These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11051513)

  • 21. What determines the differences in perceptual rating of dysphonia between experienced raters?
    Millet B; Dejonckere PH
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1998; 50(6):305-10. PubMed ID: 9925953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Acoustic correlates of vocal quality.
    Eskenazi L; Childers DG; Hicks DM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Jun; 33(2):298-306. PubMed ID: 2359270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparing two methods for reducing variability in voice quality measurements.
    Kreiman J; Gerratt BR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Jun; 54(3):803-12. PubMed ID: 21081673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Acoustic, aerodynamic, and perceptual analyses of the voice of cochlear-implanted children.
    Guerrero Lopez HA; Mondain M; Amy de la Bretèque B; Serrafero P; Trottier C; Barkat-Defradas M
    J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):523.e1-17. PubMed ID: 23809572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Testing the reliability of Grade, Roughness and Breathiness scores by means of synthetic speech stimuli.
    Schoentgen J; Fraj S; Lucero JC
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2015 Apr; 40(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 24117123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Modeling of Breathy Voice Quality Using Pitch-strength Estimates.
    Eddins DA; Anand S; Camacho A; Shrivastav R
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):774.e1-774.e7. PubMed ID: 26775221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Acoustic and linguistic factors affecting perceptual dissimilarity judgments of voices.
    Perrachione TK; Furbeck KT; Thurston EJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Nov; 146(5):3384. PubMed ID: 31795676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Perceptual and Acoustic Analyses of Good Voice Quality in Male Radio Performers.
    Warhurst S; Madill C; McCabe P; Ternström S; Yiu E; Heard R
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):259.e1-259.e12. PubMed ID: 27342753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Study on the stability of perceptual evaluation of voice quality].
    Wang G; Yu P; Xu W; Wen W; Wei CS; Huang DY; Hou LZ
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Jun; 46(6):485-90. PubMed ID: 21924100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Perceptual Error Analysis of Human and Synthesized Voices.
    Englert M; Madazio G; Gielow I; Lucero J; Behlau M
    J Voice; 2017 Jul; 31(4):516.e5-516.e18. PubMed ID: 28089485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A Two-Stage Cepstral Analysis Procedure for the Classification of Rough Voices.
    Awan SN; Awan JA
    J Voice; 2020 Jan; 34(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 30391019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cultural and language differences in voice quality perception: a preliminary investigation using synthesized signals.
    Yiu EM; Murdoch B; Hird K; Lau P; Ho EM
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2008; 60(3):107-19. PubMed ID: 18332632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Effect of Anchors and Training on the Reliability of Voice Quality Ratings for Different Types of Speech Stimuli.
    Brinca L; Batista AP; Tavares AI; Pinto PN; Araújo L
    J Voice; 2015 Nov; 29(6):776.e7-14. PubMed ID: 25795348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The role of experience on judgments of dysphonia.
    Eadie TL; Kapsner M; Rosenzweig J; Waugh P; Hillel A; Merati A
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):564-73. PubMed ID: 19765949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of consensus training on the reliability of auditory perceptual ratings of voice quality.
    Iwarsson J; Reinholt Petersen N
    J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):304-12. PubMed ID: 21840170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Acoustic measurement of voice quality in central dysphonia.
    Hartmann E; von Cramon D
    J Commun Disord; 1984 Nov; 17(6):425-40. PubMed ID: 6520236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Perceptual Error Identification of Human and Synthesized Voices.
    Englert M; Madazio G; Gielow I; Lucero J; Behlau M
    J Voice; 2016 Sep; 30(5):639.e17-23. PubMed ID: 26337775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Noise and tremor in the perception of vocal aging in males.
    Harnsberger JD; Brown WS; Shrivastav R; Rothman H
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):523-30. PubMed ID: 19815378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Continuous Vocal Fry Simulated in Laboratory Subjects: A Preliminary Report on Voice Production and Listener Ratings.
    Venkatraman A; Sivasankar MP
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2018 Nov; 27(4):1539-1545. PubMed ID: 30178028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The perceptual structure of pathologic voice quality.
    Kreiman J; Gerratt BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Sep; 100(3):1787-95. PubMed ID: 8817904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.