These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11051513)

  • 1. Sources of listener disagreement in voice quality assessment.
    Kreiman J; Gerratt BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Oct; 108(4):1867-76. PubMed ID: 11051513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring vocal quality with speech synthesis.
    Gerratt BR; Kreiman J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov; 110(5 Pt 1):2560-6. PubMed ID: 11757945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When and why listeners disagree in voice quality assessment tasks.
    Kreiman J; Gerratt BR; Ito M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2354-64. PubMed ID: 17902870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The multidimensional nature of pathologic vocal quality.
    Kreiman J; Gerratt BR; Berke GS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Sep; 96(3):1291-302. PubMed ID: 7962996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perception of aperiodicity in pathological voice.
    Kreiman J; Gerratt BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Apr; 117(4 Pt 1):2201-11. PubMed ID: 15898661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Objective measures of breathy voice quality obtained using an auditory model.
    Shrivastav R; Sapienza CM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2217-24. PubMed ID: 14587619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of Auditory-Perceptual Training With Natural Voice Anchors on Vocal Quality Evaluation.
    Dos Santos PCM; Vieira MN; Sansão JPH; Gama ACC
    J Voice; 2019 Mar; 33(2):220-225. PubMed ID: 29331406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners' judgments of dysphonic voice.
    Eadie TL; Baylor CR
    J Voice; 2006 Dec; 20(4):527-44. PubMed ID: 16324823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of age on speech and voice quality ratings.
    Goy H; Kathleen Pichora-Fuller M; van Lieshout P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Apr; 139(4):1648. PubMed ID: 27106312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Individual differences in voice quality perception.
    Kreiman J; Gerratt BR; Precoda K; Berke GS
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Jun; 35(3):512-20. PubMed ID: 1608242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of listener experience on Consensus Auditory-perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) ratings of postthyroidectomy voice.
    Helou LB; Solomon NP; Henry LR; Coppit GL; Howard RS; Stojadinovic A
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2010 Aug; 19(3):248-58. PubMed ID: 20484704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual analysis in different voice samples: agreement and reliability.
    Muñoz J; Mendoza E; Fresneda MD; Carballo G; Ramirez I
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Jun; 94(3 Pt 2):1187-95. PubMed ID: 12186240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing reliability of perceptual ratings of roughness and acoustic measure of jitter.
    Rabinov CR; Kreiman J; Gerratt BR; Bielamowicz S
    J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Feb; 38(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 7731216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perception of dysphonic voice quality by naive listeners.
    Wolfe VI; Martin DP; Palmer CI
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Jun; 43(3):697-705. PubMed ID: 10877439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Listener experience and perception of voice quality.
    Kreiman J; Gerratt BR; Precoda K
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Mar; 33(1):103-15. PubMed ID: 2314068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reliability and confidence in using a paired comparison paradigm in perceptual voice quality evaluation.
    Yiu EM; Chan KM; Mok RS
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2007 Feb; 21(2):129-45. PubMed ID: 17364621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acoustic and perceptual indicators of normal and pathological voice.
    Muñoz J; Mendoza E; Fresneda MD; Carballo G; López P
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2003; 55(2):102-14. PubMed ID: 12697983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of visible speech in the perceptual rating of pathological voices.
    Martens JW; Versnel H; Dejonckere PH
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Feb; 133(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 17309988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing two methods for reducing variability in voice quality measurements.
    Kreiman J; Gerratt BR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 54(3):803-12. PubMed ID: 21081673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Classification of dysphonic voice: acoustic and auditory-perceptual measures.
    Eadie TL; Doyle PC
    J Voice; 2005 Mar; 19(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 15766846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.