These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11040746)

  • 1. Induction of labour for suspected fetal macrosomia.
    Anderson T
    Pract Midwife; 2000 Feb; 3(2):10-1. PubMed ID: 11040746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Management of suspected fetal macrosomia.
    Zamorski MA; Biggs WS
    Am Fam Physician; 2001 Jan; 63(2):302-6. PubMed ID: 11201695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Fetal macrosomia and labor induction: for lack of evidence, we randomize].
    Boulvain M; Epiney M; Morales MA
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Dec; 34(12):1190-3. PubMed ID: 17092754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Fetal macrosomia and labor induction: we are definitely against it].
    Sentilhes L; Verspyck E
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Dec; 34(12):1186-9. PubMed ID: 17092758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Induction of labor when a large fetus is suspected].
    Larsen JS; Pedersen OD; Ipsen L
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1991 Jan; 153(3):181-3. PubMed ID: 1998237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Treatment of suspected fetal macrosomia: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Herbst MA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Sep; 193(3 Pt 2):1035-9. PubMed ID: 16157107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Is induced labor justified in diabetes, macrosomia and prolonged pregnancy?].
    Treisser A; Dreyfus M
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1995; 24(1 Suppl):41-7. PubMed ID: 8550975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical inquiries. Should induction of labor be considered in a woman with a macrosomic baby?
    Ruplinger J; Marquardt DN
    J Fam Pract; 2001 Sep; 50(9):745-8. PubMed ID: 11674904
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Practice Bulletin No. 173: Fetal Macrosomia.
    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics
    Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 128(5):e195-e209. PubMed ID: 27776071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Suspected large fetus in the last period of pregnancy--a difficult problem].
    Haram K; Bergsjø P; Pirhonen J
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2001 Apr; 121(11):1369-73. PubMed ID: 11419107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Expectant management versus labor induction for suspected fetal macrosomia: a systematic review.
    Sanchez-Ramos L; Bernstein S; Kaunitz AM
    Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Nov; 100(5 Pt 1):997-1002. PubMed ID: 12423867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Suspected macrosomia: will induction of labour modify the risk of caesarean delivery?
    Cohain JS
    BJOG; 2012 Jul; 119(8):1016-7; author reply 1017. PubMed ID: 22703425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ACOG issues guidelines on fetal macrosomia. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
    Chatfield J
    Am Fam Physician; 2001 Jul; 64(1):169-70. PubMed ID: 11456432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Suspected Macrosomic Fetus at Term: A Clinical Dilemma.
    Ray EM; Alhusen JL
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2016; 61(2):263-9. PubMed ID: 26869131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fetal macrosomia in non-diabetic mothers: antenatal diagnosis and delivery outcome.
    Bailey C; Kalu E
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Apr; 29(3):206-8. PubMed ID: 19358025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of a policy of elective cesarean delivery in cases of suspected fetal macrosomia on the incidence of brachial plexus injury and the rate of cesarean delivery.
    Gonen R; Bader D; Ajami M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Nov; 183(5):1296-300. PubMed ID: 11084580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Prolonged pregnancy].
    Vial Y
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1992; 252 Suppl():S58-69. PubMed ID: 1482207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Temporal changes in rates and reasons for medical induction of term labor, 1980-1996.
    Yawn BP; Wollan P; McKeon K; Field CS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Mar; 184(4):611-9. PubMed ID: 11262461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Induction of labor with three different techniques at 41 weeks of gestation or spontaneous follow-up until 42 weeks in women with definitely unfavorable cervical scores.
    Gelisen O; Caliskan E; Dilbaz S; Ozdas E; Dilbaz B; Ozdas E; Haberal A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Jun; 120(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 15925045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Induction of labour: benefits and risks].
    Boulvain M; Meyer NJ
    Rev Med Suisse; 2015 Oct; 11(492):2011-2, 2014-5. PubMed ID: 26672180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.