These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11051496)

  • 1. Acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging.
    Ravicz ME; Melcher JR; Kiang NY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Oct; 108(4):1683-96. PubMed ID: 11051496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of magnetic resonance imaging acoustic noise generated by a 4.7 T experimental system.
    Counter SA; Olofsson A; Borg E; Bjelke B; Häggström A; Grahn HF
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2000 Sep; 120(6):739-43. PubMed ID: 11099151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustic FMRI noise: linear time-invariant system model.
    Rizzo Sierra CV; Versluis MJ; Hoogduin JM; Duifhuis HD
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Sep; 55(9):2115-23. PubMed ID: 18713680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging acoustic noise reduction technology by magnetic gradient waveform control.
    Yamashiro T; Morita K; Nakajima K
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Nov; 63():170-177. PubMed ID: 31425801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationship between magnetic field strength and magnetic-resonance-related acoustic noise levels.
    Moelker A; Wielopolski PA; Pattynama PM
    MAGMA; 2003 Feb; 16(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 12695886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acoustic noise generated by TMS in typical environment and inside an MRI scanner.
    Nyrhinen MJ; Souza VH; Ilmoniemi RJ; Lin FH
    Brain Stimul; 2024; 17(2):184-193. PubMed ID: 38342363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Isolating the auditory system from acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging: examination of noise conduction through the ear canal, head, and body.
    Ravicz ME; Melcher JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jan; 109(1):216-31. PubMed ID: 11206150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial analysis of acoustic noise transfer function with a human-body phantom in a clinical MRI scanner.
    Hamaguchi T; Miyati T; Ohno N; Matsushita T; Takata T; Matsuura Y; Kobayashi S; Gabata T
    Acta Radiol; 2023 Mar; 64(3):1212-1221. PubMed ID: 35538857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficacy of passive acoustic screening: implications for the design of imager and MR-suite.
    Moelker A; Vogel MW; Pattynama PM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2003 Feb; 17(2):270-5. PubMed ID: 12541235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Technical Note: Compact three-tesla magnetic resonance imager with high-performance gradients passes ACR image quality and acoustic noise tests.
    Weavers PT; Shu Y; Tao S; Huston J; Lee SK; Graziani D; Mathieu JB; Trzasko JD; Foo TK; Bernstein MA
    Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1259-64. PubMed ID: 26936710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. fMRI-acoustic noise alters brain activation during working memory tasks.
    Tomasi D; Caparelli EC; Chang L; Ernst T
    Neuroimage; 2005 Aug; 27(2):377-86. PubMed ID: 15893942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acoustic noise concerns in functional magnetic resonance imaging.
    Moelker A; Pattynama PM
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2003 Nov; 20(3):123-41. PubMed ID: 14601139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Measurement of noise protection in functional magnetic resonance imaging].
    Liener K; Wunderlich A; Ehret G; Bachor E
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Feb; 84(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 15712046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Single point imaging with suppressed sound pressure levels through gradient-shape adjustment.
    Latta P; Gruwel ML; Edie E; Srámek M; Tomanek B
    J Magn Reson; 2004 Oct; 170(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 15388078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory intensity processing: Effect of MRI background noise.
    Angenstein N; Stadler J; Brechmann A
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():87-92. PubMed ID: 26778471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of acoustic gradient noise from functional magnetic resonance imaging on auditory processing as reflected by event-related brain potentials.
    Novitski N; Alho K; Korzyukov O; Carlson S; Martinkauppi S; Escera C; Rinne T; Aronen HJ; Näätänen R
    Neuroimage; 2001 Jul; 14(1 Pt 1):244-51. PubMed ID: 11525334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Noise in magnetic resonance imaging: no risk for sensorineural function but increased amplitude variability of otoacoustic emissions.
    Wagner W; Staud I; Frank G; Dammann F; Plontke S; Plinkert PK
    Laryngoscope; 2003 Jul; 113(7):1216-23. PubMed ID: 12838022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shaping and timing gradient pulses to reduce MRI acoustic noise.
    Segbers M; Rizzo Sierra CV; Duifhuis H; Hoogduin JM
    Magn Reson Med; 2010 Aug; 64(2):546-53. PubMed ID: 20665798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Simulation study of noise reduction methods for a split MRI system using a finite element method.
    Wang Y; Liu F; Crozier S
    Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):7122-31. PubMed ID: 26632066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electromagnetic stimulation of the auditory system: effects and side-effects.
    Counter SA
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 37():1-32. PubMed ID: 8210963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.