BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11055526)

  • 1. Interpreting clinical evidence of malingering: a Bayesian perspective.
    Mossman D
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2000; 28(3):293-302. PubMed ID: 11055526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The meaning of malingering data: further applications of Bayes' theorem.
    Mossman D
    Behav Sci Law; 2000; 18(6):761-79. PubMed ID: 11180421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical symptom presentation in suspected malingerers: an empirical investigation.
    Kucharski LT; Ryan W; Vogt J; Goodloe E
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1998; 26(4):579-85. PubMed ID: 9894214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Competency to waive Miranda rights: clinical and legal issues.
    Frumkin IB
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 2000; 24(2):326-31. PubMed ID: 10870355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Should forensic patients be informed of evaluators' opinions prior to trial?
    Miller RD; Germain EJ
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1989; 17(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 2706335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical and conceptual problems in the attribution of malingering in forensic evaluations.
    Drob SL; Meehan KB; Waxman SE
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 19297641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An evaluation of malingering screens with competency to stand trial patients: a known-groups comparison.
    Vitacco MJ; Rogers R; Gabel J; Munizza J
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Jun; 31(3):249-60. PubMed ID: 17058121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Disabled doctors: the insurance industry seeks a second opinion.
    Wall BW; Appelbaum KL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1998; 26(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 9554705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Malingering in children: fibs and faking.
    Walker JS
    Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am; 2011 Jul; 20(3):547-56. PubMed ID: 21683919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Problem of a test method assessment of simulation and dissimulation in forensic expert testimony].
    Szegedi M
    Acta Med Leg Soc (Liege); 1986; 36(2):298-300. PubMed ID: 2979386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance of forensic and non-forensic adult psychiatric inpatients on the Test of Memory Malingering.
    Gierok SD; Dickson AL; Cole JA
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2005 Aug; 20(6):755-60. PubMed ID: 15894456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rule-Out and Rule-In scales for the M test for malingering: a cross-validation.
    Smith GP; Borum R; Schinka JA
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 8477101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Malingering of PTSD: forensic and diagnostic considerations, characteristics of malingerers and clinical presentations.
    Hall RC; Hall RC
    Gen Hosp Psychiatry; 2006; 28(6):525-35. PubMed ID: 17088169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neuropsychological assessment of competency to stand trial evaluations: a practical conceptual model.
    Kirkish P; Sreenivasan S
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(1):101-13. PubMed ID: 10212030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of a new classificatory model of malingering.
    Rogers R
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1990; 18(3):323-33. PubMed ID: 2245247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimizing the influence of unconscious bias in evaluations: a practical guide.
    Goldyne AJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 17389346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Evaluating the simulation of memory problems within the legal and forensic fields].
    García Domingo G; Negredo López L; Fernández Guinea S
    Rev Neurol; 2004 Apr 16-30; 38(8):766-74. PubMed ID: 15122547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An investigation of the ECST-R in male pretrial patients: evaluating the effects of feigning on competency evaluations.
    Vitacco MJ; Rogers R; Gabel J
    Assessment; 2009 Sep; 16(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 19779096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection strategies for malingering with the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test: a confirmatory factor analysis of its underlying dimensions.
    Vitacco MJ; Jackson RL; Rogers R; Neumann CS; Miller HA; Gabel J
    Assessment; 2008 Mar; 15(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 18258736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of malingering with repeat forensic evaluations: patient variability and possible misclassification on the SIRS and other feigning measures.
    Rogers R; Vitacco MJ; Kurus SJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2010; 38(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 20305084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.