232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11036111)
1. Predicting the cumulative risk of false-positive mammograms.
Christiansen CL; Wang F; Barton MB; Kreuter W; Elmore JG; Gelfand AE; Fletcher SW
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2000 Oct; 92(20):1657-66. PubMed ID: 11036111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of false-positive mammograms on interval breast cancer screening in a health maintenance organization.
Burman ML; Taplin SH; Herta DF; Elmore JG
Ann Intern Med; 1999 Jul; 131(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10391809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations.
Elmore JG; Barton MB; Moceri VM; Polk S; Arena PJ; Fletcher SW
N Engl J Med; 1998 Apr; 338(16):1089-96. PubMed ID: 9545356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of age and breast density on screening mammograms with false-positive findings.
Lehman CD; White E; Peacock S; Drucker MJ; Urban N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Dec; 173(6):1651-5. PubMed ID: 10584815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of protocol-related variables and women's characteristics on the cumulative false-positive risk in breast cancer screening.
Román R; Sala M; Salas D; Ascunce N; Zubizarreta R; Castells X
Ann Oncol; 2012 Jan; 23(1):104-111. PubMed ID: 21430183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cumulative false positive recall rate and association with participant related factors in a population based breast cancer screening programme.
Castells X; Molins E; Macià F
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2006 Apr; 60(4):316-21. PubMed ID: 16537348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Decreasing women's anxieties after abnormal mammograms: a controlled trial.
Barton MB; Morley DS; Moore S; Allen JD; Kleinman KP; Emmons KM; Fletcher SW
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Apr; 96(7):529-38. PubMed ID: 15069115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Increased patient concern after false-positive mammograms: clinician documentation and subsequent ambulatory visits.
Barton MB; Moore S; Polk S; Shtatland E; Elmore JG; Fletcher SW
J Gen Intern Med; 2001 Mar; 16(3):150-6. PubMed ID: 11318909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of false-positive mammograms on return for subsequent screening mammography.
Pinckney RG; Geller BM; Burman M; Littenberg B
Am J Med; 2003 Feb; 114(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 12586231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of false-positives and women's characteristics on long-term adherence to breast cancer screening.
Román R; Sala M; De La Vega M; Natal C; Galceran J; González-Román I; Baroja A; Zubizarreta R; Ascunce N; Salas D; Castells X
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Nov; 130(2):543-52. PubMed ID: 21617920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of a false-positive mammogram on a woman's subsequent behaviour for detecting breast cancer.
Lampic C; Thurfjell E; Sjödén PO
Eur J Cancer; 2003 Aug; 39(12):1730-7. PubMed ID: 12888368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of abnormal mammograms on psychosocial outcomes and subsequent screening.
Lipkus IM; Halabi S; Strigo TS; Rimer BK
Psychooncology; 2000; 9(5):402-10. PubMed ID: 11038478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Screening mammograms by community radiologists: variability in false-positive rates.
Elmore JG; Miglioretti DL; Reisch LM; Barton MB; Kreuter W; Christiansen CL; Fletcher SW
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Sep; 94(18):1373-80. PubMed ID: 12237283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of first mammography examination in women younger than 40 years.
Yankaskas BC; Haneuse S; Kapp JM; Kerlikowske K; Geller B; Buist DS;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 May; 102(10):692-701. PubMed ID: 20439838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Frequency and predictive value of a mammographic recommendation for short-interval follow-up.
Yasmeen S; Romano PS; Pettinger M; Chlebowski RT; Robbins JA; Lane DS; Hendrix SL
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2003 Mar; 95(6):429-36. PubMed ID: 12644536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of a False-Positive Screening Mammogram on Subsequent Screening Behavior and Stage at Breast Cancer Diagnosis.
Dabbous FM; Dolecek TA; Berbaum ML; Friedewald SM; Summerfelt WT; Hoskins K; Rauscher GH
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2017 Mar; 26(3):397-403. PubMed ID: 28183826
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Screening mammography for frail older women: what are the burdens?
Walter LC; Eng C; Covinsky KE
J Gen Intern Med; 2001 Nov; 16(11):779-84. PubMed ID: 11722693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimizing misclassification of hormone users at mammography screening.
Njor SH; Pedersen AT; Schwartz W; Hallas J; Lynge E
Int J Cancer; 2009 May; 124(9):2159-65. PubMed ID: 19132752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening outcomes in older US women undergoing multiple mammograms in community practice: does interval, age, or comorbidity score affect tumor characteristics or false positive rates?
Braithwaite D; Zhu W; Hubbard RA; O'Meara ES; Miglioretti DL; Geller B; Dittus K; Moore D; Wernli KJ; Mandelblatt J; Kerlikowske K;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Mar; 105(5):334-41. PubMed ID: 23385442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Compliance With Screening Mammography Guidelines After a False-Positive Mammogram.
Hardesty LA; Lind KE; Gutierrez EJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Sep; 13(9):1032-8. PubMed ID: 27233908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
