125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11051539)
1. Comparison of PM2.5 and PM10 monitors.
Williams R; Suggs J; Rodes C; Lawless P; Zweidinger R; Kwok R; Creason J; Sheldon L
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2000; 10(5):497-505. PubMed ID: 11051539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The 1998 Baltimore Particulate Matter Epidemiology-Exposure Study: part 1. Comparison of ambient, residential outdoor, indoor and apartment particulate matter monitoring.
Williams R; Suggs J; Zweidinger R; Evans G; Creason J; Kwok R; Rodes C; Lawless P; Sheldon L
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2000; 10(6 Pt 1):518-32. PubMed ID: 11140436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating heterogeneity in indoor and outdoor air pollution using land-use regression and constrained factor analysis.
Levy JI; Clougherty JE; Baxter LK; Houseman EA; Paciorek CJ;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2010 Dec; (152):5-80; discussion 81-91. PubMed ID: 21409949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Personal and ambient exposures to air toxics in Camden, New Jersey.
Lioy PJ; Fan Z; Zhang J; Georgopoulos P; Wang SW; Ohman-Strickland P; Wu X; Zhu X; Harrington J; Tang X; Meng Q; Jung KH; Kwon J; Hernandez M; Bonnano L; Held J; Neal J;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Aug; (160):3-127; discussion 129-51. PubMed ID: 22097188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The London low emission zone baseline study.
Kelly F; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Anderson HR; Barratt B; Beevers S; Cook D; Green D; Derwent D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Nov; (163):3-79. PubMed ID: 22315924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Personal exposure to particles in Banská Bystrica, Slovakia.
Brauer M; Hrubá F; Mihalíková E; Fabiánová E; Miskovic P; Plziková A; Lendacká M; Vandenberg J; Cullen A
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2000; 10(5):478-87. PubMed ID: 11051537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of four gravimetric fine particle sampling methods.
Yanosky JD; MacIntosh DL
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2001 Jun; 51(6):878-84. PubMed ID: 11417679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Design and evaluation of a portable PM
Tryner J; Quinn C; Windom BC; Volckens J
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2019 Aug; 21(8):1403-1415. PubMed ID: 31389929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Indoor and outdoor PM mass and number concentrations at schools in the Athens area.
Diapouli E; Chaloulakou A; Mihalopoulos N; Spyrellis N
Environ Monit Assess; 2008 Jan; 136(1-3):13-20. PubMed ID: 17458512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Primary research on indoor air concentration of particulate matter in residential house and its relationship with ambient pollution level].
Zhang Y; Li XY; Jiang LJ; Wei JR; Sheng X; Liu Y; Guo X
Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2005 Jul; 34(4):407-9. PubMed ID: 16229259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Field evaluation of particulate matter measurements using tapered element oscillating microbalance in a layer house.
Li QF; Wang-Li L; Liu Z; Heber AJ
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 Mar; 62(3):322-35. PubMed ID: 22482290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Characterization of fine particulate matter in Ohio: indoor, outdoor, and personal exposures.
Crist KC; Liu B; Kim M; Deshpande SR; John K
Environ Res; 2008 Jan; 106(1):62-71. PubMed ID: 17765218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Particulate matter in California: part 1--Intercomparison of several PM2.5, PM10-2.5, and PM10 monitoring networks.
Motallebi N; Taylor CA; Turkiewicz K; Croes BE
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2003 Dec; 53(12):1509-16. PubMed ID: 14700137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of continuous particle monitors for personal, indoor, and outdoor exposures.
Wallace LA; Wheeler AJ; Kearney J; Van Ryswyk K; You H; Kulka RH; Rasmussen PE; Brook JR; Xu X
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2011; 21(1):49-64. PubMed ID: 20502493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The 1998 Baltimore Particulate Matter Epidemiology-Exposure Study: part 2. Personal exposure assessment associated with an elderly study population.
Williams R; Suggs J; Creason J; Rodes C; Lawless P; Kwok R; Zweidinger R; Sheldon L
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2000; 10(6 Pt 1):533-43. PubMed ID: 11140437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving the correlations of ambient tapered element oscillating microbalance PM2.5 data and SHARP 5030 Federal Equivalent Method in Ontario: a multiple linear regression analysis.
Sofowote U; Su Y; Bitzos MM; Munoz A
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2014 Jan; 64(1):104-14. PubMed ID: 24620408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of light scattering devices and impactors for particulate measurements in indoor, outdoor, and personal environments.
Liu LJ; Slaughter JC; Larson TV
Environ Sci Technol; 2002 Jul; 36(13):2977-86. PubMed ID: 12144275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Roadside particulate air pollution in Bangkok.
Jinsart W; Tamura K; Loetkamonwit S; Thepanondh S; Karita K; Yano E
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2002 Sep; 52(9):1102-10. PubMed ID: 12269671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Feasibility of using low-cost portable particle monitors for measurement of fine and coarse particulate matter in urban ambient air.
Han I; Symanski E; Stock TH
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Mar; 67(3):330-340. PubMed ID: 27690287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Field evaluation of nanofilm detectors for measuring acidic particles in indoor and outdoor air.
Cohen BS; Heikkinen MS; Hazi Y; Gao H; Peters P; Lippmann M
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2004 Sep; (121):1-35; discussion 37-46. PubMed ID: 15553489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
