These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11049183)

  • 1. Validation of a Monte Carlo dose calculation tool for radiotherapy treatment planning.
    Li JS; Pawlicki T; Deng J; Jiang SB; Mok E; Ma CM
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Oct; 45(10):2969-85. PubMed ID: 11049183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Monte Carlo dose calculation tool for radiotherapy treatment planning.
    Ma CM; Li JS; Pawlicki T; Jiang SB; Deng J; Lee MC; Koumrian T; Luxton M; Brain S
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 May; 47(10):1671-89. PubMed ID: 12069086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. First macro Monte Carlo based commercial dose calculation module for electron beam treatment planning--new issues for clinical consideration.
    Ding GX; Duggan DM; Coffey CW; Shokrani P; Cygler JE
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 51(11):2781-99. PubMed ID: 16723766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of PENFAST--a fast Monte Carlo code for dose calculations in photon and electron radiotherapy treatment planning.
    Habib B; Poumarede B; Tola F; Barthe J
    Phys Med; 2010 Jan; 26(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 19342258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monte Carlo simulation and dosimetric verification of radiotherapy beam modifiers.
    Spezi E; Lewis DG; Smith CW
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):3007-29. PubMed ID: 11720360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
    Ali I; Ahmad S
    Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dose verification of an IMRT treatment planning system with the BEAM EGS4-based Monte Carlo code.
    Francescon P; Cora S; Chiovati P
    Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):144-57. PubMed ID: 12607832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical implementation of a Monte Carlo treatment planning system.
    Ma CM; Mok E; Kapur A; Pawlicki T; Findley D; Brain S; Forster K; Boyer AL
    Med Phys; 1999 Oct; 26(10):2133-43. PubMed ID: 10535630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Total skin electron therapy treatment verification: Monte Carlo simulation and beam characteristics of large non-standard electron fields.
    Pavón EC; Sánchez-Doblado F; Leal A; Capote R; Lagares JI; Perucha M; Arráns R
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Sep; 48(17):2783-96. PubMed ID: 14516101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of dose calculation algorithms with Monte Carlo methods for photon arcs.
    Chow JC; Wong E; Chen JZ; Van Dyk J
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2686-94. PubMed ID: 14596305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of electron beam dose calculation accuracy between treatment planning systems using either a pencil beam or a Monte Carlo algorithm.
    Ding GX; Cygler JE; Yu CW; Kalach NI; Daskalov G
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):622-33. PubMed ID: 16168854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation of the Swiss Monte Carlo Plan for a static and dynamic 6 MV photon beam.
    Magaddino V; Manser P; Frei D; Volken W; Schmidhalter D; Hirschi L; Fix MK
    Z Med Phys; 2011 May; 21(2):124-34. PubMed ID: 21239148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical implementation of full Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton beam therapy.
    Paganetti H; Jiang H; Parodi K; Slopsema R; Engelsman M
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4825-53. PubMed ID: 18701772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Independent dose verification system with Monte Carlo simulations using TOPAS for passive scattering proton therapy at the National Cancer Center in Korea.
    Shin WG; Testa M; Kim HS; Jeong JH; Lee SB; Kim YJ; Min CH
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7598-7616. PubMed ID: 28809759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of measured and Monte Carlo calculated dose distributions from the NRC linac.
    Sheikh-Bagheri D; Rogers DW; Ross CK; Seuntjens JP
    Med Phys; 2000 Oct; 27(10):2256-66. PubMed ID: 11099192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determination of the initial beam parameters in Monte Carlo linac simulation.
    Aljarrah K; Sharp GC; Neicu T; Jiang SB
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):850-8. PubMed ID: 16696460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of a commercial Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for electron treatment planning.
    Huang JY; Dunkerley D; Smilowitz JB
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 20(6):184-193. PubMed ID: 31120615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.
    Vanderstraeten B; Reynaert N; Paelinck L; Madani I; De Wagter C; De Gersem W; De Neve W; Thierens H
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3149-58. PubMed ID: 17022207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monte carlo electron source model validation for an Elekta Precise linac.
    Ali OA; Willemse CA; Shaw W; O'Reilly FH; du Plessis FC
    Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2366-73. PubMed ID: 21776771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of two commercial electron beam algorithms over regions close to the lung-mediastinum interface, against Monte Carlo simulation and point dosimetry in virtual and anthropomorphic phantoms.
    Ojala J; Hyödynmaa S; Barańczyk R; Góra E; Waligórski MP
    Phys Med; 2014 Mar; 30(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 23702438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.