103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11050609)
1. Highlighting of intervertebral movements and variations of intradiskal pressure during lumbar spine manipulation: a feasibility study.
Maigne JY; Guillon F
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2000 Oct; 23(8):531-5. PubMed ID: 11050609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of pressure effects on adjacent disk levels after 2-level lumbar constructs: fusion, hybrid, and total disk replacement.
Nunley PD; Jawahar A; Mukherjee DP; Ogden A; Khan Z; Kerr EJ; Cavanaugh DA
Surg Neurol; 2008 Sep; 70(3):247-51; discussion 251. PubMed ID: 18617238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A biomechanical assessment of disc pressures in the lumbosacral spine in response to external unloading forces.
Ferrara L; Triano JJ; Sohn MJ; Song E; Lee DD
Spine J; 2005; 5(5):548-53. PubMed ID: 16153584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of slouching and lumbar support on iliolumbar ligaments, intervertebral discs and sacroiliac joints.
Snijders CJ; Hermans PF; Niesing R; Spoor CW; Stoeckart R
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 May; 19(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 15109750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adjacent segment motion after a simulated lumbar fusion in different sagittal alignments: a biomechanical analysis.
Akamaru T; Kawahara N; Tim Yoon S; Minamide A; Su Kim K; Tomita K; Hutton WC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jul; 28(14):1560-6. PubMed ID: 12865845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Cunningham BW; Gordon JD; Dmitriev AE; Hu N; McAfee PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S110-7. PubMed ID: 14560182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Forces and relative vertebral movements during SMT to unembalmed post-rigor human cadavers: peculiarities associated with joint cavitation.
Gál JM; Herzog W; Kawchuk GN; Conway PJ; Zhang YT
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1995 Jan; 18(1):4-9. PubMed ID: 7706960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Erkan S; Rivera Y; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE
Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):830-5. PubMed ID: 19477692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Disc arthroplasty design influences intervertebral kinematics and facet forces.
Rousseau MA; Bradford DS; Bertagnoli R; Hu SS; Lotz JC
Spine J; 2006; 6(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 16651219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Changes in spinal height following sustained lumbar flexion and extension postures: a clinical measure of intervertebral disc hydration using stadiometry.
Owens SC; Brismée JM; Pennell PN; Dedrick GS; Sizer PS; James CR
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2009 Jun; 32(5):358-63. PubMed ID: 19539118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanics of two-level Charité artificial disc placement in comparison to fusion plus single-level disc placement combination.
Grauer JN; Biyani A; Faizan A; Kiapour A; Sairyo K; Ivanov A; Ebraheim NA; Patel TCh; Goel VK
Spine J; 2006; 6(6):659-66. PubMed ID: 17088196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Movements of vertebrae during manipulative thrusts to unembalmed human cadavers.
Gál J; Herzog W; Kawchuk G; Conway PJ; Zhang YT
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1997 Jan; 20(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 9004120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Junction kinematics between proximal mobile and distal fused lumbar segments: biomechanical analysis of pedicle and hook constructs.
Hongo M; Gay RE; Zhao KD; Ilharreborde B; Huddleston PM; Berglund LJ; An KN; Zhao C
Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):846-53. PubMed ID: 19660990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Anatomical background of low back pain: variability and degeneration of the lumbar spinal canal and intervertebral disc].
van Roy P; Barbaix E; Clarijs JP; Mense S
Schmerz; 2001 Dec; 15(6):418-24. PubMed ID: 11793145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Response of Charité total disc replacement under physiologic loads: prosthesis component motion patterns.
O'Leary P; Nicolakis M; Lorenz MA; Voronov LI; Zindrick MR; Ghanayem A; Havey RM; Carandang G; Sartori M; Gaitanis IN; Fronczak S; Patwardhan AG
Spine J; 2005; 5(6):590-9. PubMed ID: 16291097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The biomechanics of the lumbosacral region in acute and chronic low back pain patients.
Nakipoğlu GF; Karagöz A; Ozgirgin N
Pain Physician; 2008; 11(4):505-11. PubMed ID: 18690279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Revision strategies for single- and two-level total disc arthroplasty procedures: a biomechanical perspective.
Cunningham BW; Hu N; Beatson HJ; Serhan H; Sefter JC; McAfee PC
Spine J; 2009 Sep; 9(9):735-43. PubMed ID: 19477694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanics of posterior dynamic stabilizing device (DIAM) after facetectomy and discectomy.
Phillips FM; Voronov LI; Gaitanis IN; Carandang G; Havey RM; Patwardhan AG
Spine J; 2006; 6(6):714-22. PubMed ID: 17088203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intradiskal pressure and volume recording: evaluation of normal and abnormal cervical disks.
Kambin P; Abda S; Kurpicki F
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1980; (146):144-7. PubMed ID: 7371242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Neuromechanical characterization of in vivo lumbar spinal manipulation. Part I. Vertebral motion.
Keller TS; Colloca CJ; Gunzburg R
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2003; 26(9):567-78. PubMed ID: 14673406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
