124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11041757)
1. Observational studies and randomized trials.
Kunz R; Khan KS; Neumayer HH
N Engl J Med; 2000 Oct; 343(16):1194-5; author reply 1196-7. PubMed ID: 11041757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. How to make sense of clinical research.
Wooten JM; Ross VM
RN; 2005 Jan; 68(1):22-7; quiz 28. PubMed ID: 15742745
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Observational studies and randomized trials.
Liu PY; Anderson G; Crowley JJ
N Engl J Med; 2000 Oct; 343(16):1195; author reply 1196-7. PubMed ID: 11041758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Randomized trials or observational tribulations?
Pocock SJ; Elbourne DR
N Engl J Med; 2000 Jun; 342(25):1907-9. PubMed ID: 10861329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
Shrier I; Boivin JF; Steele RJ; Platt RW; Furlan A; Kakuma R; Brophy J; Rossignol M
Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 166(10):1203-9. PubMed ID: 17712019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Observational studies and randomized trials.
Smith RP; Meier P
N Engl J Med; 2000 Oct; 343(16):1196; author reply 1196-7. PubMed ID: 11041761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Re: Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
Pereira C; Castilho E
Am J Epidemiol; 2009 Mar; 169(6):783; author reply 783-4. PubMed ID: 19208724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Lying with statistic--today: the meta-analysis].
Gogol M
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2010 Mar; 135(9):419; author reply 419-20. PubMed ID: 20180169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Commentary: Empirical evidence of attrition bias in clinical trials.
Jüni P; Egger M
Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 34(1):87-8. PubMed ID: 15649954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Network meta-analysis incorporating randomized controlled trials and non-randomized comparative cohort studies for assessing the safety and effectiveness of medical treatments: challenges and opportunities.
Cameron C; Fireman B; Hutton B; Clifford T; Coyle D; Wells G; Dormuth CR; Platt R; Toh S
Syst Rev; 2015 Nov; 4():147. PubMed ID: 26537988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Clinical studies in traumatology: I. Study designs].
Sauerland S; Stengel D
Unfallchirurg; 2003 Aug; 106(8):690-1. PubMed ID: 12955242
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Meta-analysis and meta-analytic monitoring of clinical trials.
Feinstein AR
Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(12):1273-80; discussion 1281-3. PubMed ID: 8817801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Graphical methods for detecting bias in meta-analysis.
Ferrer RL
Fam Med; 1998 Sep; 30(8):579-83. PubMed ID: 9773289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Observational evidence.
Hennekens CH; Buring JE
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1993 Dec; 703():18-24; discussion 24. PubMed ID: 8192295
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Fables or foibles: inherent problems with RCTs.
Rosner A
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2003 Sep; 26(7):460-7. PubMed ID: 12975633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Standardized mean differences in individually-randomized and cluster-randomized trials, with applications to meta-analysis.
White IR; Thomas J
Clin Trials; 2005; 2(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 16279136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A meta-epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials.
Bialy L; Vandermeer B; Lacaze-Masmonteil T; Dryden DM; Hartling L
Evid Based Child Health; 2014 Dec; 9(4):1052-9. PubMed ID: 25504975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Understanding research: 1. Methodologies used to answer research questions.
Baxter H
J Wound Care; 2001 Jul; 10(7):269-72. PubMed ID: 12964346
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomized and nonrandomized studies: complementary or competing?
Pandis N; Tu YK; Fleming PS; Polychronopoulou A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):633-40. PubMed ID: 25439214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Considerations for planning and designing meta-analysis in oral medicine.
Pinto A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Aug; 116(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 23663987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
