219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11036103)
1. After 40 years, mammography remains as much emotion as science.
Randal J
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Oct; 92(20):1630-2. PubMed ID: 11036103
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Evidence of efficacy of mammographic screening for women in their forties.
Dupont WD
Cancer; 1994 Aug; 74(4):1204-6. PubMed ID: 8055438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A question that will not go away: at what age should mammographic screening begin?
Forrest AP; Alexander FE
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1995 Aug; 87(16):1195-7. PubMed ID: 7563158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. British trial aims to settle mammography questions.
Reynolds T
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1995 Mar; 87(5):338-41. PubMed ID: 7853413
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Biology and cost-benefit in mammography screening.
Rutqvist LE
Acta Oncol; 1997; 36(7):673-4. PubMed ID: 9490081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Cost-effectiveness analysis of breast cancer screening with mammography].
Iinuma T
Nihon Rinsho; 2007 Jun; 65 Suppl 6():226-8. PubMed ID: 17682158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Mammography and beyond: building better breast cancer screening tests.
Wang L
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Mar; 95(5):344-6. PubMed ID: 12618493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Mammography screening for breast cancer. Reply to the commentaries.
Kopans DB; Halpern E; Hulka CA
Cancer; 1994 Aug; 74(4):1212-6. PubMed ID: 8055440
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Mammography utilization, public health impact, and cost-effectiveness in the United States.
White E; Urban N; Taylor V
Annu Rev Public Health; 1993; 14():605-33. PubMed ID: 8323604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Screening for breast cancer.
Fletcher SW; Black W; Harris R; Rimer BK; Shapiro S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1994 Apr; 86(7):558-61. PubMed ID: 8133541
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Summaries for patients. Screening for breast cancer: recommendations from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
Ann Intern Med; 2002 Sep; 137(5 Part 1):I47. PubMed ID: 12204048
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Dangers and unreliability of mammography: breast examination is a safe, effective, and practical alternative.
Epstein SS; Bertell R; Seaman B
Int J Health Serv; 2001; 31(3):605-15. PubMed ID: 11562008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Screening for breast cancer in India--is it an appropriate strategy?
Moss S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Sep; 100(18):1270-1. PubMed ID: 18780862
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of screening mammography.
Stout NK; Rosenberg MA; Trentham-Dietz A; Smith MA; Robinson SM; Fryback DG
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Jun; 98(11):774-82. PubMed ID: 16757702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age.
Lisby MD
Am Fam Physician; 2004 Nov; 70(9):1750-2. PubMed ID: 15554494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The National Study of Breast Cancer Screening Protocol for a Canadian Randomized Controlled trial of screening for breast cancer in women.
Miller AB; Howe GR; Wall C
Clin Invest Med; 1981; 4(3-4):227-58. PubMed ID: 6802546
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Screening mammography for women under 50: considerations for fully informed decision making.
Ernster VL
Womens Health; 1996; 2(4):257-60; discussion 261-6. PubMed ID: 9453858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast cancer screening.
Overmoyer B
Med Clin North Am; 1999 Nov; 83(6):1443-66, vi-vii. PubMed ID: 10584602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Concerns about recommending routine screening mammograms for women aged 40-49 years.
Paykel J; Wolberg WH
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1997 Jun; 89(12):889. PubMed ID: 9196257
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. NCI reverses one expert panel, sides with another.
Taubes G
Science; 1997 Apr; 276(5309):27-8. PubMed ID: 9122702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
