These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11042160)

  • 41. Eukaryotic gene prediction using GeneMark.hmm-E and GeneMark-ES.
    Borodovsky M; Lomsadze A
    Curr Protoc Bioinformatics; 2011 Sep; Chapter 4():4.6.1-4.6.10. PubMed ID: 21901742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Realistic artificial DNA sequences as negative controls for computational genomics.
    Caballero J; Smit AF; Hood L; Glusman G
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2014 Jul; 42(12):e99. PubMed ID: 24803667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Computational inference of homologous gene structures in the human genome.
    Yeh RF; Lim LP; Burge CB
    Genome Res; 2001 May; 11(5):803-16. PubMed ID: 11337476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. EGASP: the human ENCODE Genome Annotation Assessment Project.
    Guigó R; Flicek P; Abril JF; Reymond A; Lagarde J; Denoeud F; Antonarakis S; Ashburner M; Bajic VB; Birney E; Castelo R; Eyras E; Ucla C; Gingeras TR; Harrow J; Hubbard T; Lewis SE; Reese MG
    Genome Biol; 2006; 7 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S2.1-31. PubMed ID: 16925836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Enhancement of accuracy and efficiency for RNA secondary structure prediction by sequence segmentation and MapReduce.
    Zhang B; Yehdego DT; Johnson KL; Leung MY; Taufer M
    BMC Struct Biol; 2013; 13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S3. PubMed ID: 24564983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Using PFP and ESG Protein Function Prediction Web Servers.
    Wei Q; McGraw J; Khan I; Kihara D
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1611():1-14. PubMed ID: 28451967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Distinctive sequence features in protein coding genic non-coding, and intergenic human DNA.
    Guigó R; Fickett JW
    J Mol Biol; 1995 Oct; 253(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 7473716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Gene identification in prokaryotic genomes, phages, metagenomes, and EST sequences with GeneMarkS suite.
    Borodovsky M; Lomsadze A
    Curr Protoc Bioinformatics; 2011 Sep; Chapter 4():4.5.1-4.5.17. PubMed ID: 21901741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. funbarRF: DNA barcode-based fungal species prediction using multiclass Random Forest supervised learning model.
    Meher PK; Sahu TK; Gahoi S; Tomar R; Rao AR
    BMC Genet; 2019 Jan; 20(1):2. PubMed ID: 30616524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Prediction of complete gene structures in human genomic DNA.
    Burge C; Karlin S
    J Mol Biol; 1997 Apr; 268(1):78-94. PubMed ID: 9149143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Improving gene-finding in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii:GreenGenie2.
    Kwan AL; Li L; Kulp DC; Dutcher SK; Stormo GD
    BMC Genomics; 2009 May; 10():210. PubMed ID: 19422688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A statistical approach for array CGH data analysis.
    Picard F; Robin S; Lavielle M; Vaisse C; Daudin JJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():27. PubMed ID: 15705208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. SpliceFinder: ab initio prediction of splice sites using convolutional neural network.
    Wang R; Wang Z; Wang J; Li S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Dec; 20(Suppl 23):652. PubMed ID: 31881982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Computational gene identification: an open problem.
    Guigó R
    Comput Chem; 1997; 21(4):215-22. PubMed ID: 9415986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A comparative analysis of soft computing techniques for gene prediction.
    Goel N; Singh S; Aseri TC
    Anal Biochem; 2013 Jul; 438(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 23529114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Gene ontology based transfer learning for protein subcellular localization.
    Mei S; Fei W; Zhou S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Feb; 12():44. PubMed ID: 21284890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Significantly lower entropy estimates for natural DNA sequences.
    Loewenstern D; Yianilos PN
    J Comput Biol; 1999; 6(1):125-42. PubMed ID: 10223669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A Monte Carlo-based framework enhances the discovery and interpretation of regulatory sequence motifs.
    Seitzer P; Wilbanks EG; Larsen DJ; Facciotti MT
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Nov; 13():317. PubMed ID: 23181585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comprehensive analysis of amino acid and nucleotide composition in eukaryotic genomes, comparing genes and pseudogenes.
    Echols N; Harrison P; Balasubramanian S; Luscombe NM; Bertone P; Zhang Z; Gerstein M
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2002 Jun; 30(11):2515-23. PubMed ID: 12034841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Individual sequences in large sets of gene sequences may be distinguished efficiently by combinations of shared sub-sequences.
    Gibbs MJ; Armstrong JS; Gibbs AJ
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():90. PubMed ID: 15817134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.