179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11034526)
1. Cost-effectiveness of screening programs for Chlamydia trachomatis: a population-based dynamic approach.
Welte R; Kretzschmar M; Leidl R; van den Hoek A; Jager JC; Postma MJ
Sex Transm Dis; 2000 Oct; 27(9):518-29. PubMed ID: 11034526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis in sexually active population of Amsterdam. II. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening women].
Postma MJ; Welte R; van den Hoek JA; van Doornum GJ; Coutinho RA; Jager JC
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Mar; 143(13):677-81. PubMed ID: 10321301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in asymptomatic women attending family planning clinics. A cost-effectiveness analysis of three strategies.
Howell MR; Quinn TC; Gaydos CA
Ann Intern Med; 1998 Feb; 128(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 9471930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Costs and effects of chlamydial screening: dynamic versus static modeling.
Welte R; Postma M; Leidl R; Kretzschmar M
Sex Transm Dis; 2005 Aug; 32(8):474-83. PubMed ID: 16041248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness of partner pharmacotherapy in screening women for asymptomatic infection with Chlamydia Trachomatis.
Postma MJ; Welte R; van den Hoek JA; van Doornum GJ; Jager HC; Coutinho RA
Value Health; 2001; 4(3):266-75. PubMed ID: 11705188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Screening for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infection in pregnancy; cost-effectiveness favorable at a minimum prevalence rate of 3% or more].
Postma MJ; Bakker A; Welte R; van Bergen JE; van den Hoek JA; de Jong-van den Berg LT; Jager JC
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Dec; 144(49):2350-4. PubMed ID: 11129971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost effectiveness analysis of a population based screening programme for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women by means of home obtained urine specimens.
van Valkengoed IG; Postma MJ; Morré SA; van den Brule AJ; Meijer CJ; Bouter LM; Boeke AJ
Sex Transm Infect; 2001 Aug; 77(4):276-82. PubMed ID: 11463928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in women 15 to 29 years of age: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Hu D; Hook EW; Goldie SJ
Ann Intern Med; 2004 Oct; 141(7):501-13. PubMed ID: 15466767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Systematic screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: estimating cost-effectiveness using dynamic modeling and Dutch data.
de Vries R; van Bergen JE; de Jong-van den Berg LT; Postma MJ;
Value Health; 2006; 9(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 16441519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness analysis of Chlamydia trachomatis screening in Dutch pregnant women.
Rours GI; Smith-Norowitz TA; Ditkowsky J; Hammerschlag MR; Verkooyen RP; de Groot R; Verbrugh HA; Postma MJ
Pathog Glob Health; 2016; 110(7-8):292-302. PubMed ID: 27958189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Epidemiological, social, diagnostic and economic evaluation of population screening for genital chlamydial infection.
Low N; McCarthy A; Macleod J; Salisbury C; Campbell R; Roberts TE; Horner P; Skidmore S; Sterne JA; Sanford E; Ibrahim F; Holloway A; Patel R; Barton PM; Robinson SM; Mills N; Graham A; Herring A; Caul EO; Davey Smith G; Hobbs FD; Ross JD; Egger M;
Health Technol Assess; 2007 Mar; 11(8):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-165. PubMed ID: 17311735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Control of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in female army recruits: cost-effective screening and treatment in training cohorts to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease.
Howell MR; Gaydos JC; McKee KT; Quinn TC; Gaydos CA
Sex Transm Dis; 1999 Oct; 26(9):519-26. PubMed ID: 10534206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Screening women for chlamydia trachomatis in family planning clinics: the cost-effectiveness of DNA amplification assays.
Howell MR; Quinn TC; Brathwaite W; Gaydos CA
Sex Transm Dis; 1998 Feb; 25(2):108-17. PubMed ID: 9518379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost effectiveness of home based population screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in the UK: economic evaluation of chlamydia screening studies (ClaSS) project.
Roberts TE; Robinson S; Barton PM; Bryan S; McCarthy A; Macleod J; Egger M; Low N
BMJ; 2007 Aug; 335(7614):291. PubMed ID: 17656504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Chlamydia trachomatis: impact on human reproduction.
Paavonen J; Eggert-Kruse W
Hum Reprod Update; 1999; 5(5):433-47. PubMed ID: 10582782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An evaluation of economics and acceptability of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection, in women attending antenatal, abortion, colposcopy and family planning clinics in Scotland, UK.
Norman JE; Wu O; Twaddle S; Macmillan S; McMillan L; Templeton A; McKenzie H; Noone A; Allardice G; Reid M
BJOG; 2004 Nov; 111(11):1261-8. PubMed ID: 15521872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of costs, effectiveness, and disease control of a population-based program using home sampling for diagnosis of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis Infections.
Andersen B; Gundgaard J; Kretzschmar M; Olsen J; Welte R; Oster-Gaard L
Sex Transm Dis; 2006 Jul; 33(7):407-15. PubMed ID: 16601656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Screening for chlamydial infection.
Nelson HD; Helfand M
Am J Prev Med; 2001 Apr; 20(3 Suppl):95-107. PubMed ID: 11306238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative model-based analysis of screening programs for Chlamydia trachomatis infections.
Kretzschmar M; Welte R; van den Hoek A; Postma MJ
Am J Epidemiol; 2001 Jan; 153(1):90-101. PubMed ID: 11159151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The cost and cost-effectiveness of opportunistic screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in Ireland.
Gillespie P; O'Neill C; Adams E; Turner K; O'Donovan D; Brugha R; Vaughan D; O'Connell E; Cormican M; Balfe M; Coleman C; Fitzgerald M; Fleming C
Sex Transm Infect; 2012 Apr; 88(3):222-8. PubMed ID: 22213681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
