These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11037337)
1. False positives and false negatives in genome scans. Rao DC; Gu C Adv Genet; 2001; 42():487-98. PubMed ID: 11037337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sequential methods of analysis for genome scans. Province MA Adv Genet; 2001; 42():499-514. PubMed ID: 11037338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. CAT scans, PET scans, and genomic scans. Rao DC Genet Epidemiol; 1998; 15(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 9523207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Trade-off between false positives and false negatives in the linkage analysis of complex traits. Todorov AA; Rao DC Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(5):453-64. PubMed ID: 9358264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multiple testing in large-scale genetic studies. Bouaziz M; Jeanmougin M; Guedj M Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 888():213-33. PubMed ID: 22665284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A single, sequential, genome-wide test to identify simultaneously all promising areas in a linkage scan. Province MA Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Dec; 19(4):301-22. PubMed ID: 11108641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using biological data from field studies with multiple reference sites as a basis for environmental management: the risks for false positives and false negatives. Hanson N J Environ Manage; 2011 Mar; 92(3):610-9. PubMed ID: 21035245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An effective method for controlling false discovery and false nondiscovery rates in genome-scale RNAi screens. Zhang XD J Biomol Screen; 2010 Oct; 15(9):1116-22. PubMed ID: 20855561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Significance levels in genome scans. Thomson G Adv Genet; 2001; 42():475-86. PubMed ID: 11037336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Are false positives in suicide classification models a risk group? Evidence for "true alarms" in a population-representative longitudinal study of Norwegian adolescents. Haghish EF; Laeng B; Czajkowski N Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1216483. PubMed ID: 37780152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stratified false discovery control for large-scale hypothesis testing with application to genome-wide association studies. Sun L; Craiu RV; Paterson AD; Bull SB Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Sep; 30(6):519-30. PubMed ID: 16800000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Balancing false positives and false negatives for the detection of differential expression in malignancies. De Smet F; Moreau Y; Engelen K; Timmerman D; Vergote I; De Moor B Br J Cancer; 2004 Sep; 91(6):1160-5. PubMed ID: 15354216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. True and false positive peaks in genomewide scans: The long and the short of it. Visscher P; Haley C Genet Epidemiol; 2001 May; 20(4):409-14. PubMed ID: 11319782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of False-Positive Deletions from the Database of Genomic Variants. Duan J; Liu H; Zhao L; Yuan X; Wang YP; Wan M Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():8420547. PubMed ID: 31080831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. False and true positives in arthropod thermal adaptation candidate gene lists. Herrmann M; Yampolsky LY Genetica; 2021 Jun; 149(3):143-153. PubMed ID: 33963492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detecting false positives in multielement designs: implications for brief assessments. Bartlett SM; Rapp JT; Henrickson ML Behav Modif; 2011 Nov; 35(6):531-52. PubMed ID: 21873369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Underperformance of Contemporary Phase III Oncology Trials and Strategies for Improvement. Shen C; Ferro EG; Xu H; Kramer DB; Patell R; Kazi DS J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2021 Jun; 19(9):1072-1078. PubMed ID: 34153943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimating false positives and negatives in brain networks. de Reus MA; van den Heuvel MP Neuroimage; 2013 Apr; 70():402-9. PubMed ID: 23296185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improved flagging rates on the Sysmex XE-5000 compared with the XE-2100 reduce the number of manual film reviews and increase laboratory productivity. Briggs CJ; Linssen J; Longair I; Machin SJ Am J Clin Pathol; 2011 Aug; 136(2):309-16. PubMed ID: 21757605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]