148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11044854)
1. Irritation test of tissue adhesives for facial prostheses.
Dahl JE; Polyzois GL
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Oct; 84(4):453-7. PubMed ID: 11044854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Potential of dental adhesives to induce mucosal irritation evaluated by the HET-CAM method.
Dahl JE
Acta Odontol Scand; 2007 Oct; 65(5):275-83. PubMed ID: 17851830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hen egg chorioallantoic membrane bioassay: an in vitro alternative to draize eye irritation test for pesticide screening.
Kishore AS; Surekha PA; Sekhar PV; Srinivas A; Murthy PB
Int J Toxicol; 2008 Nov; 27(6):449-53. PubMed ID: 19482824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Irritative effects of some pesticides and a technical component on tissue structure of the chorioallantoic membrane.
Budai P; Várnagy L; Fejes S; Somlyay IM; Linczmayer K; Pongrácz A
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2004; 69(4):807-9. PubMed ID: 15756873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of a sensitive test method to evaluate mechanical irritation potential on mucosal skin.
Farage MA; Meyer S; Walter D
Skin Res Technol; 2004 May; 10(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 15059175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Eye irritation of low-irritant cosmetic formulations: correlation of in vitro results with clinical data and product composition.
Debbasch C; Ebenhahn C; Dami N; Pericoi M; Van den Berghe C; Cottin M; Nohynek GJ
Food Chem Toxicol; 2005 Jan; 43(1):155-65. PubMed ID: 15582208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Evaluation of the chorioallantoic membrane in the chick embryo to test the irritation potential of chemical and cosmetic products].
Mystkowska-Baczkowska ET; Komar A; Samos-Zielińska J; Stroińska W; Rogulska T
Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 1995; 46(4):407-15. PubMed ID: 8619123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Study on using the hen's egg test-chorioallantoic membrane as an alternative method of draize eye irritation test].
Liao Y; Wang X; Zhang L; Li G
Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2004 May; 33(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 15211792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Tissue toxicity of local anesthetics. An in vivo trial].
Lüring C; Kalteis T; Wild K; Perlick L; Grifka J
Schmerz; 2003 Jun; 17(3):185-90. PubMed ID: 12789485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A modified HET-CAM assay approach to the assessment of anti-irritant properties of plant extracts.
Wilson TD; Steck WF
Food Chem Toxicol; 2000 Oct; 38(10):867-72. PubMed ID: 11039320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An alternative test battery in detecting ocular irritancy of agrochemicals.
Tavaszi J; Budai P; Pálovics A; Kismányoki A
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):891-5. PubMed ID: 19226840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Tissue toxicity of antiseptics].
Kalteis T; Lüring C; Schaumburger J; Perlick L; Bäthis H; Grifka J
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(2):233-8. PubMed ID: 12695963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Irritation of dental adhesive agents evaluated by the HET-CAM test.
Dahl JE
Toxicol In Vitro; 1999 Apr; 13(2):259-64. PubMed ID: 20654483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the hen's egg test-chorioallantonic membrane (CAM) method in prediction of the eye irritation potential formulated personal wash products.
Yan X; Piterski C; Nitka S
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2007; 26(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 17464746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of modifications of the traditional patch test in assessing the chemical irritation potential of feminine hygiene products.
Farage MA; Meyer S; Walter D
Skin Res Technol; 2004 May; 10(2):73-84. PubMed ID: 15059174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vivo and in vitro irritation testing of low concentrations of hydrofluoric acid.
Hjortsjö C; Saxegaard E; Young A; Dahl JE
Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(6):360-5. PubMed ID: 19593680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Irritating effects of disinfection by-products in swimming pools].
Erdinger L; Kirsch F; Sonntag HG
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1998 Feb; 200(5-6):491-503. PubMed ID: 9531722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Behind-the-Knee test: an efficient model for evaluating mechanical and chemical irritation.
Farage MA
Skin Res Technol; 2006 May; 12(2):73-82. PubMed ID: 16626379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Skin irritation and sensitization: mechanisms and new approaches for risk assessment. 1. Skin irritation.
Fluhr JW; Darlenski R; Angelova-Fischer I; Tsankov N; Basketter D
Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2008; 21(3):124-35. PubMed ID: 18523410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative assessment of the acute skin irritation potential of detergent formulations using a novel human 4-h patch test method.
Robinson MK; Kruszewski FH; Al-Atrash J; Blazka ME; Gingell R; Heitfeld FA; Mallon D; Snyder NK; Swanson JE; Casterton PL
Food Chem Toxicol; 2005 Dec; 43(12):1703-12. PubMed ID: 16026914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
