These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11037048)
1. Focused attention in anhedonia: a P3 study. Dubal S; Pierson A; Jouvent R Psychophysiology; 2000 Sep; 37(5):711-4. PubMed ID: 11037048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Severity of AD/HD symptoms and efficiency of attentional resource allocation. Sawaki R; Katayama J Neurosci Lett; 2006 Oct; 407(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 16949203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention. Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Attentional factors in response time variability after traumatic brain injury: an ERP study. Segalowitz SJ; Dywan J; Unsal A J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 1997 Mar; 3(2):95-107. PubMed ID: 9126851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Processing capacity in chronic pain patients: a visual event-related potentials study. Veldhuijzen DS; Kenemans JL; van Wijck AJ; Olivier B; Kalkman CJ; Volkerts ER Pain; 2006 Mar; 121(1-2):60-8. PubMed ID: 16480825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Task switching and novelty processing activate a common neural network for cognitive control. Barcelo F; Escera C; Corral MJ; Periáñez JA J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Oct; 18(10):1734-48. PubMed ID: 17014377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Resource allocation and somatosensory P300 amplitude during dual task: effects of tracking speed and predictability of tracking direction. Kida T; Nishihira Y; Hatta A; Wasaka T; Tazoe T; Sakajiri Y; Nakata H; Kaneda T; Kuroiwa K; Akiyama S; Sakamoto M; Kamijo K; Higashiura T Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Nov; 115(11):2616-28. PubMed ID: 15465451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Behavioural and neurophysiological correlates of dyslexia in the continuous performance task. Taroyan NA; Nicolson RI; Fawcett AJ Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 118(4):845-55. PubMed ID: 17317301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cognitive control after distraction: event-related brain potentials (ERPs) dissociate between different processes of attentional allocation. Berti S Psychophysiology; 2008 Jul; 45(4):608-20. PubMed ID: 18346043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The auditory-evoked N2 and P3 components in the stop-signal task: indices of inhibition, response-conflict or error-detection? Dimoska A; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ Brain Cogn; 2006 Nov; 62(2):98-112. PubMed ID: 16814442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gender-selective effects of the P300 and N400 components of the visual evoked potential. Steffensen SC; Ohran AJ; Shipp DN; Hales K; Stobbs SH; Fleming DE Vision Res; 2008 Mar; 48(7):917-25. PubMed ID: 18291436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Level of interest in video clips modulates event-related potentials to auditory probes. Suzuki J; Nittono H; Hori T Int J Psychophysiol; 2005 Jan; 55(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 15598514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Two Simon tasks with different sources of conflict: an ERP study of motion- and location-based compatibility effects. Galashan D; Wittfoth M; Fehr T; Herrmann M Biol Psychol; 2008 Jul; 78(3):246-52. PubMed ID: 18436365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The nature of switch cost: task set configuration or carry-over effect? Hsieh S; Liu LC Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Feb; 22(2):165-75. PubMed ID: 15653291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Event-related potentials in adolescents with schizophrenia and their siblings: a comparison with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Groom MJ; Bates AT; Jackson GM; Calton TG; Liddle PF; Hollis C Biol Psychiatry; 2008 Apr; 63(8):784-92. PubMed ID: 17977520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perceptual and cognitive task difficulty has differential effects on auditory distraction. Muller-Gass A; Schröger E Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 1136(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 17223092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can subitizing survive the attentional blink? An ERP study. Xu X; Liu C Neurosci Lett; 2008 Aug; 440(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 18556118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. P300-based Stroop study with low probability and target Stroop oddballs: the evidence still favors the response selection hypothesis. Rosenfeld JP; Skogsberg KR Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Jun; 60(3):240-50. PubMed ID: 16102861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]