BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11035892)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population.
    Frazier AL; Colditz GA; Fuchs CS; Kuntz KM
    JAMA; 2000 Oct; 284(15):1954-61. PubMed ID: 11035892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer.
    Sonnenberg A; Delcò F; Inadomi JM
    Ann Intern Med; 2000 Oct; 133(8):573-84. PubMed ID: 11033584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness analysis on screening for colorectal neoplasm and management of colorectal cancer in Asia.
    Tsoi KK; Ng SS; Leung MC; Sung JJ
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Aug; 28(3):353-63. PubMed ID: 18638075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.
    Sharaf RN; Ladabaum U
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jan; 108(1):120-32. PubMed ID: 23247579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost effectiveness and projected national impact of colorectal cancer screening in France.
    Hassan C; Benamouzig R; Spada C; Ponchon T; Zullo A; Saurin JC; Costamagna G
    Endoscopy; 2011 Sep; 43(9):780-93. PubMed ID: 21623557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of rising chemotherapy costs on the cost savings of colorectal cancer screening.
    Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; van Ballegooijen M; Zauber AG; Habbema JD; Kuipers EJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Oct; 101(20):1412-22. PubMed ID: 19779203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer.
    Dinh T; Ladabaum U; Alperin P; Caldwell C; Smith R; Levin TR
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Sep; 11(9):1158-66. PubMed ID: 23542330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening: comparison of community-based flexible sigmoidoscopy with fecal occult blood testing and colonoscopy.
    O'Leary BA; Olynyk JK; Neville AM; Platell CF
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2004 Jan; 19(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 14675241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness of screening the average-risk population for colorectal cancer.
    Provenzale D
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2002 Jan; 12(1):93-109. PubMed ID: 11916165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Which colon cancer screening test? A comparison of costs, effectiveness, and compliance.
    Vijan S; Hwang EW; Hofer TP; Hayward RA
    Am J Med; 2001 Dec; 111(8):593-601. PubMed ID: 11755501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modeling the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening: policy guidance based on patient preferences and compliance.
    Subramanian S; Bobashev G; Morris RJ
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2009 Jul; 18(7):1971-8. PubMed ID: 19567507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Options for screening for colorectal cancer in the Royal Air Force: a cost-effectiveness evaluation.
    Daniels K; McKee M
    J R Army Med Corps; 1995 Oct; 141(3):142-50. PubMed ID: 8568748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness of computed tomographic colonography screening for colorectal cancer in the medicare population.
    Knudsen AB; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Rutter CM; Savarino JE; van Ballegooijen M; Kuntz KM; Zauber AG
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Aug; 102(16):1238-52. PubMed ID: 20664028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aspirin as an adjunct to screening for prevention of sporadic colorectal cancer. A cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Ladabaum U; Chopra CL; Huang G; Scheiman JM; Chernew ME; Fendrick AM
    Ann Intern Med; 2001 Nov; 135(9):769-81. PubMed ID: 11694102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative effectiveness of screening strategies for colorectal cancer.
    Barzi A; Lenz HJ; Quinn DI; Sadeghi S
    Cancer; 2017 May; 123(9):1516-1527. PubMed ID: 28117881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-effectiveness simulation and analysis of colorectal cancer screening in Hong Kong Chinese population: comparison amongst colonoscopy, guaiac and immunologic fecal occult blood testing.
    Wong CK; Lam CL; Wan YF; Fong DY
    BMC Cancer; 2015 Oct; 15():705. PubMed ID: 26471036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fecal DNA testing compared with conventional colorectal cancer screening methods: a decision analysis.
    Song K; Fendrick AM; Ladabaum U
    Gastroenterology; 2004 May; 126(5):1270-9. PubMed ID: 15131787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative economic evaluation of data from the ACRIN National CT Colonography Trial with three cancer intervention and surveillance modeling network microsimulations.
    Vanness DJ; Knudsen AB; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Rutter CM; Gareen IF; Herman BA; Kuntz KM; Zauber AG; van Ballegooijen M; Feuer EJ; Chen MH; Johnson CD
    Radiology; 2011 Nov; 261(2):487-98. PubMed ID: 21813740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimates of costs and effects of screening for colorectal cancer in the United States.
    Byers T; Gorsky R
    Cancer; 1992 Sep; 70(5 Suppl):1288-95. PubMed ID: 1387342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Initial evaluation of rectal bleeding in young persons: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Lewis JD; Brown A; Localio AR; Schwartz JS
    Ann Intern Med; 2002 Jan; 136(2):99-110. PubMed ID: 11790061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 62.