These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11042244)

  • 1. Quality improvement studies: the need is there but so are the challenges.
    Krumholz HM; Herrin J
    Am J Med; 2000 Oct; 109(6):501-3. PubMed ID: 11042244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Strengthening the contribution of quality improvement research to evidence based health care.
    Baker GR
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2006 Jun; 15(3):150-1. PubMed ID: 16751459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Proposed standards for quality improvement research and publication: one step forward and two steps back.
    Pronovost P; Wachter R
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2006 Jun; 15(3):152-3. PubMed ID: 16751460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Critical appraisal tools facilitate the work of the quality professional.
    Byers JF; Beaudin CL
    J Healthc Qual; 2001; 23(5):35-8, 40-3. PubMed ID: 11565170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does paying for performance improve the quality of health care?
    Chassin MR
    Med Care Res Rev; 2006 Feb; 63(1 Suppl):122S-125S. PubMed ID: 16688928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Seven reasons why you should not categorize continuous data.
    Dinero TE
    J Health Soc Policy; 1996; 8(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 10162905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Obtaining power or obtaining precision. Delineating methods of sample-size planning.
    Kelley K; Maxwell SE; Rausch JR
    Eval Health Prof; 2003 Sep; 26(3):258-87. PubMed ID: 12971200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rethinking randomized clinical trials for comparative effectiveness research: the need for transformational change.
    Luce BR; Kramer JM; Goodman SN; Connor JT; Tunis S; Whicher D; Schwartz JS
    Ann Intern Med; 2009 Aug; 151(3):206-9. PubMed ID: 19567619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of action research.
    Karim K
    Nurs Stand; 2001 Mar 14-20; 15(26):33-5. PubMed ID: 12216236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Design of cluster-randomized trials of quality improvement interventions aimed at medical care providers.
    Glynn RJ; Brookhart MA; Stedman M; Avorn J; Solomon DH
    Med Care; 2007 Oct; 45(10 Supl 2):S38-43. PubMed ID: 17909381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determinants of the intracluster correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials: the case of implementation research.
    Campbell MK; Fayers PM; Grimshaw JM
    Clin Trials; 2005; 2(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 16279131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The logged dependent variable, heteroscedasticity, and the retransformation problem.
    Manning WG
    J Health Econ; 1998 Jun; 17(3):283-95. PubMed ID: 10180919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. More appropriate evaluation methods for community-level health interventions. Introduction to the special issue.
    McKinlay JB
    Eval Rev; 1996 Jun; 20(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 10182203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sample size considerations in observational health care quality studies.
    Normand SL; Zou KH
    Stat Med; 2002 Feb; 21(3):331-45. PubMed ID: 11813221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Increasing value: a research agenda for addressing the managerial and organizational challenges facing health care delivery in the United States.
    Shortell SM
    Med Care Res Rev; 2004 Sep; 61(3 Suppl):12S-30S. PubMed ID: 15375281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reading qualitative research from a methodological point of view.
    Cuevas NM; Dinero TE; Feit MD
    J Health Soc Policy; 1996; 8(1):73-90. PubMed ID: 10162906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Taking the quality challenge: highlights from the AHRQ summit.
    Qual Lett Healthc Lead; 2005 May; 17(5):6-10, 1. PubMed ID: 16045103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validity and reliability issues in published public health and social policy research.
    Lewis DM; Cuevas NM
    J Health Soc Policy; 1996; 8(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 10162902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Developing and refining interventions in persons with health disparities: the use of qualitative description.
    Sullivan-Bolyai S; Bova C; Harper D
    Nurs Outlook; 2005; 53(3):127-33. PubMed ID: 15988449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ethical dilemmas in participatory action research: a case study from the disability community.
    Minkler M; Fadem P; Perry M; Blum K; Moore L; Rogers J
    Health Educ Behav; 2002 Feb; 29(1):14-29. PubMed ID: 11822550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.