These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11055152)

  • 41. Uninstructed BIAT faking when ego depleted or in normal state: differential effect on brain and behavior.
    Wolff W; Schindler S; Englert C; Brand R; Kissler J
    BMC Neurosci; 2016 May; 17(1):18. PubMed ID: 27142046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Liar! Liar! (when stakes are higher): Understanding how the overclaiming technique can be used to measure faking in personnel selection.
    Dunlop PD; Bourdage JS; de Vries RE; McNeill IM; Jorritsma K; Orchard M; Austen T; Baines T; Choe WK
    J Appl Psychol; 2020 Aug; 105(8):784-799. PubMed ID: 31714104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A comparison of the PAI and MMPI-2 as predictors of faking bad in college students.
    Blanchard DD; McGrath RE; Pogge DL; Khadivi A
    J Pers Assess; 2003 Apr; 80(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 12700022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. An Item-Level Analysis for Detecting Faking on Personality Tests: Appropriateness of Ideal Point Item Response Theory Models.
    Liu J; Zhang J
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():3090. PubMed ID: 32038431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Detection Of Faking on the Comrey Personality Scales.
    Comrey AL; Backer TE
    Multivariate Behav Res; 1975 Jul; 10(3):311-9. PubMed ID: 26829632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Measuring faking in the employment interview: development and validation of an interview faking behavior scale.
    Levashina J; Campion MA
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Nov; 92(6):1638-56. PubMed ID: 18020802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effects of positive impression management on the NEO Personality Inventory--Revised in a clinical population.
    Ballenger JF; Caldwell-Andrews A; Baer RA
    Psychol Assess; 2001 Jun; 13(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 11433800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The influence of item order on intentional response distortion in the assessment of high potentials: assessing pilot applicants.
    Khorramdel L; Kubinger KD; Uitz A
    Int J Psychol; 2014 Apr; 49(2):131-9. PubMed ID: 24811884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Applicant Faking of Personality Inventories in College Admission: Applicants' Shift From Honest Responses Is Unsystematic and Related to the Perceived Relevance for the Profession.
    Krammer G
    J Pers Assess; 2020; 102(6):758-769. PubMed ID: 31403324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Predicting instructed simulation and dissimulation when screening for depressive symptoms.
    Goerigk S; Hilbert S; Jobst A; Falkai P; Bühner M; Stachl C; Bischl B; Coors S; Ehring T; Padberg F; Sarubin N
    Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci; 2020 Mar; 270(2):153-168. PubMed ID: 30542818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The relation between self-reported psychopathic traits and distorted response styles: a meta-analytic review.
    Ray JV; Hall J; Rivera-Hudson N; Poythress NG; Lilienfeld SO; Morano M
    Personal Disord; 2013 Jan; 4(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 22452779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. To Fake or Not to Fake: Antecedents to Interview Faking, Warning Instructions, and Its Impact on Applicant Reactions.
    Law SJ; Bourdage J; O'Neill TA
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1771. PubMed ID: 27895609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Detection of faking on the MMPI-2: differentiation among faking-bad, denial, and claiming extreme virtue.
    Lim J; Butcher JN
    J Pers Assess; 1996 Aug; 67(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 16367656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Substance versus style: a new look at social desirability in motivating contexts.
    Smith DB; Ellingson JE
    J Appl Psychol; 2002 Apr; 87(2):211-9. PubMed ID: 12002950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. On the controllability of evaluative-priming effects: some limits that are none.
    Teige-Mocigemba S; Klauer KC
    Cogn Emot; 2013; 27(4):632-57. PubMed ID: 23075050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Objective detection of faking on role-play tests of assertion: gender differences.
    Kern JM
    Psychol Rep; 1996 Apr; 78(2):355-61. PubMed ID: 9148285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Controlling social desirability may attenuate faking effects: a study with aggression measures.
    Anguiano-Carrasco C; Vigil-Colet A; Ferrando PJ
    Psicothema; 2013; 25(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 23628529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Detection of conscious deception using the Child Abuse Potential Inventory lie scale.
    Robertson WK; Milner JS
    J Pers Assess; 1985 Oct; 49(5):541-4. PubMed ID: 4067804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Detection of faking on the Personality Inventory for Children.
    McVaugh WH; Grow RT
    J Clin Psychol; 1983 Jul; 39(4):567-73. PubMed ID: 6874997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Nothing but the truth? Effects of faking on the validity of the crosswise model.
    Hoffmann A; Meisters J; Musch J
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258603. PubMed ID: 34714838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.