207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11044536)
21. Cervical ripening and induction of delivery by local administration of prostaglandin E2 gel or vaginal tablets is equally effective.
Rix P; Ladehoff P; Møller AM; Tilma KA; Zdravkovic M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1996 Jan; 75(1):45-7. PubMed ID: 8560996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Dinoprostone: slow release vaginal insert (Propess) and intracervical gel (Prepidil) for the induction of labour with unriped cervix].
Grignaffini A; Soncini E; Anfuso S; Ronzoni E
Minerva Ginecol; 2004 Oct; 56(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 15531859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prospective randomised controlled trial to compare safety and efficacy of intravaginal Misoprostol with intracervical Cerviprime for induction of labour with unfavourable cervix.
Krithika KS; Aggarwal N; Suri V
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Apr; 28(3):294-7. PubMed ID: 18569471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Uterine hyperstimulation following cervix ripening with dinoprostone in a vaginal insert system].
Brouwers JM; Briët JW; Brouwers JR
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2004 Jun; 148(26):1300-3. PubMed ID: 15279216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of intracervical and intravaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and labour induction in patients with an unfavourable cervix.
Srisomboon J; Piyamongkol W; Aiewsakul P
J Med Assoc Thai; 1997 Mar; 80(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 9175387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
Meyer M; Pflum J; Howard D
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Cervical maturation and induction of labor with PgE2 gel. Authors' experience].
Carta G; Vigilante M; Di Cesare S; Mascaretti G; Caserta D; Moscarini M
Minerva Ginecol; 1997 Oct; 49(10):427-32. PubMed ID: 9463175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Randomized, double-blind trial of prostaglandin E2 intravaginal gel versus low-dose oxytocin for cervical ripening before induction of labor.
Pollnow DM; Broekhuizen FF
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jun; 174(6):1910-3; discussion 1913-6. PubMed ID: 8678158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Uterine hyperstimulation following cervix ripening with dinoprostone in a vaginal insert system].
Veerman HM
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Jan; 149(2):105-6; author reply 106. PubMed ID: 15688844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of the Cook vaginal cervical ripening balloon with prostaglandin E2 insert for induction of labor in late pregnancy.
Wang L; Wang G; Cao W; Guo L; Hu H; Li Y; Zhang Q
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Sep; 302(3):579-584. PubMed ID: 32617665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A prospective, randomized comparison of Foley catheter insertion versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening.
Sciscione AC; McCullough H; Manley JS; Shlossman PA; Pollock M; Colmorgen GH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jan; 180(1 Pt 1):55-60. PubMed ID: 9914578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Sweeping of membranes vs. intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for cervical ripening. Randomized trial.
Gemer O; Kapustian V; Harari D; Sassoon E; Segal S
J Reprod Med; 2001 Aug; 46(8):706-8. PubMed ID: 11547642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A randomized trial of extra-amniotic saline infusion plus intracervical Foley catheter balloon versus prostaglandin E2 vaginal gel for ripening the cervix and inducing labor in patients with unfavorable cervices.
Rouben D; Arias F
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Aug; 82(2):290-4. PubMed ID: 8336880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Randomized study of pre-induction cervical ripening with sequential use of intravaginal prostaglandin E2 gel.
Carlan SJ; Danna P; Durkee D; Quinsey C; Lanaris B
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Apr; 85(4):608-13. PubMed ID: 7898842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Wing DA; Ortiz-Omphroy G; Paul RH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 177(3):612-8. PubMed ID: 9322632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Vaginal Dinoprostone Versus Intravenous Oxytocin for Labor Induction in Patients Not Responsive to a First Dose of Dinoprostone: A Randomized Prospective Study.
Antonazzo P; Laoreti A; Personeni C; Grossi E; Martinelli A; Cetin I
Reprod Sci; 2016 Jun; 23(6):779-84. PubMed ID: 26626794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of vaginal pH on efficacy of the dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening/labor induction.
Ramsey PS; Ogburn PL; Harris DY; Heise RH; Ramin KD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Oct; 187(4):843-6. PubMed ID: 12388961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Randomized study on removable PGE2 vaginal insert versus PGE2 cervical gel for cervical priming and labor induction in low-Bishop-score pregnancy.
Strobelt N; Meregalli V; Ratti M; Mariani S; Zani G; Morana S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(3):302-5. PubMed ID: 16553177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Intravaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone as cervical ripening and labor-inducing agents.
Fletcher H; Mitchell S; Frederick J; Simeon D; Brown D
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Feb; 83(2):244-7. PubMed ID: 8290188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
