These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11041757)

  • 41. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
    Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Evidence-based dentistry. How to use it.
    Seidel-Bittke D
    Dent Today; 2003 Mar; 22(3):50-5. PubMed ID: 12705010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. PEDro's bias: summary quality scores should not be used in meta-analysis.
    da Costa BR; Hilfiker R; Egger M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jan; 66(1):75-7. PubMed ID: 23177896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [How (in-)complete are study reports?].
    Rakowitz B
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2011 Apr; 136(15):752. PubMed ID: 21488003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. From randomized controlled trials to observational studies.
    Silverman SL
    Am J Med; 2009 Feb; 122(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 19185083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Subjecting meta-analyses to closer scrutiny: Little support for differential efficacy among second-generation antipsychotics at equivalent doses.
    Tandon R; Nasrallah HA
    Arch Gen Psychiatry; 2006 Aug; 63(8):935-7; author reply 937-9. PubMed ID: 16894070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The promise and problems of meta-analysis.
    Bailar JC
    N Engl J Med; 1997 Aug; 337(8):559-61. PubMed ID: 9262502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Methods in epidemiology: observational study designs.
    DiPietro NA
    Pharmacotherapy; 2010 Oct; 30(10):973-84. PubMed ID: 20874034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Metabias: a challenge for comparative effectiveness research.
    Goodman S; Dickersin K
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):61-2. PubMed ID: 21727295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [A wide perspective on meta-analysis--may be of crucial significance for the patients].
    Gøtzsche PC
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2000 Sep; 120(23):2810. PubMed ID: 11107932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. When are observational studies as credible as randomised trials?
    Vandenbroucke JP
    Lancet; 2004 May; 363(9422):1728-31. PubMed ID: 15158638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. On ideals of objectivity, judgments, and bias in medical research - A comment on Stegenga.
    Jukola S
    Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2017 Apr; 62():35-41. PubMed ID: 28188111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Methodology and application of clinical trials in radiology: self-assessment module.
    Black WC; Krupinski EA; Relyea-Chew A; Chew FS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Mar; 190(3 Suppl):S23-8. PubMed ID: 18321845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Robustness assessments are needed to reduce bias in meta-analyses that include zero-event randomized trials.
    Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Mar; 104(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 19262513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Adjustment of meta-analyses on the basis of quality scores should be abandoned.
    Herbison P; Hay-Smith J; Gillespie WJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 59(12):1249-56. PubMed ID: 17098567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Can quality of clinical trials and meta-analyses be quantified?
    Ioannidis JP; Lau J
    Lancet; 1998 Aug; 352(9128):590-1. PubMed ID: 9746014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Introduction to observational studies: part 2.
    Pandis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Feb; 145(2):268-9. PubMed ID: 24485743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Publication bias and the efficacy of antidepressants.
    Mathew SJ; Charney DS
    Am J Psychiatry; 2009 Feb; 166(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 19188290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Potential and pitfalls of randomized clinical trials in cancer research.
    Buyse ME
    Cancer Surv; 1989; 8(1):91-105. PubMed ID: 2804990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies.
    Egger M; Schneider M; Davey Smith G
    BMJ; 1998 Jan; 316(7125):140-4. PubMed ID: 9462324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.