological equipments and devices at the Public Health-80 Exhibition]. Aĭzenshtat LI; Noskova AD; Tamarova RM; Filin VA Med Tekh; 1981; (2):45-9. PubMed ID: 7266314 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The phoropter trapeze. A portable refractive support for remote clinics. Arnold RW Binocul Vis Strabismus Q; 2003; 18(1):26-7. PubMed ID: 12597765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A clinical evaluation of the Nidek Autorefractor. Wood IC; Papas E; Burghardt D; Hardwick G Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1984; 4(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 6728478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The cost-effectiveness of technology transfer using telemedicine. Johnston K; Kennedy C; Murdoch I; Taylor P; Cook C Health Policy Plan; 2004 Sep; 19(5):302-9. PubMed ID: 15310665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use and misuse of autorefractors. Stokes HR Trans Pa Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1978; 31(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 725983 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The state of physician office-based health information technology in Connecticut: current use, barriers and future plans. Mattocks K; Lalime K; Tate JP; Giannotti TE; Carr K; Carrabba A; Blum T; Meehan TP Conn Med; 2007 Jan; 71(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 17288104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How to prepare your office for medical emergencies. Winbery S; Blaho K J Ophthalmic Nurs Technol; 2000; 19(4):164-5. PubMed ID: 11309989 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative evaluation of the Allergan Humphrey 570 and Canon RK-1 autorefractors: I. Objective autorefraction in normal subjects. Raj PS; Villada JR; Lewis AE; Joyce PW; Watson A Eye (Lond); 1992; 6 ( Pt 3)():284-6. PubMed ID: 1446760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [A device to determine sensitivity to glare]. Avetisov SE; Vergasova SS Vestn Oftalmol; 1991; 107(5):58-60. PubMed ID: 1763457 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A new ophthalmometer. LITTMANN H Am J Ophthalmol; 1953 Nov; 36(11):1540-5. PubMed ID: 13104561 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Management competencies for the POL (physician office laboratory): Part 1, Self-assessment. Pontius CA MLO Med Lab Obs; 2000 Jul; 32(7):28-30. PubMed ID: 11067539 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Evaluation of aids for the objective determination of ocular refraction based on a complex quality index]. Miagkikh TN Nov Med Tekh; 1976; (2):103-7. PubMed ID: 1032528 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of preschool vision screening tests as administered by licensed eye care professionals in the Vision In Preschoolers Study. Schmidt P; Maguire M; Dobson V; Quinn G; Ciner E; Cyert L; Kulp MT; Moore B; Orel-Bixler D; Redford M; Ying GS; Ophthalmology; 2004 Apr; 111(4):637-50. PubMed ID: 15051194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]