These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11053193)

  • 1. Seeing what you want to see in randomised controlled trials. Meta- analyses may suffer from interpretation bias too.
    Lindbaek M
    BMJ; 2000 Oct; 321(7268):1079. PubMed ID: 11053193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Association between unreported outcomes and effect size estimates in Cochrane meta-analyses.
    Furukawa TA; Watanabe N; Omori IM; Montori VM; Guyatt GH
    JAMA; 2007 Feb; 297(5):468-70. PubMed ID: 17284696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robustness assessments are needed to reduce bias in meta-analyses that include zero-event randomized trials.
    Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Mar; 104(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 19262513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?
    Moher D; Pham B; Jones A; Cook DJ; Jadad AR; Moher M; Tugwell P; Klassen TP
    Lancet; 1998 Aug; 352(9128):609-13. PubMed ID: 9746022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Meta-analysis and meta-analytic monitoring of clinical trials.
    Feinstein AR
    Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(12):1273-80; discussion 1281-3. PubMed ID: 8817801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis.
    Tierney JF; Stewart LA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 34(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 15561753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. PEDro's bias: summary quality scores should not be used in meta-analysis.
    da Costa BR; Hilfiker R; Egger M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jan; 66(1):75-7. PubMed ID: 23177896
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [A wide perspective on meta-analysis--may be of crucial significance for the patients].
    Gøtzsche PC
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2000 Sep; 120(23):2810. PubMed ID: 11107932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Graphical methods for detecting bias in meta-analysis.
    Ferrer RL
    Fam Med; 1998 Sep; 30(8):579-83. PubMed ID: 9773289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Meta-analyses and large randomized, controlled trials.
    Stewart LA; Parmar MK; Tierney JF
    N Engl J Med; 1998 Jan; 338(1):61; author reply 61-2. PubMed ID: 9424569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Meta-analyses and large randomized, controlled trials.
    Ioannidis JP; Cappelleri JC; Lau J
    N Engl J Med; 1998 Jan; 338(1):59; author reply 61-2. PubMed ID: 9424563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Single-center trials show larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: evidence from a meta-epidemiologic study.
    Dechartres A; Boutron I; Trinquart L; Charles P; Ravaud P
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 21727292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can trial quality be reliably assessed from published reports of cancer trials: evaluation of risk of bias assessments in systematic reviews.
    Vale CL; Tierney JF; Burdett S
    BMJ; 2013 Apr; 346():f1798. PubMed ID: 23610376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials.
    Pildal J; Hróbjartsson A; Jørgensen KJ; Hilden J; Altman DG; Gøtzsche PC
    Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 36(4):847-57. PubMed ID: 17517809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Re: Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
    Pereira C; Castilho E
    Am J Epidemiol; 2009 Mar; 169(6):783; author reply 783-4. PubMed ID: 19208724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Importance of a wide perspective on meta-analysis. It may be of crucial significance for the patients].
    Gøtzsche PC
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2000 Oct; 162(42):5601. PubMed ID: 11059294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A meta-epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials.
    Bialy L; Vandermeer B; Lacaze-Masmonteil T; Dryden DM; Hartling L
    Evid Based Child Health; 2014 Dec; 9(4):1052-9. PubMed ID: 25504975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can quality of clinical trials and meta-analyses be quantified?
    Ioannidis JP; Lau J
    Lancet; 1998 Aug; 352(9128):590-1. PubMed ID: 9746014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
    Shrier I; Boivin JF; Steele RJ; Platt RW; Furlan A; Kakuma R; Brophy J; Rossignol M
    Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 166(10):1203-9. PubMed ID: 17712019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in 'meta-epidemiological' research.
    Sterne JA; Jüni P; Schulz KF; Altman DG; Bartlett C; Egger M
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1513-24. PubMed ID: 12111917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.