207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11044536)
1. Induction of labor by prostaglandin E(2) in relation to the Bishop score.
Kemp B; Winkler M; Rath W
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2000 Oct; 71(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 11044536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for ripening of unfavorable cervix and labor induction.
Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Pokpirom J
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 1997 Aug; 23(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 9311179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized trial comparing vaginal and cervical prostaglandin gel for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Irion O; Pedrazzoli J; Mermillod B
Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jan; 91(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 9464723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter used alone or combined with a single dose of dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study.
Chowdhary A; Bagga R; Jasvinder Kalra ; Jain V; Saha SC; Kumar P
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 May; 39(4):461-467. PubMed ID: 30747025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervical ripening and induction of labor by prostaglandin E2: a comparison between intracervical gel and vaginal pessary.
D'Aniello G; Bocchi C; Florio P; Ignacchiti E; Guidoni CG; Centini G; Cito G; Picciolini E; Severi FM; Petraglia F
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2003 Sep; 14(3):158-62. PubMed ID: 14694970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Local administration of prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening and labor induction: the appropriate route and dose.
Nuutila M; Kajanoja P
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1996 Feb; 75(2):135-8. PubMed ID: 8604599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
Chang CH; Chang FM
J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomized controlled trial of 24-hour vaginal dinoprostone pessary compared to gel for induction of labor in term pregnancies with a Bishop score < or = 4.
Triglia MT; Palamara F; Lojacono A; Prefumo F; Frusca T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 May; 89(5):651-7. PubMed ID: 20199360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of extraamniotic Foley catheter and intracervical prostaglandin E gel for preinduction cervical ripening.
Dalui R; Suri V; Ray P; Gupta I
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Apr; 84(4):362-7. PubMed ID: 15762966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Elective cervical ripening in women beyond the 290th day of pregnancy: a randomized trial comparing 2 dinoprostone preparations.
Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Fazzio M; Volpe A
J Reprod Med; 2007 Oct; 52(10):945-9. PubMed ID: 17977171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Neiger R; Greaves PC
Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pre-induction cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 gel: intracervical versus intravaginal route.
Zanini A; Ghidini A; Norchi S; Beretta E; Cortinovis I; Bottino S
Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Oct; 76(4):681-3. PubMed ID: 2216204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized prospective comparison of the efficacy and safety of intravaginal and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel.
Stempel JE; Prins RP; Dean S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 176(6):1305-9; discussion 1309-12. PubMed ID: 9215189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening: a randomized comparison of Cervidil versus Prepidil.
Chyu JK; Strassner HT
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 177(3):606-11. PubMed ID: 9322631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Pharmacological induction of labour: benefits and risks].
Romanelli M; Ribiani E; Burnelli L; Luzi G; Affronti G; Di Renzo GC
Minerva Ginecol; 2007 Aug; 59(4):347-55. PubMed ID: 17923826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Double-balloon catheter compared to vaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening in obese women at term].
Grange J; Dimet J; Vital M; Le Thuaut A; Ducarme G
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2017 Oct; 45(10):521-527. PubMed ID: 28757105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Study of the effect of Propess for ripening of the unfavorable cervix for the induction of labor due to medical indications].
Nikolov A; Dimitrov A; Krŭsteva K; Nashar S
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2003; 42(3):5-8. PubMed ID: 12858482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pre-induction cervical ripening: comparing between two vaginal preparations of dinoprostone in women with an unfavorable cervix.
Ashwal E; Hiersch L; Melamed N; Manor Y; Wiznitzer A; Hod M; Yogev Y
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Dec; 27(18):1874-9. PubMed ID: 24417462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy of different doses of intravaginal misoprostol with intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Saxena P; Puri M; Bajaj M; Mishra A; Trivedi SS
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2011 Jul; 15(7):759-63. PubMed ID: 21780543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Double-blind comparison of intracervical and intravaginal prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening and induction of labor.
Hales KA; Rayburn WF; Turnbull GL; Christensen HD; Patatanian E
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 171(4):1087-91. PubMed ID: 7943076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
