These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11051433)

  • 1. Function of a hearing aid under stressful conditions.
    Welsh LW; Welsh JJ; Rosen LF
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2000 Oct; 109(10 Pt 1):929-39. PubMed ID: 11051433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech recognition threshold in noise: effects of hearing loss, frequency response, and speech materials.
    Van Tasell DJ; Yanz JL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Sep; 30(3):377-86. PubMed ID: 3669644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Aspects of auditory speech perception in cochlear implant and hearing aid managed children].
    Junge FM; Dahm MC; Braun O
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1997; 147(10):255-8. PubMed ID: 9324868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech perception in noise using directional microphones in open-canal hearing aids.
    Klemp EJ; Dhar S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008; 19(7):571-8. PubMed ID: 19248734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predictors of aided speech recognition, with and without frequency compression, in older adults.
    Ellis RJ; Munro KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 54(7):467-75. PubMed ID: 25751599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of noise on word discrimination by subjects with impaired hearing, compared with those with normal hearing.
    Pekkarinen E; Salmivalli A; Suonpää J
    Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 2336538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Audiological results with the cochlear implant.
    Thielemeir MA; Brimacombe JA; Eisenberg LS
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1982; 91(2 Pt 3):27-34. PubMed ID: 6805394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Unilateral and bilateral hearing aids, spatial release from masking and auditory acclimatization.
    Dawes P; Munro KJ; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):596-606. PubMed ID: 23862834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Active middle ear implant compared with open-fit hearing aid in sloping high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Boeheim K; Pok SM; Schloegel M; Filzmoser P
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Apr; 31(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 20042907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing speech recognition abilities with digits in noise in cochlear implant and hearing aid users.
    Kaandorp MW; Smits C; Merkus P; Goverts ST; Festen JM
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jan; 54(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 25156097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Cochlear implant in patients with residual hearing].
    Ruh S; Battmer RD; Strauss-Schier A; Lenarz T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 Jun; 76(6):347-50. PubMed ID: 9333278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of extended-range frequency-response amplification in hearing aids.
    Forrester JI; Raffin MJ
    J Aud Res; 1982 Jan; 22(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 7187908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of audiovisual ceiling performance on the relationship between reverberation and directional benefit: perception and prediction.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):604-14. PubMed ID: 22677815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Benefit from non-linear frequency compression hearing aids in a clinical setting: the effects of duration of experience and severity of high-frequency hearing loss.
    Hopkins K; Khanom M; Dickinson AM; Munro KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Apr; 53(4):219-28. PubMed ID: 24617592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Benefit from, and acclimatization to, frequency compression hearing aids in experienced adult hearing-aid users.
    Ellis RJ; Munro KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jan; 54(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 25470620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory handicap of hearing impairment and the limited benefit of hearing aids.
    Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Feb; 63(2):533-49. PubMed ID: 670550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.