These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11033712)

  • 1. Why Sackett's analysis of randomized controlled trials fails, but needn't.
    Shapiro SH; Glass KC
    CMAJ; 2000 Oct; 163(7):834-5. PubMed ID: 11033712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Why randomized controlled trials fail but needn't: 1. Failure to gain "coal-face" commitment and to use the uncertainty principle.
    Sackett DL
    CMAJ; 2000 May; 162(9):1311-4. PubMed ID: 10813014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Equipoise, a term whose time (if it ever came) has surely gone.
    Sackett DL
    CMAJ; 2000 Oct; 163(7):835-6. PubMed ID: 11033713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Why randomized controlled trials fail but needn't: a new series is launched.
    Sackett DL; Hoey J
    CMAJ; 2000 May; 162(9):1301-2. PubMed ID: 10813012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Physicians needn't become health care's forgotten people.
    Conard RT
    Contemp Longterm Care; 1988 Mar; 11(3):82, 84. PubMed ID: 10287034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The physician's role, "sham surgery," and trust: a conflict of duties?
    Clark CC
    Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(4):57-8. PubMed ID: 14744337
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why randomized controlled trials fail but needn't: 2. Failure to employ physiological statistics, or the only formula a clinician-trialist is ever likely to need (or understand!).
    Sackett DL
    CMAJ; 2001 Oct; 165(9):1226-37. PubMed ID: 11706914
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Commentary: Measuring the success of blinding in RCTs: don't, must, can't or needn't?
    Sackett DL
    Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 36(3):664-5. PubMed ID: 17675306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Is mental health services research in need of randomised controlled trials?].
    Kallert TW
    Psychiatr Prax; 2005 Nov; 32(8):375-7. PubMed ID: 16308799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vulnerable subjects and civic professionalism: would six-sigma research and research ethics consultation solve the vulnerability problem?
    Marshall MF
    Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(3):54-5; discussion W32. PubMed ID: 16192141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How to resolve an ethical dilemma concerning randomized clinical trials.
    Marquis D
    N Engl J Med; 1999 Aug; 341(9):691-3. PubMed ID: 10460824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Ethical perspective or randomized controlled trials?].
    Ishay R
    Harefuah; 1992 Jun; 122(11):740-2. PubMed ID: 1526572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Molecular genetics: what's left for clinicians?
    Whisnant JP
    J Child Neurol; 1994 Oct; 9(4):349-51. PubMed ID: 7822722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcomes research in orthopaedics.
    Keller RB; Rudicel SA; Liang MH
    Instr Course Lect; 1994; 43():599-611. PubMed ID: 9097191
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why researchers cannot establish equipoise.
    Veatch RM
    Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(4):55-7. PubMed ID: 16885108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing risk of bias in randomized controlled trials.
    Purgato M; Barbui C; Cipriani A
    Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc; 2010; 19(4):296-7. PubMed ID: 21322502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Research on orthopaedic and casualty surgery in Germany].
    Niethard FU; Weise K
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Mar; 148(2):143-4. PubMed ID: 20376756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The patient and the public good.
    Hellman S
    Monash Bioeth Rev; 1996 Jan; 15(1):S5-10. PubMed ID: 15810187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biased articles.
    Friedman JH
    Med Health R I; 2009 Mar; 92(3):70. PubMed ID: 19385378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Methodological issues of randomized controlled trials for the evaluation of reproductive health interventions.
    Villar J; Carroli G
    Prev Med; 1996; 25(3):365-75. PubMed ID: 8781015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.