These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Guidelines for Use of the Approximate Beta-Poisson Dose-Response Model. Xie G; Roiko A; Stratton H; Lemckert C; Dunn PK; Mengersen K Risk Anal; 2017 Jul; 37(7):1388-1402. PubMed ID: 27704592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of the dose-response relationship of Campylobacter jejuni. Medema GJ; Teunis PF; Havelaar AH; Haas CN Int J Food Microbiol; 1996 Jun; 30(1-2):101-11. PubMed ID: 8856377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. QMRA for Drinking Water: 2. The Effect of Pathogen Clustering in Single-Hit Dose-Response Models. Nilsen V; Wyller J Risk Anal; 2016 Jan; 36(1):163-81. PubMed ID: 26812258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. QMRA for Drinking Water: 1. Revisiting the Mathematical Structure of Single-Hit Dose-Response Models. Nilsen V; Wyller J Risk Anal; 2016 Jan; 36(1):145-62. PubMed ID: 26812257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing the uncertainty in QUANTEC's dose-response relation of lung and spinal cord with a bootstrap analysis. Wedenberg M Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Nov; 87(4):795-801. PubMed ID: 23953634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A reconsideration of the Campylobacter dose-response relation. Teunis P; Van den Brandhof W; Nauta M; Wagenaar J; Van den Kerkhof H; Van Pelt W Epidemiol Infect; 2005 Aug; 133(4):583-92. PubMed ID: 16050502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of six dose-response models for use with food-borne pathogens. Holcomb DL; Smith MA; Ware GO; Hung YC; Brackett RE; Doyle MP Risk Anal; 1999 Dec; 19(6):1091-100. PubMed ID: 10765449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dose response for infectivity of several strains of Campylobacter jejuni in chickens. Chen L; Geys H; Cawthraw S; Havelaar A; Teunis P Risk Anal; 2006 Dec; 26(6):1613-21. PubMed ID: 17184401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative risk assessment: is more complex always better? Simple is not stupid and complex is not always more correct. Zwietering MH Int J Food Microbiol; 2009 Aug; 134(1-2):57-62. PubMed ID: 19171404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cryptosporidium Infection Risk: Results of New Dose-Response Modeling. Messner MJ; Berger P Risk Anal; 2016 Oct; 36(10):1969-1982. PubMed ID: 26773806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Model averaging in microbial risk assessment using fractional polynomials. Namata H; Aerts M; Faes C; Teunis P Risk Anal; 2008 Aug; 28(4):891-905. PubMed ID: 18564995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Topics in dose-response modeling. Coleman M; Marks H J Food Prot; 1998 Nov; 61(11):1550-9. PubMed ID: 9829203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk/benefit assessments of human diseases: optimum dose for intervention. Gaylor DW Risk Anal; 2005 Feb; 25(1):161-8. PubMed ID: 15787765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Discerning strain effects in microbial dose-response data. Coleman ME; Marks HM; Golden NJ; Latimer HK J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2004 Apr 23-May 28; 67(8-10):667-85. PubMed ID: 15192861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application of the log-Logistic Model to Dose Response Relation in Microbial Risk Assessment. Fujikawa H Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi; 2021; 62(2):37-43. PubMed ID: 33883334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reassessing benzene risks using internal doses and Monte-Carlo uncertainty analysis. Cox LA Environ Health Perspect; 1996 Dec; 104 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):1413-29. PubMed ID: 9118928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]