130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11049185)
1. Monte Carlo dose calculations and radiobiological modelling: analysis of the effect of the statistical noise of the dose distribution on the probability of tumour control.
Buffa FM; Nahum AE
Phys Med Biol; 2000 Oct; 45(10):3009-23. PubMed ID: 11049185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Coupling I-125 permanent implant prostate brachytherapy Monte Carlo dose calculations with radiobiological models.
Miksys N; Haidari M; Vigneault E; Martin AG; Beaulieu L; Thomson RM
Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):4329-4340. PubMed ID: 28455849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Removing the effect of statistical uncertainty on dose-volume histograms from Monte Carlo dose calculations.
Jiang SB; Pawlicki T; Ma CM
Phys Med Biol; 2000 Aug; 45(8):2151-61. PubMed ID: 10958186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. EUD-based radiotherapy treatment plan evaluation: incorporating physical and Monte Carlo statistical dose uncertainties.
Cranmer-Sargison G; Zavgorodni S
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):4097-109. PubMed ID: 16177533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A TCP-NTCP estimation module using DVHs and known radiobiological models and parameter sets.
Warkentin B; Stavrev P; Stavreva N; Field C; Fallone BG
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2004; 5(1):50-63. PubMed ID: 15753933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Latent uncertainties of the precalculated track Monte Carlo method.
Renaud MA; Roberge D; Seuntjens J
Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):479-90. PubMed ID: 25563287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Response-probability volume histograms and iso-probability of response charts in treatment plan evaluation.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Lopes Mdo C
Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2382-97. PubMed ID: 21776773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Limitations of a convolution method for modeling geometric uncertainties in radiation therapy: the radiobiological dose-per-fraction effect.
Song W; Battista J; Van Dyk J
Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):3034-45. PubMed ID: 15587657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the first commercial Monte Carlo dose calculation engine for electron beam treatment planning.
Cygler JE; Daskalov GM; Chan GH; Ding GX
Med Phys; 2004 Jan; 31(1):142-53. PubMed ID: 14761030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accelerating Monte Carlo simulations of radiation therapy dose distributions using wavelet threshold de-noising.
Deasy JO; Wickerhauser MV; Picard M
Med Phys; 2002 Oct; 29(10):2366-73. PubMed ID: 12408311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modelling the effect of spread in radiosensitivity parameters and repopulation rate on the probability of tumour control.
Stavreva N; Stavrev P; Balabanova A; Nahum A; Ruggieri R; Pressyanov D
Phys Med; 2019 Jul; 63():79-86. PubMed ID: 31221413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fitting tumor control probability models to biopsy outcome after three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy of prostate cancer: pitfalls in deducing radiobiologic parameters for tumors from clinical data.
Levegrün S; Jackson A; Zelefsky MJ; Skwarchuk MW; Venkatraman ES; Schlegel W; Fuks Z; Leibel SA; Ling CC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Nov; 51(4):1064-80. PubMed ID: 11704332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 3D calculation of absorbed dose for 131I-targeted radiotherapy: a Monte Carlo study.
Saeedzadeh E; Sarkar S; Abbaspour Tehrani-Fard A; Ay MR; Khosravi HR; Loudos G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jul; 150(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 22069233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The modelled benefits of individualizing radiotherapy patients' dose using cellular radiosensitivity assays with inherent variability.
Mackay RI; Hendry JH
Radiother Oncol; 1999 Jan; 50(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 10225559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Build-up and surface dose measurements on phantoms using micro-MOSFET in 6 and 10 MV x-ray beams and comparisons with Monte Carlo calculations.
Xiang HF; Song JS; Chin DW; Cormack RA; Tishler RB; Makrigiorgos GM; Court LE; Chin LM
Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1266-73. PubMed ID: 17500458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Determination of the initial beam parameters in Monte Carlo linac simulation.
Aljarrah K; Sharp GC; Neicu T; Jiang SB
Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):850-8. PubMed ID: 16696460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differences among Monte Carlo codes in the calculations of voxel S values for radionuclide targeted therapy and analysis of their impact on absorbed dose evaluations.
Pacilio M; Lanconelli N; Lo MS; Betti M; Montani L; Torres AL; Coca PM
Med Phys; 2009 May; 36(5):1543-52. PubMed ID: 19544770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Loss of local control due to tumor displacement as a function of margin size, dose-response slope, and number of fractions.
Selvaraj J; Uzan J; Baker C; Nahum A
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041715. PubMed ID: 23556885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biological optimization of heterogeneous dose distributions in systemic radiotherapy.
Strigari L; D'Andrea M; Maini CL; Sciuto R; Benassi M
Med Phys; 2006 Jun; 33(6):1857-66. PubMed ID: 16872093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Application of the equivalent uniform stochastic dose (EUSD) to TCP calculations incorporating dose uncertainty and fractionation effects.
Zavgorodni S
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2008 Mar; 31(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 18488958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
