134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11044424)
1. Electromagnetic versus fluoroscopic mapping of the inferior isthmus for ablation of typical atrial flutter: A prospective randomized study.
Kottkamp H; Hügl B; Krauss B; Wetzel U; Fleck A; Schuler G; Hindricks G
Circulation; 2000 Oct; 102(17):2082-6. PubMed ID: 11044424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of electroanatomically guided versus conventional catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter on the fluoroscopy time and resource use: a prospective randomized multicenter study.
Hindricks G; Willems S; Kautzner J; De Chillou C; Wiedemann M; Schepel S; Piorkowski C; Risius T; Kottkamp H;
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2009 Jul; 20(7):734-40. PubMed ID: 19298568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Usefulness of three-dimensional non-fluoroscopic mapping in the ablation of typical atrial flutter.
Leonelli FM; Tomassoni G; Richey M; Natale A
Ital Heart J; 2002 Jun; 3(6):360-5. PubMed ID: 12116800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ablation of typical atrial flutter using a non-fluoroscopic catheter tracking system vs. conventional fluoroscopy--results from a prospective randomized study.
Schoene K; Rolf S; Schloma D; John S; Arya A; Dinov B; Richter S; Bollmann A; Hindricks G; Sommer P
Europace; 2015 Jul; 17(7):1117-21. PubMed ID: 25736724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Atrial flutter ablation using a technique for detection of conduction block within the posterior isthmus.
Willems S; Weiss C; Hoffmann M; Meinertz T
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 May; 22(5):750-8. PubMed ID: 10353134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is it possible to create a linear lesion with no local electrograms? Comparison between a three-dimensional mapping system and conventional fluoroscopy for cavotricuspid isthmus ablation of typical atrial flutter.
Muto C; Canciello M; Carreras G; Ottaviano L; Ascione L; Angelini S; Tuccillo B
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2007 Jun; 8(6):414-8. PubMed ID: 17502757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. LocaLisa catheter navigation reduces fluoroscopy time and dosage in ablation of atrial flutter: a prospective randomized study.
Schneider MA; Ndrepepa G; Dobran I; Schreieck J; Weber S; Plewan A; Deisenhofer I; Karch MR; Schömig A; Schmitt C
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2003 Jun; 14(6):587-90. PubMed ID: 12875418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of a new non-fluoroscopic three-dimensional mapping system in type I atrial flutter ablation.
Verbeet T; Castro J; Morissens M; Ngoc ET; Decoodt P
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2005 Jan; 28 Suppl 1():S99-101. PubMed ID: 15683538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is 8-mm more effective than 4-mm tip electrode catheter for ablation of typical atrial flutter?
Tsai CF; Tai CT; Yu WC; Chen YJ; Hsieh MH; Chiang CE; Ding YA; Chang MS; Chen SA
Circulation; 1999 Aug; 100(7):768-71. PubMed ID: 10449701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Atrial flutter ablation with a new radiofrequency catheter.
Santos JF; Parreira L; Madeira J; Fonseca N; Buque R; Soares L; Inês L
Rev Port Cardiol; 2001; 20(7-8):729-44. PubMed ID: 11582624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Randomized comparison of two targets in typical atrial flutter ablation.
Anselme F; Klug D; Scanu P; Poty H; Lacroix D; Kacet S; Cribier A; Saoudi N
Am J Cardiol; 2000 Jun; 85(11):1302-7. PubMed ID: 10831944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characterization of a stepwise approach in cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for typical atrial flutter: A randomized study comparing three catheters.
Rubín JM; Calvo D; Pérez D; Fidalgo A; de la Hera JM; Martínez L; Capín E; Arrizabalaga H; Carballeira L; García D; Morís C
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2017 Oct; 40(10):1052-1058. PubMed ID: 28846143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective randomized comparison of cooled radiofrequency versus standard radiofrequency energy for ablation of typical atrial flutter.
Atiga WL; Worley SJ; Hummel J; Berger RD; Gohn DC; Mandalakas NJ; Kalbfleisch S; Halperin H; Donahue K; Tomaselli G; Calkins H; Daoud E
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2002 Aug; 25(8):1172-8. PubMed ID: 12358166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Catheter ablation of atrial flutter.
Kottkamp H; Hindricks G
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1999 Aug; 47 Suppl 3():357-61. PubMed ID: 10520768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Catheter ablation of atrial flutter guided by electroanatomic mapping (CARTO): a randomized comparison to the conventional approach.
Willems S; Weiss C; Ventura R; Rüppel R; Risius T; Hoffmann M; Meinertz T
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2000 Nov; 11(11):1223-30. PubMed ID: 11083243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Catheter ablation of common-type atrial flutter guided by three-dimensional right atrial geometry reconstruction and catheter tracking using cutaneous patches: a randomized prospective study.
Ventura R; Rostock T; Klemm HU; Lutomsky B; Demir C; Weiss C; Meinertz T; Willems S
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2004 Oct; 15(10):1157-61. PubMed ID: 15485440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acute and long-term efficacy and safety of catheter cryoablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus for treatment of type 1 atrial flutter.
Feld GK; Daubert JP; Weiss R; Miles WM; Pelkey W;
Heart Rhythm; 2008 Jul; 5(7):1009-14. PubMed ID: 18598956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The non-fluoroscopic navigation reduces significantly not only the fluoroscopic exposure during catheter ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus but the total radiofrequency time as well.
Shalganov T; Stoyanov M; Kunev B
Acta Cardiol; 2017 Apr; 72(2):167-171. PubMed ID: 28597788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomized comparison of anatomical versus voltage guided ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus for atrial flutter.
Hall B; Veerareddy S; Cheung P; Good E; Lemola K; Han J; Kamala T; Chugh A; Pelosi F; Morady F; Oral H
Heart Rhythm; 2004 May; 1(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 15851115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of common-type atrial flutter guided by conventional versus electroanatomical mapping.
Weiss C; Willems S; Meinertz T
Bratisl Lek Listy; 2001; 102(9):385-9. PubMed ID: 11763673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
