BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11049183)

  • 1. Validation of a Monte Carlo dose calculation tool for radiotherapy treatment planning.
    Li JS; Pawlicki T; Deng J; Jiang SB; Mok E; Ma CM
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Oct; 45(10):2969-85. PubMed ID: 11049183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Monte Carlo dose calculation tool for radiotherapy treatment planning.
    Ma CM; Li JS; Pawlicki T; Jiang SB; Deng J; Lee MC; Koumrian T; Luxton M; Brain S
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 May; 47(10):1671-89. PubMed ID: 12069086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. First macro Monte Carlo based commercial dose calculation module for electron beam treatment planning--new issues for clinical consideration.
    Ding GX; Duggan DM; Coffey CW; Shokrani P; Cygler JE
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 51(11):2781-99. PubMed ID: 16723766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of PENFAST--a fast Monte Carlo code for dose calculations in photon and electron radiotherapy treatment planning.
    Habib B; Poumarede B; Tola F; Barthe J
    Phys Med; 2010 Jan; 26(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 19342258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monte Carlo simulation and dosimetric verification of radiotherapy beam modifiers.
    Spezi E; Lewis DG; Smith CW
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):3007-29. PubMed ID: 11720360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
    Ali I; Ahmad S
    Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dose verification of an IMRT treatment planning system with the BEAM EGS4-based Monte Carlo code.
    Francescon P; Cora S; Chiovati P
    Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):144-57. PubMed ID: 12607832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical implementation of a Monte Carlo treatment planning system.
    Ma CM; Mok E; Kapur A; Pawlicki T; Findley D; Brain S; Forster K; Boyer AL
    Med Phys; 1999 Oct; 26(10):2133-43. PubMed ID: 10535630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Total skin electron therapy treatment verification: Monte Carlo simulation and beam characteristics of large non-standard electron fields.
    Pavón EC; Sánchez-Doblado F; Leal A; Capote R; Lagares JI; Perucha M; Arráns R
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Sep; 48(17):2783-96. PubMed ID: 14516101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of dose calculation algorithms with Monte Carlo methods for photon arcs.
    Chow JC; Wong E; Chen JZ; Van Dyk J
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2686-94. PubMed ID: 14596305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of electron beam dose calculation accuracy between treatment planning systems using either a pencil beam or a Monte Carlo algorithm.
    Ding GX; Cygler JE; Yu CW; Kalach NI; Daskalov G
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):622-33. PubMed ID: 16168854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation of the Swiss Monte Carlo Plan for a static and dynamic 6 MV photon beam.
    Magaddino V; Manser P; Frei D; Volken W; Schmidhalter D; Hirschi L; Fix MK
    Z Med Phys; 2011 May; 21(2):124-34. PubMed ID: 21239148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical implementation of full Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton beam therapy.
    Paganetti H; Jiang H; Parodi K; Slopsema R; Engelsman M
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4825-53. PubMed ID: 18701772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Independent dose verification system with Monte Carlo simulations using TOPAS for passive scattering proton therapy at the National Cancer Center in Korea.
    Shin WG; Testa M; Kim HS; Jeong JH; Lee SB; Kim YJ; Min CH
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7598-7616. PubMed ID: 28809759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of measured and Monte Carlo calculated dose distributions from the NRC linac.
    Sheikh-Bagheri D; Rogers DW; Ross CK; Seuntjens JP
    Med Phys; 2000 Oct; 27(10):2256-66. PubMed ID: 11099192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determination of the initial beam parameters in Monte Carlo linac simulation.
    Aljarrah K; Sharp GC; Neicu T; Jiang SB
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):850-8. PubMed ID: 16696460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of a commercial Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm for electron treatment planning.
    Huang JY; Dunkerley D; Smilowitz JB
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 20(6):184-193. PubMed ID: 31120615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.
    Vanderstraeten B; Reynaert N; Paelinck L; Madani I; De Wagter C; De Gersem W; De Neve W; Thierens H
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3149-58. PubMed ID: 17022207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monte carlo electron source model validation for an Elekta Precise linac.
    Ali OA; Willemse CA; Shaw W; O'Reilly FH; du Plessis FC
    Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2366-73. PubMed ID: 21776771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of two commercial electron beam algorithms over regions close to the lung-mediastinum interface, against Monte Carlo simulation and point dosimetry in virtual and anthropomorphic phantoms.
    Ojala J; Hyödynmaa S; Barańczyk R; Góra E; Waligórski MP
    Phys Med; 2014 Mar; 30(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 23702438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.