These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11041757)

  • 61. Mailed questionnaires: length matters.
    Edwards P
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2004 Jun; 26(2):214; author reply 214-5. PubMed ID: 15284329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Overview of study design in clinical epidemiology.
    Stephenson JM; Babiker A
    Sex Transm Infect; 2000 Aug; 76(4):244-7. PubMed ID: 11026877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Summation of the conference.
    Doll R
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1993 Dec; 703():310-3. PubMed ID: 8192312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. In response to: Grunkemeier GL, Starr A. Alternatives to randomization in surgical studies.
    Wheatley DJ
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1993 Mar; 2(2):248. PubMed ID: 8261164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. [Grand types of studies 2: analytical studies].
    Duhaut P; Le Page L; Boutin D; Ducroix JP
    Rev Med Interne; 2006 Apr; 27(4):323-5. PubMed ID: 16380195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Epidemiology: a critical tool for infection control professionals.
    Rutala WA; Weber DJ
    Am J Infect Control; 1997 Jun; 25(3):193-4. PubMed ID: 9202813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Name of the bias and sex of the angels.
    Hernández-Díaz S
    Epidemiology; 2011 Mar; 22(2):232-3. PubMed ID: 21293207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. How to read a paper. Getting your bearings (deciding what the paper is about).
    Greenhalgh T
    BMJ; 1997 Jul; 315(7102):243-6. PubMed ID: 9253275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Observational studies as alternatives to randomized clinical trials in surgical clinical research.
    Hu X; Wright JG; McLeod RS; Lossing A; Walters BC
    Surgery; 1996 Apr; 119(4):473-5. PubMed ID: 8644015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Do small trials square with large ones?
    Flournoy N; Olkin I
    Lancet; 1995 Mar; 345(8952):741-2. PubMed ID: 7891479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Comment on "Perspective: NutriGrade: A Scoring System to Assess and Judge the Meta-Evidence of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies in Nutrition Research".
    Meerpohl JJ; Naude CE; Garner P; Mustafa RA; Schünemann HJ
    Adv Nutr; 2017 Sep; 8(5):789-790. PubMed ID: 28916579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Randomized controlled trials: a solid platform for observational research.
    Leary PJ; Swenson ER
    Eur Heart J; 2017 Apr; 38(15):1156-1158. PubMed ID: 28379468
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Concerns about run-in periods in randomized trials.
    Glynn RJ; Buring JE; Hennekens CH
    JAMA; 1998 May; 279(19):1526; author reply 1527. PubMed ID: 9605892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Complementarity of Cohort Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Eisman JA; Geusens P; van den Bergh J
    J Bone Miner Res; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1769-1770. PubMed ID: 31295364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Randomized Clinical Trials and Observational Studies: Is There a Battle?
    Chavez-MacGregor M; Giordano SH
    J Clin Oncol; 2016 Mar; 34(8):772-3. PubMed ID: 26786920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Response to are observational studies more informative than randomized controlled trials in hypertension? Pro side of the argument.
    Schillaci G; Battista F; Pucci G
    Hypertension; 2013 Sep; 62(3):469. PubMed ID: 24137633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Response to are observational studies more informative than randomized controlled trials in hypertension? Con side of the argument.
    de Simone G; Izzo R; Verdecchia P
    Hypertension; 2013 Sep; 62(3):476. PubMed ID: 24137634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Selection of the primary end point in an observational cohort study.
    Gómez G; Plana-Ripoll O; Dafni U
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2016 Oct; 70(10):950-3. PubMed ID: 27072869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Generalizability and transportability of research findings: Randomized trials vs observational studies.
    Birdal O; Tanboğa İH
    Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars; 2021 Dec; 49(8):627-629. PubMed ID: 34881701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. A reporting guideline for randomized trials and observational studies using mediation analysis: AGReMA.
    Cashin AG; McAuley JH; Lee H
    Nat Med; 2022 Mar; 28(3):432-434. PubMed ID: 35145309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.