These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11037326)

  • 41. On a family-based haplotype pattern mining method for linkage disequilibrium mapping.
    Zhang S; Zhang K; Li J; Zhao H
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2002; ():100-11. PubMed ID: 11928467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Association tests in nuclear families.
    Siegmund KD; Gauderman WJ
    Hum Hered; 2001; 52(2):66-76. PubMed ID: 11474207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. From genetics to mechanism of disease liability.
    Rohrwasser A; Lott P; Weiss RB; Lalouel JM
    Adv Genet; 2008; 60():701-26. PubMed ID: 18358337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A comparison of methods for intermediate fine mapping.
    Papachristou C; Lin S
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 30(8):677-89. PubMed ID: 16917817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. How can maximum likelihood methods reveal candidate gene effects on a quantitative trait?
    Martinez M; Abel L; Demenais F
    Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(6):789-94. PubMed ID: 8788010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Linkage and association with structural relationships.
    Province MA
    Adv Genet; 2001; 42():183-90. PubMed ID: 11037321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Affected-sib-pair test for linkage based on constraints for identical-by-descent distributions corresponding to disease models with imprinting.
    Knapp M; Strauch K
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 May; 26(4):273-85. PubMed ID: 15095387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Optimal selection strategies for QTL mapping using pooled DNA samples.
    Jawaid A; Bader JS; Purcell S; Cherny SS; Sham P
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2002 Feb; 10(2):125-32. PubMed ID: 11938443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Major strengths and weaknesses of the lod score method.
    Ott J
    Adv Genet; 2001; 42():125-32. PubMed ID: 11037318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Meta-analysis of genetic association studies: methodologies, between-study heterogeneity and winner's curse.
    Nakaoka H; Inoue I
    J Hum Genet; 2009 Nov; 54(11):615-23. PubMed ID: 19851339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Robust LOD scores for variance component-based linkage analysis.
    Blangero J; Williams JT; Almasy L
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000; 19 Suppl 1():S8-14. PubMed ID: 11055364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. An efficient, robust and unified method for mapping complex traits (III): combined linkage/linkage-disequilibrium analysis.
    Zhao LP; Quiaoit F; Aragaki C; Hsu L
    Am J Med Genet; 1999 Jun; 84(5):433-53. PubMed ID: 10360398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Tests of linkage and heterogeneity in Mendelian diseases using identity by descent scores.
    Chakravarti A; Badner JA; Li CC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1987; 4(4):255-66. PubMed ID: 3666434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. High-resolution joint linkage disequilibrium and linkage mapping of quantitative trait loci based on sibship data.
    Fan R; Jung J
    Hum Hered; 2003; 56(4):166-87. PubMed ID: 15031619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The null distribution of the heterogeneity lod score does depend on the assumed genetic model for the trait.
    Huang J; Vieland VJ
    Hum Hered; 2001; 52(4):217-22. PubMed ID: 11713418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Simultaneous discovery, estimation and prediction analysis of complex traits using a bayesian mixture model.
    Moser G; Lee SH; Hayes BJ; Goddard ME; Wray NR; Visscher PM
    PLoS Genet; 2015 Apr; 11(4):e1004969. PubMed ID: 25849665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Limits of fine-mapping a quantitative trait.
    Atwood LD; Heard-Costa NL
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Feb; 24(2):99-106. PubMed ID: 12548671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Bias of the estimated recombination fraction and lod score due to an association between a disease gene and a marker gene.
    Clerget-Darpoux F
    Ann Hum Genet; 1982 Oct; 46(4):363-72. PubMed ID: 6961885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Classification methods for confronting heterogeneity.
    Province MA; Shannon WD; Rao DC
    Adv Genet; 2001; 42():273-86. PubMed ID: 11037327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.