461 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11040903)
1. Screening for diabetic retinopathy using digital colour photography and oral fluorescein angiography.
Newsom R; Moate B; Casswell T
Eye (Lond); 2000 Aug; 14 ( Pt 4)():579-82. PubMed ID: 11040903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.
Rudnisky CJ; Tennant MT; Weis E; Ting A; Hinz BJ; Greve MD
Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1748-54. PubMed ID: 17368543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of mydriasis and different field strategies on digital image screening of diabetic eye disease.
Murgatroyd H; Ellingford A; Cox A; Binnie M; Ellis JD; MacEwen CJ; Leese GP
Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 88(7):920-4. PubMed ID: 15205238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is screening with digital imaging using one retinal view adequate?
Herbert HM; Jordan K; Flanagan DW
Eye (Lond); 2003 May; 17(4):497-500. PubMed ID: 12802350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of optometry vs digital photography screening for diabetic retinopathy in a single district.
Tu KL; Palimar P; Sen S; Mathew P; Khaleeli A
Eye (Lond); 2004 Jan; 18(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 14707956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Screening of diabetic retinopathy: effect of field number and mydriasis on sensitivity and specificity of digital fundus photography.
Aptel F; Denis P; Rouberol F; Thivolet C
Diabetes Metab; 2008 Jun; 34(3):290-3. PubMed ID: 18406188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening for diabetic retinopathy by ophthalmologists and endocrinologists with pupillary dilation and a nonmydriatic digital camera.
Deb-Joardar N; Germain N; Thuret G; Manoli P; Garcin AF; Millot L; Gavet Y; Estour B; Gain P
Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Nov; 140(5):814-821. PubMed ID: 16310458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of a digital retinal imaging system and seven-field stereo color fundus photography to detect diabetic retinopathy in the primary care environment.
Schiffman RM; Jacobsen G; Nussbaum JJ; Desai UR; Carey JD; Glasser D; Zimmer-Galler IE; Zeimer R; Goldberg MF
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2005; 36(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 15688971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Screening for diabetic retinopathy by one-field, non-mydriatic, 45 degrees digital photography is inadequate.
Kuo HK; Hsieh HH; Liu RT
Ophthalmologica; 2005; 219(5):292-6. PubMed ID: 16123556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sensitivity and specificity of digital retinal imaging for screening diabetic retinopathy.
Lopez-Bastida J; Cabrera-Lopez F; Serrano-Aguilar P
Diabet Med; 2007 Apr; 24(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 17298591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparative evaluation of digital imaging, retinal photography and optometrist examination in screening for diabetic retinopathy.
Olson JA; Strachan FM; Hipwell JH; Goatman KA; McHardy KC; Forrester JV; Sharp PF
Diabet Med; 2003 Jul; 20(7):528-34. PubMed ID: 12823232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interobserver agreement in the interpretation of single-field digital fundus images for diabetic retinopathy screening.
Ruamviboonsuk P; Teerasuwanajak K; Tiensuwan M; Yuttitham K;
Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):826-32. PubMed ID: 16650679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Beyond retinal screening: digital imaging in the assessment and follow-up of patients with diabetic retinopathy.
Kerr D; Cavan DA; Jennings B; Dunnington C; Gold D; Crick M
Diabet Med; 1998 Oct; 15(10):878-82. PubMed ID: 9796890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sensitivity and specificity of digital retinal images in grading diabetic retinopathy.
Saari JM; Summanen P; Kivelä T; Saari KM
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Apr; 82(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 15043527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of digital retinal images and 35 mm colour transparencies in detecting and grading diabetic retinopathy.
George LD; Halliwell M; Hill R; Aldington SJ; Lusty J; Dunstan F; Owens DR
Diabet Med; 1998 Mar; 15(3):250-3. PubMed ID: 9545127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening for sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy: comparison of fundus photography with automated color contrast threshold test.
Ong GL; Ripley LG; Newsom RS; Cooper M; Casswell AG
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Mar; 137(3):445-52. PubMed ID: 15013866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can digitised colour 35 mm transparencies be used to diagnose diabetic retinopathy?
George LD; Leverton C; Young S; Lusty J; Dunstan FD; Owens DR
Diabet Med; 1997 Nov; 14(11):970-3. PubMed ID: 9400922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of digital fundus photography in diabetic retinopathy screening. Digital Diabetic Screening Group (DDSG).
Lin DY; Blumenkranz MS; Brothers R
Diabetes Technol Ther; 1999; 1(4):477-87. PubMed ID: 11484714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diabetic retinopathy screening using digital non-mydriatic fundus photography and automated image analysis.
Hansen AB; Hartvig NV; Jensen MS; Borch-Johnsen K; Lund-Andersen H; Larsen M
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Dec; 82(6):666-72. PubMed ID: 15606461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Screening for diabetic retinopathy using a digital non-mydriatic camera compared with standard 35-mm stereo colour transparencies.
Hansen AB; Sander B; Larsen M; Kleener J; Borch-Johnsen K; Klein R; Lund-Andersen H
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Dec; 82(6):656-65. PubMed ID: 15606460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
