These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11042948)
1. [Influence of diagnostic tests for estimating prevalence during surveillance programs]. Fuchs K; Deutz A; Köfer J; Wagner P Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2000 Sep; 113(9):348-51. PubMed ID: 11042948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On the surveillance for animal diseases in small herds. Greiner M; Dekker A Prev Vet Med; 2005 Sep; 70(3-4):223-34. PubMed ID: 15894392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A stochastic simulation model to determine the sample size of repeated national surveys to document freedom from bovine herpesvirus 1 (BoHV-1) infection. Knopf L; Schwermer H; Stärk KD BMC Vet Res; 2007 May; 3():10. PubMed ID: 17511856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Poisson sampling: a sampling strategy for concurrently establishing freedom from disease and estimating population characteristics. Williams MS; Ebel ED; Wells SJ Prev Vet Med; 2009 May; 89(1-2):34-42. PubMed ID: 19217677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic test accuracy and prevalence inferences based on joint and sequential testing with finite population sampling. Su CL; Gardner IA; Johnson WO Stat Med; 2004 Jul; 23(14):2237-55. PubMed ID: 15236428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Population inferences from targeted sampling with uncertain epidemiologic information. Williams MS; Ebel ED; Wells SJ Prev Vet Med; 2009 May; 89(1-2):25-33. PubMed ID: 19200614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A general approach to sample size determination for prevalence surveys that use dual test protocols. Cheng D; Stamey JD; Branscum AJ Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(5):694-706. PubMed ID: 17722203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bayesian sample size determination for prevalence and diagnostic test studies in the absence of a gold standard test. Dendukuri N; Rahme E; Bélisle P; Joseph L Biometrics; 2004 Jun; 60(2):388-97. PubMed ID: 15180664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimation of sample sizes for pooled faecal sampling for detection of Salmonella in pigs. Arnold ME; Cook AJ Epidemiol Infect; 2009 Dec; 137(12):1734-41. PubMed ID: 19416556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of epidemiologic information in targeted surveillance for population inference. Wells SJ; Ebel ED; Williams MS; Scott AE; Wagner BA; Marshall KL Prev Vet Med; 2009 May; 89(1-2):43-50. PubMed ID: 19269705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bayesian sample size for diagnostic test studies in the absence of a gold standard: Comparing identifiable with non-identifiable models. Dendukuri N; Bélisle P; Joseph L Stat Med; 2010 Nov; 29(26):2688-97. PubMed ID: 20803558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using and interpreting diagnostic tests. McKenna SL; Dohoo IR Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract; 2006 Mar; 22(1):195-205. PubMed ID: 16517302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic tests, sensitivity, specificity, efficiency and prevalence. Trajstman AC Aust Vet J; 1979 Jun; 55(6):289. PubMed ID: 518423 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A review of prevalences of paratuberculosis in farmed animals in Europe. Nielsen SS; Toft N Prev Vet Med; 2009 Jan; 88(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 18817995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prevalence of Michigan dairy herds infected with Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis as determined by environmental sampling. Pillars RB; Grooms DL; Woltanski JA; Blair E Prev Vet Med; 2009 Jun; 89(3-4):191-6. PubMed ID: 19359059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sample size determination for estimation of the accuracy of two conditionally independent tests in the absence of a gold standard. Georgiadis MP; Johnson WO; Gardner IA Prev Vet Med; 2005 Sep; 71(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 16076507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sample size calculations for surveys to substantiate freedom of populations from infectious agents. Johnson WO; Su CL; Gardner IA; Christensen R Biometrics; 2004 Mar; 60(1):165-71. PubMed ID: 15032786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Defining output-based standards to achieve and maintain tuberculosis freedom in farmed deer, with reference to member states of the European Union. More SJ; Cameron AR; Greiner M; Clifton-Hadley RS; Rodeia SC; Bakker D; Salman MD; Sharp JM; De Massis F; Aranaz A; Boniotti MB; Gaffuri A; Have P; Verloo D; Woodford M; Wierup M Prev Vet Med; 2009 Aug; 90(3-4):254-67. PubMed ID: 19464742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimization of household survey sampling without sample frames. Bostoen K; Chalabi Z Int J Epidemiol; 2006 Jun; 35(3):751-5. PubMed ID: 16481364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Strategies for two-stage sampling designs for estimating herd-level prevalence. Wagner B; Salman MD Prev Vet Med; 2004 Dec; 66(1-4):1-17. PubMed ID: 15579331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]