These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11051009)

  • 1. [Robotics-assisted implantation of femoral components in hip endoprosthetics--an experimental study].
    Jerosch J; Finken N; Filler T; Peuker E; Rahgozar M; Lahmer A; Witzel U
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1999; 137(4):Oa7-12. PubMed ID: 11051009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. INNOMOTION for percutaneous image-guided interventions: principles and evaluation of this MR- and CT-compatible robotic system.
    Melzer A; Gutmann B; Remmele T; Wolf R; Lukoscheck A; Bock M; Bardenheuer H; Fischer H
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2008; 27(3):66-73. PubMed ID: 18519184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Computer-assisted orthopedic surgery (CAOS) in hip replacement surgery].
    Anders M
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1999; 137(5):462. PubMed ID: 10549127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Computer-assisted navigated acetabulum placement in hip prosthesis implantation--application study in routine clinical care].
    Bernsmann K; Langlotz U; Ansari B; Wiese M
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2000; 138(6):515-21. PubMed ID: 11199417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The dimensional accuracy for preparation of the femoral cavity in HIP arthroplasty. A comparison between manual- and robot-assisted implantation of hip endoprosthesis stems in cadaver femurs.
    Prymka M; Wu L; Hahne HJ; Koebke J; Hassenpflug J
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2006 Jan; 126(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 16341537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A C-arm fluoroscopy-guided progressive cut refinement strategy using a surgical robot.
    Yao J; Taylor RH; Goldberg RP; Kumar R; Bzostek A; Van Vorhis R; Kazanzides P; Gueziec A
    Comput Aided Surg; 2000; 5(6):373-90. PubMed ID: 11295851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
    Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computer-assisted total hip arthroplasty: coding the next generation of navigation systems for orthopedic surgery.
    Renkawitz T; Tingart M; Grifka J; Sendtner E; Kalteis T
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2009 Sep; 6(5):507-14. PubMed ID: 19751123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Navigation assisted implantation versus robotic operation. The physician operates better than Robodoc].
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2004 May; 146(21):6. PubMed ID: 15373073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Expanded reality in head surgery].
    Hoppe H; Salb T; Raczkowsky J; Hassfeld S; Moctezuma JL; Wörn H; Dillmann R
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2002; 47 Suppl 1 Pt 2():946-9. PubMed ID: 12465352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [ROBODOC--a path into the future of hip endoprosthetics or an investment error?].
    Birke A; Reichel H; Hein W; Schietsch U; Hube R; Bernstein A; Krüger T
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2000; 138(5):395-401. PubMed ID: 11084738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Surgical robot in endoprosthetics. How CASPAR assists on the hip] the hip].
    Paul A
    MMW Fortschr Med; 1999 Aug; 141(33):18. PubMed ID: 10766540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 3D structure from endoscopic images.
    Kübler C; Heinze P; Raczkowsky J; Wörn H
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 85():252-4. PubMed ID: 15458096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MRI-Compatible Robotics.
    Gassert R; Burdet E; Chinzei K
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2008; 27(3):12-4. PubMed ID: 18519176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Computer-assisted robotics in hip endoprosthesis implantation].
    Börner M; Bauer A; Lahmer A
    Unfallchirurg; 1997 Aug; 100(8):640-5. PubMed ID: 9381212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tailor-made surgical guide based on rapid prototyping technique for cup insertion in total hip arthroplasty.
    Hananouchi T; Saito M; Koyama T; Hagio K; Murase T; Sugano N; Yoshikawa H
    Int J Med Robot; 2009 Jun; 5(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 19248055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fluoroscopic navigation system for hip surface replacement.
    Belei P; Skwara A; De La Fuente M; Schkommodau E; Fuchs S; Wirtz DC; Kämper C; Radermacher K
    Comput Aided Surg; 2007 May; 12(3):160-7. PubMed ID: 17538788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Virtual simulation system for collision avoidance for medical robot.
    Gonchar L; Engel D; Raczkowsky J; Wörn H
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 81():168-70. PubMed ID: 11317732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [German patients as experimental rabbits. Spiegel Magazine reports on implantation of hip endoprostheses with ROBODOC].
    Englehardt R
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(1):21. PubMed ID: 12647738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intraoperative guidance of pre-planned bone deformations with a surface scanning system.
    Däuber S; Hoppe H; Krempien R; Hassfeld S; Brief J; Wörn H
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 85():110-5. PubMed ID: 15458069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.