These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11044536)

  • 41. [Induced labor with prostaglandins: 0.5 mg PGE2 intracervical gel versus 3 mg PGE2 vaginal tablet].
    Müller T; Rempen A
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 1995; 199(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 7725767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Cervical maturation by repeated applications of prostaglandin E2 gel. 186 cases].
    Panel P; Bascou V; de Meeus JB; Magnin G
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(4):386-94. PubMed ID: 9265064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Intravaginal glyceryl trinitrate and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labor.
    Nunes FP; Campos AP; Pedroso SR; Leite CF; Avillez TP; Rodrigues RD; Meirinho M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 194(4):1022-6. PubMed ID: 16580291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labor.
    Nunes F; Rodrigues R; Meirinho M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Sep; 181(3):626-9. PubMed ID: 10486474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Induction of labor in prolonged pregnancy with unfavorable cervix: comparison of sequential intracervical Foley catheter-intravaginal misoprostol and intravaginal misoprostol alone.
    Ande AB; Ezeanochie CM; Olagbuji NB
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Apr; 285(4):967-71. PubMed ID: 22012248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel (Prepidil gel): randomized comparison.
    Chuck FJ; Huffaker BJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Oct; 173(4):1137-42. PubMed ID: 7485307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparison of two preparations of dinoprostone for pre-induction of labour in nulliparous women with very unfavourable cervical condition: a randomised clinical trial.
    Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Verocchi G; Volpe A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Apr; 119(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 15808378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Ripening of the unfavorable cervix with prostaglandin E2: intracervical versus intravaginal route.
    Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1993 Jan; 76 Suppl 1():63-8. PubMed ID: 8113660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Dinoprostone compared with misoprostol for cervical ripening for induction of labor at term.
    Church S; Van Meter A; Whitfield R
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2009; 54(5):405-411. PubMed ID: 19720343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparative efficacy and cost of the prostaglandin analogs dinoprostone and misoprostol as labor preinduction agents.
    Ramsey PS; Harris DY; Ogburn PL; Heise RH; Magtibay PM; Ramin KD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Feb; 188(2):560-5. PubMed ID: 12592272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A randomized comparison of extra-amniotic saline infusion and intracervical dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening.
    Goldman JB; Wigton TR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Feb; 93(2):271-4. PubMed ID: 9932568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparison of Bishop's score and cervical length in determining the need for cervical maturation before labor induction.
    Demir H; Köle E; Çakır Köle M; Güllüoğlu A; Danışman AN
    Ginekol Pol; 2024; 95(5):373-383. PubMed ID: 37934896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Misoprostol: an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA; Rahall A; Jones MM; Goodwin TM; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1811-6. PubMed ID: 7778637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The use of prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening in patients requiring induction of labour.
    Caruso A; De Santis L; Carducci B; Ferrazzani S; De Carolis S; Mancuso S
    J Int Med Res; 1997; 25(3):159-66. PubMed ID: 9178148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Induction of labor in patients with an unfavorable cervix after a cesarean using an osmotic dilator versus vaginal prostaglandin.
    Maier JT; Metz M; Watermann N; Li L; Schalinski E; Gauger U; Rath W; Hellmeyer L
    J Perinat Med; 2018 Apr; 46(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 28672756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluation of glyceryl trinitrate, misoprostol, and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening in term pregnancy.
    Sharma Y; Kumar S; Mittal S; Misra R; Dadhwal V
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2005 Jun; 31(3):210-5. PubMed ID: 15916656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Cervical ripening and labor induction with prostaglandin E2 gel: a placebo-controlled study.
    Bernstein P; Leyland N; Gurland P; Gare D
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Feb; 156(2):336-40. PubMed ID: 3548368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Prostaglandin E2 cervical ripening without subsequent induction of labor.
    McKenna DS; Costa SW; Samuels P
    Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jul; 94(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 10389710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Double-blind comparison of 2.5 and 5.0 mg of prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening.
    Smith CV; Miller A; Livezey GT
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):745-8. PubMed ID: 8913976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Induction of labor with a new intracervically administered prostaglandin E2 gel. Report of initial experience].
    Ammann M; Schneider H; Gyr T; Dürig P; Hänggi W; Huber B
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1992 Oct; 52(10):602-5. PubMed ID: 1294435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.