These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11042940)

  • 1. Alaska's obstetrical delivery systems: a descriptive epidemiologic study.
    Smith DW; Murphy NJ
    Alaska Med; 2000; 42(3):78-84. PubMed ID: 11042940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do all hospitals need cesarean delivery capability? An outcomes study of maternity care in a rural hospital without on-site cesarean capability.
    Leeman L; Leeman R
    J Fam Pract; 2002 Feb; 51(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 11978210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does a Cesarean section delivery always cost more than a vaginal delivery?
    Kazandjian VA; Chaulk CP; Ogunbo S; Wicker K
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Feb; 13(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 17286718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Key issues and barriers to obstetrical anesthesia care in Ontario community hospitals with fewer than 2,000 deliveries annually.
    Angle P; Kurtz Landy C; Murthy Y; Cino P
    Can J Anaesth; 2009 Sep; 56(9):667-77. PubMed ID: 19533265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vaginal twin delivery: a survey and review of location, anesthesia coverage and interventions.
    Carvalho B; Saxena A; Butwick A; Macario A
    Int J Obstet Anesth; 2008 Jul; 17(3):212-6. PubMed ID: 17881218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experience with an alternative birth center in a university hospital.
    Laube DW
    J Reprod Med; 1983 Jun; 28(6):391-6. PubMed ID: 6887145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: wise use of finite resources? A view from the trenches.
    Druzin ML; El-Sayed YY
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):305-8. PubMed ID: 17011403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fear of failure: are we doing too many trials of instrumental delivery in theatre?
    Ebulue V; Vadalkar J; Cely S; Dopwell F; Yoong W
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(11):1234-8. PubMed ID: 19016358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neonatal mortality for primary cesarean and vaginal births to low-risk women: application of an "intention-to-treat" model.
    MacDorman MF; Declercq E; Menacker F; Malloy MH
    Birth; 2008 Mar; 35(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 18307481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Delivery methods for infants weighing less than 2500 grams. Anesthesia methods in cesarean cases and vaginal deliveries].
    Hamza J
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1998 Dec; 27(2 Suppl):275-84. PubMed ID: 10049013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cesarean delivery in Native American women: are low rates explained by practices common to the Indian health service?
    Mahoney SF; Malcoe LH
    Birth; 2005 Sep; 32(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 16128970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality obstetric trauma indicators valid measures of hospital safety?
    Grobman WA; Feinglass J; Murthy S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 195(3):868-74. PubMed ID: 16949428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
    Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Term-breech presentation: predictive factors of cesarean section for vaginal-birth failure].
    Broche DE; Ramanah R; Collin A; Mangin M; Vidal C; Maillet R; Riethmuller D
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Sep; 37(5):483-92. PubMed ID: 18584974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [A day in the busy obstetric unit from the anesthesiologist point of view, experience at the Cleveland clinic; Cleveland, Ohio].
    Ootaki C; Barsoum S
    Masui; 2009 Oct; 58(10):1328-35. PubMed ID: 19860246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cohort study of operative delivery in the second stage of labour and standard of obstetric care.
    Murphy DJ; Liebling RE; Patel R; Verity L; Swingler R
    BJOG; 2003 Jun; 110(6):610-5. PubMed ID: 12798481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prenatal risk factors for Caesarean section. Analyses of the ALSPAC cohort of 12,944 women in England.
    Patel RR; Peters TJ; Murphy DJ;
    Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 34(2):353-67. PubMed ID: 15659468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Occupation and risk of cesarean section: study based on the perinatal survey of Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
    Simoes E; Kunz S; Bosing-Schwenkglenks M; Schmahl FW
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2005 Apr; 271(4):338-42. PubMed ID: 15083307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Caesarean section in developing countries.
    Kwawukume EY
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2001 Feb; 15(1):165-78. PubMed ID: 11359321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nighttime call in house vs. out of house: a comparison of obstetric procedure rates.
    Goldberg J; Gopal M; Singhal R; Mitchell C; Culhane J; Webb DA
    J Reprod Med; 2004 Mar; 49(3):143-7. PubMed ID: 15098882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.