192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11044039)
1. Case-based reasoning computer algorithm that uses mammographic findings for breast biopsy decisions.
Floyd CE; Lo JY; Tourassi GD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Nov; 175(5):1347-52. PubMed ID: 11044039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The prediction of breast cancer biopsy outcomes using two CAD approaches that both emphasize an intelligible decision process.
Elter M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Wittenberg T
Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4164-72. PubMed ID: 18072480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and evaluation of a case-based reasoning classifier for prediction of breast biopsy outcome with BI-RADS lexicon.
Bilska-Wolak AO; Floyd CE
Med Phys; 2002 Sep; 29(9):2090-100. PubMed ID: 12349930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of breast cancer malignancy using an artificial neural network.
Floyd CE; Lo JY; Yun AJ; Sullivan DC; Kornguth PJ
Cancer; 1994 Dec; 74(11):2944-8. PubMed ID: 7954258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bayesian network to predict breast cancer risk of mammographic microcalcifications and reduce number of benign biopsy results: initial experience.
Burnside ES; Rubin DL; Fine JP; Shachter RD; Sisney GA; Leung WK
Radiology; 2006 Sep; 240(3):666-73. PubMed ID: 16926323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of likelihood ratio to classification of mammographic masses; performance comparison to case-based reasoning.
Bilska-Wolak AO; Floyd CE; Nolte LW; Lo JY
Med Phys; 2003 May; 30(5):949-58. PubMed ID: 12773004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer aid for decision to biopsy breast masses on mammography: validation on new cases.
Bilska-Wolak AO; Floyd CE; Lo JY; Baker JA
Acad Radiol; 2005 Jun; 12(6):671-80. PubMed ID: 15935965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computer-aided preoperative diagnosis of microcalcifications on mammograms.
Kouskos E; Markopoulos C; Revenas K; Koufopoulos K; Kyriakou V; Gogas J
Acta Radiol; 2003 Jan; 44(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 12630997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Artificial neural networks in mammography: application to decision making in the diagnosis of breast cancer.
Wu Y; Giger ML; Doi K; Vyborny CJ; Schmidt RA; Metz CE
Radiology; 1993 Apr; 187(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 8451441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predicting breast cancer invasion with artificial neural networks on the basis of mammographic features.
Lo JY; Baker JA; Kornguth PJ; Iglehart JD; Floyd CE
Radiology; 1997 Apr; 203(1):159-63. PubMed ID: 9122385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computerized classification of malignant and benign microcalcifications on mammograms: texture analysis using an artificial neural network.
Chan HP; Sahiner B; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Lam KL; Adler DD; Goodsitt MM
Phys Med Biol; 1997 Mar; 42(3):549-67. PubMed ID: 9080535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast cancer: prediction with artificial neural network based on BI-RADS standardized lexicon.
Baker JA; Kornguth PJ; Lo JY; Williford ME; Floyd CE
Radiology; 1995 Sep; 196(3):817-22. PubMed ID: 7644649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differences between computer-aided diagnosis of breast masses and that of calcifications.
Markey MK; Lo JY; Floyd CE
Radiology; 2002 May; 223(2):489-93. PubMed ID: 11997558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preliminary investigation of a Bayesian network for mammographic diagnosis of breast cancer.
Kahn CE; Roberts LM; Wang K; Jenks D; Haddawy P
Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care; 1995; ():208-12. PubMed ID: 8563269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Limitations in distinguishing malignant from benign lesions of the breast by systematic review of mammograms.
Monostori Z; Herman PG; Carmody DP; Eacobacci TM; Capece NR; Cruz VM; Gentin S; Vernace FM
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1991 Dec; 173(6):438-42. PubMed ID: 1948599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of artificial neural networks (computer analysis) in the diagnosis of microcalcifications on mammography.
Markopoulos C; Kouskos E; Koufopoulos K; Kyriakou V; Gogas J
Eur J Radiol; 2001 Jul; 39(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 11439232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Malignant and benign clustered microcalcifications: automated feature analysis and classification.
Jiang Y; Nishikawa RM; Wolverton DE; Metz CE; Giger ML; Schmidt RA; Vyborny CJ; Doi K
Radiology; 1996 Mar; 198(3):671-8. PubMed ID: 8628853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast mass lesions: computer-aided diagnosis models with mammographic and sonographic descriptors.
Jesneck JL; Lo JY; Baker JA
Radiology; 2007 Aug; 244(2):390-8. PubMed ID: 17562812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance goals for an adjunct diagnostic test to reduce unnecessary biopsies after screening mammography: analysis of costs, benefits, and consequences.
Lee CI; Bensink ME; Berry K; Musa Z; Bodnar C; Dann R; Jarvik JG; Lehman CD; Ramsey SD
J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Dec; 10(12):924-30. PubMed ID: 24295942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative characterization of mass lesions on digitized mammograms for computer-assisted diagnosis.
Leichter I; Buchbinder S; Bamberger P; Novak B; Fields S; Lederman R
Invest Radiol; 2000 Jun; 35(6):366-72. PubMed ID: 10853611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
